French experts: Chinese Communist Party reports had leaked suspected “patient zero” information

French digital expert Gilles Demaneuf recently said he found information on the Internet about the suspected Chinese Communist virus (New Coronavirus) “Patient Zero” previously reported by the Chinese Communist Party. The patient contracted the disease on Sept. 29, 2019, and has since died.

According to the Sunday Post on Sunday, May 30, Dermanuve said that Yu Chuanhua, a professor of biostatistics and vice dean of the Wuhan University School of Public Health, who edits the official website for patients with the CCP virus, told the Health Times in an interview in early 2020 that the website he edited had registered 47,000 suspected and confirmed patients by the end of February 2020.

At the time, Yu said, “These data include a suspected patient who contracted the disease on Sept. 29, 2019,” the Health Times report reads. The data show that this patient was not tested for nucleic acid and was clinically diagnosed as a probable case. This patient later died.”

Yu Chuanhua then introduced a 61-year-old female patient surnamed Su who was infected on Nov. 14, 2019, a 62-year-old male patient surnamed Wang who was infected on Nov. 21, 2019, and several patients who were infected in the Dec. 8 outbreak. The Chinese Communist Party only informed the WHO on December 8 that it had found “information on the earliest cases of the disease”.

Although the snapshots obscure the personal information of the two patients, it is still possible to identify the home address of the patient and the hospital where he was seen, according to Dermanuve, who posted a snapshot of the case of patient Su and patient Wang in an article later published online by the Health Times.

He learned from the case that patient Su lived in the Kaila Guiyuan neighborhood on Zhuodaoquan Street in Wuhan’s Hongshan District, 600 meters from the Rongjun Hospital where she was seen, less than 1 mile from the Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, less than 3 miles from the Wuhan Institute of Virus Research, and 13 miles from the Wuhan Aquatic Products Market. Both the Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the Wuhan Institute of Virus Research are institutions that conduct research on bat-related coronaviruses. And the CCP had claimed early in the outbreak that the origin of the outbreak was the aquatic products market.

Dermanuve also described the Health Times interview with Yu Chuanhua as coming on the day that the CCP authorities announced that they were blocking news about the new coronavirus as Xi Jinping prepared to regain control of the situation. Two days later, Yu Chuanhua requested that the article be pulled, citing incorrect dates provided at the time and the need to verify any suspected patients before Dec. 8. But Dermanuve still found the article and related snapshots of the two patients online. He also found that the patients’ dates of illness were nearly a month earlier than the official date of the first patient.

According to Dermanuve, these new findings suggest that if there is a sustained and determined search for the basis of the laboratory leak theory, rather than (as with the WHO) “wishful acceptance of the CCP’s statements,” there may be more clues to refute the CCP’s official claim that the virus was naturally transmitted from animals to humans. He estimated that because of Ms. Su’s home address, she may have played a significant role in later causing the 11 million Wuhaners to contract the disease.

Tom Tugendhat, chairman of the British House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee, urged the Chinese Communist Party to tell the world about the source of the virus. He said, “It is time for the Chinese Communist Party to open up all documents and let the world know the truth about the source of the virus. Without acknowledging that we all need to share knowledge and learn from our mistakes, we cannot protect ourselves from future risks.”

WHO was widely condemned earlier this year when it allowed the CCP to review the team of experts it sent to Wuhan to investigate the source of the CCP virus, and was seen as helping the CCP to clear its name.

Modeling experts at the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom have said that if the CCP had contained the outbreak three weeks ahead of the 2019 epidemic, rather than hiding it, the number of people infected globally might have been reduced by 95 percent.