The brightest witness at the hearing in Georgia on Wednesday, December 30, 2020, was this Jovan Hutton Pulitzer. Mr. Jovan Hutton Pulitzer. Pulitzer is an inventor and the inventor of barcode scanning technology.
Mr. Pulitzer’s testimony included two aspects
One was about the authenticity of the paper ballots and the other was about the fact that the counting machines had direct networking. This part of the translation includes only the identification of the authenticity of the paper ballots. There are several reasons why his testimony shines particularly bright.
First, he has unquestionable professional authority in identification technology. The barcode scanning technology he invented is now used in the stores of various businesses and by users of 13 billion cell phones of all brands except huawei, and he has more than 200 technical patents, and has been engaged in the identification of paper and computer interfaces for the last 20 years or so, so when he focused his certification on paper ballots or scanned images of paper ballots, his words showed the authority of the technology and evidence that basically dumbfounded the skeptics present.
Secondly, he very clearly focused what he was trying to do on the three things of voters, ballots, and ballot protection, because the will of the voter is expressed entirely through the ballot and when a ballot is misused, it is a direct violation of the voter’s rights. He for example if we buy something from Amazon and the amount they ask us for does not match the amount they should have charged for the goods they delivered, we will not stop there, we will call every day until they return the improper deduction. Why do we lack such persistence when it is we who cast the ballot? Why do we demand less of the technology that affects our most sacred duty, the correct counting of one person per ballot, than we do of the barcode machine that calculates the price of a loaf of bread we buy at the supermarket.
He used the example of the cab driver he came to Georgia to ride with to illustrate how important the ballot is. The cab driver was an immigrant from Nigeria, a lecturer who taught economics and came to America to be able to build his business here in the land of the free to pursue his dream of opening a tire company. Many immigrants similar to him who came to the United States, the countries they left have one thing in common, and that is that the most important right they don’t have like Americans, is the right to vote as a citizen, and in some countries they cast a ballot that doesn’t change anything if there is a vote. When we talk about the ballot, it has a very important and substantial meaning. And we check whether the imprint left on top of this piece of paper, which expresses the electoral will of a real voter, has such an important meaning for the democracy of our country.
Third, the 3rd bull* of Mr. Pulitzer is that he is very clear in his thinking. He is very clear about what he has the technology to be able to identify without spending time needlessly on irrelevant questions that others are asking.
He emphasized several times that his testimony here did not have to discuss what kind of internal source code the ballot checker used, and did not care at all about what computing program it used. He only cares about whether the ballot, which represents the expressed will of the voter, can be properly scanned into the ticket program.
For how to identify whether a ballot is really mailed from the post office to the elector’s hand, and then actually filled out by the elector, and then sent back to the election department to be counted, after the ballot is scanned against the mailing machine, the results of which are certified, if it is out of the foul, should be able to be found out from the ballot and the image of the ballot itself in each step.
The first thing you can tell is whether the ballot has actually passed the above-mentioned process, just by the folds of the ballot. The technique used here, kinematic, verifies the traces left by the paper after it has been subjected to an external force, and is not a new technique that has been used to test counterfeit banknotes, art forgeries, etc. It is accepted as a reliable technique, but has not been used to test ballot papers in the past. Basically, what he said is to use this technique to check and verify the marks of the ballot paper pressed by the machine and the various characteristics of the options filled in, and to compare these characteristics in different ballots, he can answer the following 4 questions.
- Where is the ballot printed? Each printing machine leaves marks on the ballot paper that are not visible to the naked eye when it is printed. The technology he uses can identify these marks to know whether the ballots were printed in the United States or in another country. We used to hear in groups that the watermarks on the ballots were set up by the president, but now it seems that this was not involved, but that it is a common but unknown printing secret.
- whether the ballot is folded by the machine when it leaves the printer’s factory, then mailed to the voter and opened by the voter, one or more times, then filled out and then refolded back into the envelope and sent back.
- Whether the ballot paper is filled out in a very standard or uneven style, it is possible to identify whether the filling out is done by machines or by human hands.
- whether the ballot paper was put on the scanning machine one by one only once, or was the whole stack put on the scanning machine repeatedly.
He presented some specific examples.
In the Fulton County ballot, the ballot sent to a district with more Democratic voters was not exactly the same as the ballot sent to a district with more Republican voters, which had an additional barcode mark in the upper right corner. This barcode is used to track the process through which a ballot has been identified, and without it, ballots that have been identified cannot be tracked.
The second problem is that the ballots in Fulton County have different identification codes for two different areas of the ballot. This is the same county with different percentages of Republican and Democrat voters, and the ballots are clearly identifiable as to which district they came from, which should not be the case.
The most important problem is that those areas with more Republican voters have obvious deviations in the printing of the locator marks on the ballots, so much so that the ballots here are so numerous that they cannot be directly identified by the machine, but must be manually identified. He used these ballots as the location identification article code, which is visible when enlarged. All the machines used to print these documents should be able to go through the process of adjustment and print out the accurate positioning, but the ballots here have such a large deviation. So much so that Fulton County election officials reported on television that their county’s ballot identification rate was 93.67%. That means that 94 percent of the ballots in this county require a human being to determine who the voter is voting for. So what’s the point of having machines? By comparison, the 2016 general election, with over 33 million mail-in ballots, had a 1.2% waste rate. the 2018 mid-year election had about 30 million mail-in ballots and a 2.1% waste rate.
Fourth: Unlike many other witnesses, he was not only a very good speaker, but he offered solutions that were hard to resist.
He forcefully questioned the state’s executive officials, the voters of your state, the taxpayers who pay your salaries to do the work, who pay to print these ballots, and when they question whether these ballots represent their will, you tell them, you don’t have the right to see these ballots. That’s unacceptable, and that’s completely against the American spirit. It’s unacceptable and it’s completely against the American spirit for you to ask us to accept these ballots and ballot counting methods that we can’t trust at all to decide who we want to vote for. We need to know if these ballots are real or forged, and we need to know if every legitimate ballot is counted correctly and every illegitimate ballot cannot be counted. This isn’t about whether President Trump or Biden gets elected. It’s about whether our votes still count in our country.
If our votes still count, there’s a very simple and quick solution to this mess that we’re in. You say it takes days, weeks to focus or manually audit, but you give me hundreds of thousands of votes and I can check them in two hours with my machine in a completely objective way. What other reason do you have to reject my offer?
The people of your state trust you with the counting of their ballots, this ballot is the ballot they entrust to you with their right to vote, how can you possibly say that after the ballot has been scanned, the original has been eliminated, or that you can’t check the original to see if a program with such a high error rate is consistent with the original. If you were an engineer employed in any private business, you would have been removed immediately for treating your job this way, if you were an accountant in a company, you would have been removed immediately for treating your books this way, but we can’t allow something that happens in a small company to be tolerated in our national elections? It’s unacceptable, it’s against the American spirit.
“This is not drumming, this is burning down a city!”
Pulitzer was in front of the Georgia Senate today and his testimony completely destroyed the results of Georgia’s 2020 election and presented a plan where he would determine the exact results by examining the paper ballots used in the election for free.
Prior to today, We the People asked President Donald Trump to write an executive order authorizing Pulitzer to audit and review ballots and images in select states to determine if there was fraud.
Pulitzer noted that there were inherent errors in ballots in Republican districts, but not in Democratic districts.
Today in Georgia, Mr. Pulitzer gave a speech that all of America should see and hear.
Pulitzer shared.
“I’m not concerned about deceptive misinformation about how the machine works, what’s hidden in the code, or how this machine is perceived to be programmed. If the machine worked as programmed, none of us would be standing here. We’re here because something is broken.”
So I said, “I don’t care about the machine, I don’t even care about the code that’s written in the machine. I care about the physical piece. You know what? That physical object has substantial differences from district to district that it shouldn’t have …… Why would it?
He shared the trust the people of Georgia have in their state government to ensure that elections are valid and fraud-free.
The current election results are flawed :
“This is not drumming, this is burning down a city!”
Our state is built on a piece of paper! Pulitzer could tell almost immediately if a vote was fraudulent by looking at that piece of paper. Pulitzer noted that he could look at half a million ballots in a few hours.
On-the-spot proof of illegal voting machine networking.
Pulitzer told Georgia lawmakers that he had just hacked into the Dominion voting system at a Georgia polling place.
Pulitzer confirmed that Georgia’s runoff election was connected to the Internet.
He established two-way communication at a polling center.
Says Pulitzer, “At this moment, at a polling place in the county, we not only have access to the voting booth-system through our equipment, but we have access.”
He continued, “And it shouldn’t have WiFi, it shouldn’t be able to happen, so we’ve now documented it in two ways of real-time communication, meaning it’s receiving data and sending data – it shouldn’t be happening, it shouldn’t be WiFi, we’ve now documented it in real-time communication.”
“This is going on there, where everybody is voting (in the Georgia runoff).”
Pulitzer explains what damage a bad actor visiting a Dominion voting machine can do.
The Georgia Senate Judiciary Committee unanimously passed a motion to audit absentee ballots in Fulton County using the method proposed by Pulitzer.
Members of the Georgia Senate Judiciary Committee and members of the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing Wednesday to examine Georgia’s election laws and their past and current impact on the current election cycle.
Pulitzer explained how he uses his technique for identifying fake paper ballots to quickly audit their results, and said he will do it for free.
Recent Comments