The government has set up a so-called “Chinese History Curriculum Framework” so that teachers can talk about the May Fourth Movement, but must emphasize that Chinese culture and tradition, though “challenged”, are still “enduring”. However, it must be emphasized that although Chinese culture and traditions have been “challenged”, they are still “enduring”, and students must understand that “cultural security is the foundation of national stability”.
“The first article of the May Fourth Movement was the abolition of the literary language and the promotion of the so-called “I write with my own hands”. The second one was to bring down Confucianism and abolish Confucian ethics education. The third one was to introduce the so-called democracy and science from the West, and to educate Chinese people to abandon the idea of imperial servility and to speak with some logic.
The so-called May Fourth Movement was, thus, a complete subversion of Chinese culture. If the “Chinese culture and traditions” that were targeted for eradication by the May Fourth Movement were still truly “enduring”, Chinese officials today would still be issuing If the “Work Report of the Premier of the State Council” had been issued in Chinese, the following buzzwords would not have appeared in Chinese Internet language: CNMB (X your mother’s cunt), MDZZ (fucking retard), WSJ (not the American Wall Street Journal, but tampons) and other new Chinese Roman Pinyin abbreviations.
As for women, if “Chinese cultural traditions have always been in vogue”, please ask the Special Education Bureau to explain: why women in Hong Kong do not still tie their feet today, why they do not implement the traditional Chinese cultural system of wives and concubines under the Qing law, and why they have to forget their ancestors by copying the monogamous system of Western white Christian civilization, and why they use a Why is a woman the Chief Executive today?
As for the third point, the so-called democracy and science, the SAR government’s “framework” is half right: democracy by universal suffrage in the West has proven to be incompatible with the Chinese people, who need an emperor.
But the “science” aspect is more controversial. I don’t understand why two major Chinese scientists who stayed in the United States: Qian Xuesen believed that an acre of land could produce 10,000 pounds of grain, while Yang Zhenning told the world’s Chinese, including the students of the University of Hong Kong in the 1970s, that after the Cultural Revolution, Chairman Mao and Jiang Qing had led the Chinese people to find the right path – a statement that was made by Deng Xiaoping and Jiang Zemin during their three decades in power. During the thirty years when Jiang Zemin was in power, Professor Yang was silent for a while. Today, it seems that Professor Yang, who is well versed in both physics and Chinese social sciences, should be right, so it is controversial.
So the “May Fourth Movement” lesson, even if the Secretary for Education Yang Yunxiong personally wrote the textbook, set the Model Answer, and constantly moved the Dragon Gate, the patriotic bottom line and red line every year or two will be painted out and changed again, in Hong Kong, the more you read this subject, the more you see the ghost. “May Fourth” and “June Fourth”, both belong to the highly aversive curriculum, it is best to delete.
The Secretary for Education of the Special Administrative Region is on the side of the incessant grunts, parents who have the means to send their children to the United Kingdom constantly stuffed. In this regard, a few months, I really can’t stand to see, to do the responsibility of a bystander living in Hong Kong, and constantly advise these parents: East rise and fall, the United Kingdom is not only declining, there Gover 19 variants, read the death of your son ah, the British white fart fragrant some?
Recent Comments