The leak of Xi Jinping‘s and his daughter’s personal information continues to fester. Recently, Xiao Yanrui, the founder of “Vulgar Wiki”, disclosed that Xi’s personal information was purchased for 6,000 yuan and that the public security officials and bureaucrats involved in the sale of Xi’s personal information have been secretly dealt with.
Xiao Yanrui, the founder of “Vicious Wiki” and “Chinawiki”, who lives in Japan, told Radio Free Asia on the 23rd that Xi Jinping’s daughter Xi Mingze’s personal information was leaked from the Communist Party’s public security, traffic police, border inspection and other citizen information control systems, and was paid for. The leak was made in September 2018.
Xi’s personal information was revealed on the Internet as early as September 2018, but did not attract much attention from public opinion at the Time. Later, some people followed the trail through Xi’s personal information to obtain the identities of his Family members, including Xi Mingze.
Xiao Yanrui said that Xi’s passport information was obtained by paying a high price and then the purchaser uploaded the information to the Internet. Basically, the information was sold from the public security system itself so that it could be circulated among the general public.
Xiao Yanrui said that China’s household registration system is divided into several categories, and the household registration photo and ID number Xi Jinping was sold came from the public security household registration system. The photo was uploaded to “Chinawiki” and “Red Bank Foundation”.
Xiao Yanrui disclosed that the citizen information management department has been a black industry chain of selling citizens’ personal information. It costs about 15 yuan to get a piece of citizen information from the traffic police’s “police pass”; and only 60 to 150 yuan to get a piece of personal information or family information through the Public Security Bureau’s “fuzzy list” query.
He said the public security officials who actually sold information about Xi and his family have been dealt with internally. The “witness Deng Mougui” in the first trial verdict of the case of 24 young people who were sentenced to prison on the “Vulgar Wiki” website should be Xi Jinping’s brother-in-law Deng Jiagui, but his testimony was false because Deng’s personal information never appeared on the Vulgar Wiki website.
Recently, 10 Parents of the “Vulgar Wiki case” published an open letter in the “Rights Defense Network”, saying that the 24 young people who were sentenced became “cannon fodder” and “sacrificial lambs” for the Maoming police to claim credit. The flawed evidence and reasoning in the Maoming court’s decision, and the shocking verdict, will be a shame in the history of Chinese law.
Among the 24 members of the “vulgar wiki case” who were sentenced, nine were minors and five were under 20 years old when they were arrested. Niu Tengyu, a computer genius under the age of 20, was convicted as the “main offender” and sentenced to 14 years and a fine of 130,000 yuan, while the other 23 young people also received heavy sentences of varying degrees.
In their letter, the parents wrote that most of them were political prisoners for simply participating in the editing of the “Vulgar Wiki” entries.
Xiao Yanrui said he could testify that Niu Tengyu and the others who were sentenced had nothing to do with the “Xi Mingze personal information exposure incident.
Xiao Yanrui also said on the 18th that the Guangdong Maoming public prosecution and law enforcement teamed up to produce the yin and yang documents, framing Niu Tengyu as the “main culprit”, and that Li Chunsheng, head of the Guangdong Public Security Bureau, was questioned as the person behind the incident.
After the scandal came to light, the Maoming Municipal Political and Legal Committee immediately met with Niu Tengyu’s first trial defender, Foshan, Guangdong lawyer Tian Haibo, through the local Justice Bureau on the afternoon of the 19th to warn him. Tian said that the judicial bureau asked him for an interview, saying that the Maoming Political and Legal Committee had called him there, saying that he should not have pleaded not guilty and that he was on the wrong side of the political spectrum.
In addition to Niu Tengyu’s first-instance defender being threatened, the other 23 young people’s defense lawyers have also been threatened, and some have withdrawn from the defense under pressure.
Niu Tengyu’s mother believes that all parties in Maoming have joined forces to fabricate the case and, after it was exposed in the media, attempted to use high-handed tactics to suppress lawyers and pressure parents in an attempt to block out the truth.
On February 23, a source revealed that Niu Tengyu had previously issued a statement exposing the police torture to extract confessions, and that the Guangdong Provincial Public Security Department had sent someone to the Maoming Detention Center to investigate, and that the atmosphere in Maoming was quite tense at the moment.
About four months ago, Niu Tengyu managed to bring out a statement that he was tortured by the police and forced to write hundreds of thousands of words of “self-reporting materials”, but they were all forced to make up, do not represent their own views, and most of them are not true.
Recent Comments