In Vancouver, Canada, a small controversy has recently awakened Canadians’ concern about the infiltration of the Chinese Communist Party. In a media interview, a retired judge named Yu Hongrong said it was a “lie” to accuse the Chinese Communist Party of “genocide” in Xinjiang. Earlier, when the Canadian House of Commons passed a unanimous resolution condemning the Chinese Communist Party’s “genocide” of the Muslim minority in Xinjiang, Yu went so far as to say that “many politicians here basically don’t even know where Xinjiang is, and the so-called genocide is just a fabrication and a lie. The so-called genocide is just a fabrication and a lie.
He also said, “These so-called evidence, only from the mouth of some people, how do you prove that what these people say is the truth?”
Yu is a member of the Chinese Community Advisory Council of British Columbia, a position appointed by the Premier of British Columbia. Yu’s comments provoked discontent among many local Chinese, some of whom signed an open letter protesting to the Premier, demanding that Yu be removed from his appointment as a community advisory board member. The provincial government then took a stand, stating that the provincial government’s position on Xinjiang was consistent with that of the Canadian Parliament, and that Yu’s views were personal, before saying that he had left the council and would not seek re-election.
As a retired judge, Yu should have a basic understanding of the law. If a person from Xinjiang dares to testify in an international forum and accuse his own government of “genocide,” he will be legally responsible and take risks. “Genocide is an extremely serious crime, and without sufficient evidence, no media or government agency will believe a single person’s claims. Would they accuse the government of another country on the basis of something that they have heard and heard?
A unanimous vote in the House of Commons is no joke. There must be ample human and physical evidence to make all members vote in favor of the bill based on the UN definition of genocide. Yu’s claim that parliamentarians do not know where Xinjiang is is an underestimation of Canadian parliamentarians. In fact, the Canadian Parliament has done two studies on Xinjiang in 2018 and 2020. The Xinjiang issue has been going on for so long that any civilian with a sense of justice has to find out the truth, and as MPs are even more responsible for their votes, it is a blatant insult to all elected MPs to say that they don’t even know where Xinjiang is, implying that they are irresponsible in casting their sacred votes.
When Yu Hong Rong says he cannot prove that what Xinjiang people say is the truth, can Yu himself prove that what he says is the truth? Has he ever gone to Xinjiang to conduct an undisturbed field investigation into the allegations of genocide? Anyone who dares to come forward to accuse the government must take an oath, be cross-examined, and provide evidence of the time, place, and parties involved, and that evidence must stand up to verification, and any falsification would be extremely damaging to his personal integrity and social credibility. Yu Hongrong has been a judge, should understand the value of witness statements and the legal responsibility he needs to bear, where has his professional knowledge been lost?
If there is no genocide in Xinjiang, just ask the Chinese Communist Party why it refuses to allow foreign media to go to Xinjiang for independent field interviews. In addition, if it is only a vocational training base, why is it not voluntary to participate, but a high walled barbed wire fence is built, allowing only entry but not exit, locking a million people in a place without freedom?
Yu Hongrong had earlier excused the Chinese Communist Party’s bloodbath at Tiananmen Square. The Chinese Communist Party suppressed the Tiananmen student movement by bringing out all the tanks, the gunfire on Chang’an Street, and the hospitals full of casualties, all these shots were seen by the whole world, but not by Yu Hongrong?
Over the years, Chinese diplomats have taken advantage of the free political environment in Western countries to draw in activists from the Chinese community, “befriend” them, invite them to visit their home countries, and offer them various benefits, thus achieving the results of the unification war, so much so that many overseas Chinese have become agents of the Chinese Communist Party. They use their positions and social influence to whitewash the CCP, cover up the evils of dictatorship, and lead public opinion in the Chinese community.
The Chinese Communist Party has been engaged in a united war for many years, and the “patriotic leaders” of the Chinese communities around the world, together with the mainland pinkos, have been making waves in the Chinese communities for a long time, trying to influence the Canadian government with the so-called public opinion of the Chinese communities. It is said that 200 signatures have been collected in support of Yu Hong Rong, and it seems that the struggle between good and evil will continue.
According to the Canadian government, the assets transferred from Hong Kong people to Canada last year amounted to over HK$200 billion, and it is widely predicted that there will be another wave of Hong Kong people emigrating before September this year. The large number of Hong Kong people who have experienced the anti-China movement is bound to enrich the local forces of justice, and with the Canadian government standing firmly on the side of universal values, Yu’s performance will only become more unpopular.
Recent Comments