The “Zuckerberg” election funding clause: Disobedient money withdrawal

According to Nation on December 16, the Amistad Project, an election integrity monitoring group, highlighted in its recent press conference how Mark Zuckerberg has limited his $500 million campaign funds, including the ability to withdraw donations if counties do not meet all of his demands.

The disclosure adds to growing doubts about Mr Zuckerberg’s meddling in the 2020 election, including the fact that he is using almost all of his funds to boost Democratic turnout specifically.

Amistad project director Phill Klein in a press conference on December 16, the organization, this paper expounds the nearly $400 million from zuckerberg “technology center and the citizen life” (CTCL) is how to with the state officials and legislators that stipulated in the contract, if you do not comply with their requirements, they can ask to reclaim them with millions of dollars.

Among every contract CTCL signs with Mark Zuckerberg’s money is a withdrawal agreement that says, ‘If you don’t follow our plan, we will withdraw our money.’ All funds.

In short, “you have to do what we say,” Klein said.

A fellow lawyer in the Amistad project pointed out that they had found “clawback clauses in CTCL contracts with local governments, local election officials” and “specific language in the contracts saying that election officials must use the money for certain things”.

“Ballot boxes, satellite polls, a whole bunch of stuff, it’s all in the kickback agreements. So what we are seeing here is a private agency giving money to local elected officials and signing contracts that require these local constituencies and election officials to do specific things, “he said. “He added.

“The reimbursement clause in the CTCL agreement states that the county or city receiving the CTCL grant has a long-term legal liability. These legal liabilities create long-term audit, bond or pension risks for counties receiving CTCL grants, “the official report on the Amistad project noted.