Netflix: 3 billion aid withdrawal! Chinese Communist Party withdraws from WHO!

Net rumor film “3 billion aid withdrawal! China withdraws from WHO! The United States united with 26 countries to force the first day of re-election of Tan Desai! China countermeasures! The last WHO statement exposed! 76 countries support! The West is dumbfounded!” ?

After checking.

One, the online video is not a news video, and its source is not a credible media.

Checking the WHO website, the list of candidates for the next WHO Director-General will be announced in early November 2021, and the inauguration date will be August 2022, so the rumor that “Tan Desai’s first day of re-election” is not true. In addition, rumors that China withdrew from WHO and withdrew $3 billion in aid are also not true.

Third, the first phase of the WHO traceability report is to confirm that there is indeed virus contamination in Wuhan and Wuhan South China market, study four possible ways, the conclusion is that more scientific evidence is needed to do further research and investigation. The rumor that “China was actively cooperating with the first phase of traceability investigation, and that the findings of the investigation did not originate from China, which was supported by Tan Desai at the time” is a false and fabricated information.

Therefore, the rumors are “false”.

Background

On October 4, the video platform channel “Military Politics Express” released the video “3 billion aid withdrawn! China withdraws from WHO! The U.S. united with 26 countries to push Tan Desai for re-election on the first day! China countermeasures! The last WHO statement exposed! 76 countries support! The West is dumbfounded!” On October 6, another audio-visual channel “Breaking Pioneer” also released a video with a similar title and the same content, “The United States pushed Tan Desai to be re-elected on the same day! China withdraws from WHO! Withdrawal of aid 3 billion! China’s last speech on behalf of the WHO was revealed! Then a scene happened! The world can’t believe it!” Then the rumor video was circulated on social media platforms.

The rumor video alleges that.

“…… China was actively cooperating with the first phase of the traceability investigation, which found that the new crown did not come from China, a claim supported by Tan Desai at the time, but ignored the WHO’s internal recommendations for the U.S. and Brazilian investigations and insisted on setting up a new team to conduct a second investigation into China.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said that some people in the U.S. side are using the epidemic to slander China at every turn, and that WHO officials are flattering the U.S. and smearing China for no good reason, and that China is determined to say no to this and will launch sanctions.

WHO came to China to investigate the conclusion that it is highly unlikely that the new crown virus (CCP virus) came from a laboratory leak, and the theory of laboratory leak of the new crown concocted by the U.S. and other countries is not broken …… Tan Desai hugged the leg of the United States, even if there are other rivals exist, it will not pose any threat to him. All current evidence on the origin of the virus points to DePaul, but WHO has chosen not to ask about it ……”

Checking

What is the source of the rumored video?

The source of the rumored video is the YouTube video channel “Military Government Express”, which was released on October 4, 2021 and has been viewed 46,948 times. The other video is from the YouTube channel “Breaking Bad”, which was released on October 6, 2021 and has been viewed 18,865 times.

These two channels are not official channels set up by the media, and the other videos produced by these two channels do not have interviews with journalists or sources, but rather a machine voice reading narration with photo images. Upon further review of the two channels, the Center found that the majority of the channel’s videos were on international topics, especially those related to the United States.

In addition to the online video, “Military Politics Express” also released another video on October 9 with the title “Expel Australian Ambassador! Claim 60 billion! Europe announced sanctions against Australia on the second day! China has taken action to impose additional sanctions! Morrison angrily asked Beijing what the hell! Morrison angrily asked Beijing what the hell! The film. Another channel “11 U.S. troops killed! U.S. forces fall into the South China Sea! The USS Connecticut nuclear submarine was sunk in the South China Sea! The reason for the exposure of the United States incredible! Biden is furious: China’s move is too tough!”

When we look at these two channels separately, the topics of the videos released by these two channels are mostly fictional international news, and the content of the videos do not match the titles. Therefore, it is clear that the online video is not a news video, and its source is not a credible media channel.

Controversial point two: the rumor “3 billion aid withdrawn! China withdraws from WHO! U.S. unites with 26 countries to force Tandezai’s first day of re-election! China countermeasures ……” The day the U.S. pushed Tan Desai for a second term! China withdraws from WHO! Withdraw aid 3 billion”, “…… Is it true that Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said he would withdraw $3 billion in aid to the WHO and withdraw at a later date?

Checking the WHO website, the information shows that the term of office of the next WHO Director-General will start in August 2022, and the nomination of candidates for the election of the Director-General will close on September 23, 2021, and the WHO Secretariat will announce the list of candidates in early November; the rumor that “the first day of the re-election of Tan Desai” is not true.

The rumors that “Tan Desai was re-elected on the first day” are not true.

Searching the official website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Communist Party of China and the website of the Chinese official media Xinhua News Agency, there is no information that the spokesman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Communist Party of China, Zhao Lijian, mentioned that he would withdraw 3 billion yuan of aid to the WHO and withdraw at a later date.

Controversial point three, rumors that “China was actively cooperating with the first phase of the traceability investigation, the findings of the new crown did not come from China, at that time Tan Desai support this claim”, the first phase of the WHO traceability report, the content and context of what?

(a) According to the WHO-convened global study of origins of SARS-CoV-2: China Part, which was published on the WHO website on March 30, 2021, the origin of the new coronavirus was traced to which animal the virus originated from, the possible intermediate hosts, and how it was transmitted to humans. The report traces the origin of the new coronavirus, which animal it originated from, possible intermediate hosts, and how it was transmitted to humans.

This report traced four possibilities, including direct zoonotic transmission, through intermediate hosts, through the food supply chain, and through laboratory leakage, with the first three assessed as probable and laboratory leakage as highly unlikely.

(b) Speaking on March 30, Desai Tan pointed out that after his discussion with the expert team, the team responded that there were difficulties in obtaining raw data, and he called for more immediate and comprehensive data for future collaborative studies; and the team has confirmed the existence of widespread contamination of the Wuhan South China market with the new coronavirus, but is still unsure of the source of contamination. He suggested that this report is only the beginning and that further studies should be done to track animals sold in Wuhan and South China markets to understand potential animal hosts and to confirm the role of the South China market.

As for the report’s conclusion that the pathway “through the laboratory and into the population” is highly unlikely, Tandse said, “I think this assessment is not broad enough and further data and studies are needed to draw stronger conclusions.

At the July 15 COVID-19 regular press conference, Tan said China did not share enough data with the WHO team during the first investigation regarding the “laboratory hypothesis”; he called on China to provide clear information about the Wuhan laboratory and said he, as a medical expert, “knows that laboratory accidents are possible. “knows that laboratory accidents are possible.”

(iii) In response to letters from China and some member states to WHO protesting that the investigation into the “lab claim” was political pressure, WHO’s August 12 statement (WHO Statement on advancing the next series of studies to find the origins of The WHO Statement on advancing the next series of studies to find the origins of SARS-CoV-2〉 said that in reviewing the Phase I investigation report, WHO confirmed that there is not enough scientific evidence to rule out any hypothesis, especially in order to address the “laboratory” hypothesis, the most critical thing is that WHO was able to obtain all the data to conceptualize the best scientific research methods and examine the mechanism.

Taken together, the findings of the WHO Phase I investigation report confirm that the Wuhan and Wuhan South China markets are indeed contaminated with the virus, and that there are multiple possibilities and the need for further research and investigation, without stating that “New Crown did not come from China”. The rumor that “China was actively cooperating with the first phase of the traceability investigation, and the results of the investigation showed that New Crown did not come from China, which was supported by Tan Deasy at the time” is a false and fabricated information.

Controversy four, rumors that “all current evidence on the origin of the virus points to DePaul, but the WHO chose not to ask questions about this is for”, “the United States of America to the new crown virus research and development links around the world, which led to a global virus storm, and many media filmed DePaul all kinds of Is it true?

(a) The Check Center reviewed reports from the New York Times, Washington Post, Associated Press, Reuters, AFP, and other U.S. media and international news agencies from March 2020 to October 2021, and there was no theme of the origin of the virus pointing to Fort Detroit.

The media outlets that questioned DePaul were Chinese official media, including Xinhua News Agency, People’s Daily, and Global Times.

(b) The Center also reviewed the rumors, which did not cite any sources and did not provide any evidence.

Conclusion

(1) The online video is not a news video, and its source is not a credible media.

According to the WHO website, the list of candidates for the next WHO Director-General will be announced in early November 2021, and the inauguration date will be August 2022, so the rumor on the Internet that “Tan Desai will be re-elected on the first day” is not true. In addition, rumors that China withdrew from WHO and withdrew $3 billion in aid are also not true.

Third, the first phase of the WHO traceability report is to confirm that there is indeed virus contamination in Wuhan and Wuhan South China market, study four possible ways, the conclusion is that more scientific evidence is needed to do further research and investigation. The rumor that “China was actively cooperating with the first phase of traceability investigation, and that the findings of the investigation did not originate from China, which was supported by Tan Desai at the time” is a false and fabricated information.

Therefore, the rumors are “false”.