One Media’s share price had bounced 17%, and the investor group urged to check the stock price fluctuation.

One Media (00282) Lai Chi-ying, who is being remanded to Lai Chi Kok Reception Centre for fraud, was involved in an interview calling for foreign sanctions against Hong Kong, and is now charged with colluding with a foreign country or foreign forces to endanger national security. One Media shares moved again this (11) afternoon, the market once soared 17% to a high of $0.3; the day closed at $0.28, up 9.8%, with a turnover of $16.1 million.

One Media share price fluctuations in August has been more than 4 months, but the SFC investigation has not yet results, nor has the progress of the account. Various sectors have requested the SFC to speed up the progress of the investigation and urged other financial departments to take the initiative to intervene in the investigation in order to protect investors’ rights.

The convener of the Investor Rights Concern Group, Mr. Chan Chung-cheung, denounced the SFC’s inaction, turning retail and small investors into lambs to be slaughtered by the troublemakers. He said he had noticed the share price movement of Next Media last Friday, but was more concerned about the fact that the SFC has not made any update on the investigation of the matter since August, four months after the share price fluctuation of Next Media, giving people the impression that the SFC is doing something passive and inactive, which easily allows the bad guys in the stock market to take advantage of it.

He explained that, looking at the business alone, Next Media’s prospects are not good and not worth investing in, but it is suspected that some people are taking advantage of people’s political attitudes, claiming that buying the company’s shares is to support the company and support a certain political orientation. However, the company’s share price has fallen from a high of $1.96 in August to the current level of about $0.2, and those who have not taken the stock have suffered serious losses. However, the SFC has never explained whether anyone has broken the law and has been too slow to act.