On December 17, White House Trade Counsel Peter Navarro issued a report exposing the election fraud, accusing Biden of being “elected” without legitimacy, and denouncing the multiple agencies that covered up the fraud and suppressed the truth, sending a warning to all.
This is the most comprehensive and detailed investigation of election fraud to date, identifying allegations of election fraud in six key states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin), and is of great interest.
Three implications of the report
First, the report refutes the leftist media and the Biden camp’s claims that the election was fair and that President Trump‘s allegations of election fraud were “unfounded.
The report analyzes and compares six areas of blatant voting fraud, ballot mishandling, questionable process irregularities, equal protection violations, voting machine irregularities, and significant statistical anomalies, citing evidence from more than 50 lawsuits and judicial decisions, thousands of affidavits and statements, testimony from state legislatures, reports and analyses released by think tanks and law centers, relevant videos and photos, public opinion and first-hand accounts, extensive news coverage, and more.
Second, the report rejects the legitimacy of Biden’s “election” and shows that President Trump is the winner. The report’s second conclusion reads, “The number of questionable votes found to be related to election irregularities was sufficient to flip the existing election results in favor of President Trump, even if only a relatively small percentage of those votes were found to be illegal.”
This is why President Trump declared, “If every legal vote is counted, I will win easily.” For the same reason, attorneys Giuliani, Powell and Linwood are confident of a flipped result, but only if: ballot fraud is investigated and all illegal votes are eliminated.
Third, the report is critical of the media, social media, legislature and judiciary that ignore and promote election fraud, and notes that U.S. elections and social stability will be severely damaged as a result.
The report reads, “The anti-Trump media and social media outlets that censor speech have refused to investigate the growing number of legitimate complaints and have been complicit in blocking the American public from knowing the truth,” while “undermining the credibility of the media and destabilizing the political system and the Republic.
The report also noted that some Republican politicians in six key states “have failed to meet their constitutional obligations and responsibilities under intense political pressure, and have failed their states, the country, and their political parties.” “In addition, state and federal courts, including the Supreme Court, have also failed the American people …….”
The above conclusions are all supported by facts, and the world has seen that for more than a month, most of the media, social media giants, the court system and some dignitaries and officials in the United States have sided with the election fraudsters, who have used different ways to suppress the legitimate complaints of President Trump and voters from all walks of life, and the absurdity and arrogance of their abuses is mind-boggling. What are the driving forces behind these disruptions?
The Report’s Unusual Features
As an economist, Navarro’s involvement in electoral affairs is unusual. The report should have been written by an election official, an intelligence agency, the Justice Department, or a congressional committee, but none of them did anything.
In the report, Navarro explicitly states, “If these election irregularities are not fully investigated before presidential inauguration day, but are recognized as valid, there is a real risk that the country will never again be able to hold a fair presidential election”; “If this is not done before (presidential) inauguration day do so, we risk putting in office an illegitimate president who lacks the support of the majority of the American people.”
The day after the Navarro report was released, on the afternoon of Dec. 18, Reuters reported that Yohannes Abraham, executive director of the Biden transition team, revealed in a phone call that the Defense Department had abruptly suspended the handover.
Earlier in the day, Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller said in a statement that some (handover) meetings were rescheduled, though they were not canceled or denied. He also said the Defense Department and the transition team agreed to suspend talks for two weeks during the December holiday period. However, Abraham said no such agreement exists, and he hopes the Defense Department will retract that decision.
Is there a connection between the DOD suspending the handover just after Navarro released his report? Is this report setting up and signaling the big move that will happen?
Who is Navarro? He is a well-known “non-mainstream” economist who advocates protecting U.S. interests and has a clear understanding of the economic, military, and ideological threats posed by the Chinese Communist Party to the United States and the world. He believes that one should stay tough on the Chinese Communist Party on tariffs, and many of his ideas have been adopted and appreciated by President Trump.
On January 29, 2020, Navarro issued a memo warning that the New Coronavirus (a Chinese Communist virus) could “evolve into a full-blown pandemic, endangering the lives of millions of Americans” and advocating for restrictions on travel from China. Shortly after, Trump adopted the recommendation. Navarro later criticized Chinese authorities for concealing the outbreak and allowing the virus to spread, leading to a global pandemic.
Navarro had earlier registered as a Democrat, Independent and unaffiliated before re-registering as a Republican in February 2018. He has made three unsuccessful attempts to enter San Diego City Hall.
Navarro, despite being politically literate, has published a well-reasoned, hard-hitting report exposing fraud in the U.S. election. His performance was very different from the Democratic left, Republican bigwigs like McConnell and Romney. Many politicians and judges usually shout “democracy”, “human rights” and “rule of law”, but they are all “politically correct”. Once their own interests are touched, they reveal their true colors and go so far as to blatantly break the law, allow illegal practices, and pervert black and white.
On the level of facts and conscience, Navarro’s report is commendable, and its significance will be further revealed.
Recent Comments