A new generation of media held a 2021 “New Year’s Eve Festival” to playfully mock Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist regime. Screenshot of the “New Year Festival” video
A group of new Internet generation is planning to take advantage of the Lunar New Year to broadcast a “New Year’s Eve Festival” through YouTube and other platforms to mock Xi Jinping, the general secretary of the Communist Party of China, and two staff members of the participating groups in the mainland are out of touch with the outside world. Overseas participants of the event believe that the authorities have mobilized national resources to maintain stability across provinces. In addition, one of the YouTube channels participating in the event was reported by Chinese video site bilibili (or B) for “copyright infringement” and almost blocked, and a Telegram group was stolen and “massacred” by suspected Chinese Communist Party Internet police. Some of the channel’s founders denounced B-site as having been ordered to go to war and accused YouTube of kneeling down to Beijing. Some believe that the authorities’ cheap crackdown will only provoke a backlash.
A group of Chinese netizens had planned to co-organize a live broadcast of the “New Year Festival” during the Chinese Lunar New Year (i.e., the Chinese New Year), and to spoof top Chinese Communist Party leaders on online social media platforms and channels such as “New Clam News Agency” and “Wall Country Frog Clam”. Wall Country Frog Clam Clam”, “Breast Film Xinlian”, and “Breast Turbine”. However, these groups have recently been “massacred” (using social media rules to drive away audiences) or “blown up” (if infringement is reported, resulting in account suspension, so-called “blowing up accounts”), and some Participants lost contact with the outside world.
The new generation of Internet users organized the 2021 “New Year’s Eve Festival” to playfully mock Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist regime. (Screenshot from the “New Year Festival” video)
One of the organizers of the joint “New Year’s Worship Festival”, the president and another administrator of Lactic Film Xinlian, have been out of contact with the outside world since Tuesday (9).
The lost president’s Telegram account suddenly sent a message to the Telegram group of “Wall Country Frog Clam”, another partner of the “New Year Festival”, in the afternoon of the same day. The small group “massacre”, more than 580 people were kicked out of the group. Another administrator, “W”, kicked out a large number of participants from the “Wall Country Frog Clam” Telegram group, and was discovered when he kicked out more than 300 people.
The person in charge of “Wall Country Frog Clam Clam” told the station that he suspected that the accounts of the two people who lost contact had been controlled by the Chinese Communist Party’s Internet police. They later moved the interlopers out of the group to prevent the “big group” from being destroyed again. The person in charge believes that this unusual action should be the intention of the Chinese Communist authorities to stop the live broadcast of the “New Year’s Eve Festival”.
The head of “Wall Country Frog Clam Clam” said: “The president of “Breast Film Xinlian Society” and “W”, the administrator of the big group, should be people who do not meet in reality, but the Telegram accounts of these two people have been used by unknown people to broadcast the “New Year’s Eve Festival”. But the Telegram accounts of both of them were controlled by unknown people who “stole their accounts online” or “confiscated their cell phones”, and then “massacred the group”. It is likely that the CCP mobilized national, rather than county and municipal, resources to maintain stability in order to investigate and deal with the two men in different places.
Wall Country Frog Clam” also told the station that on Wednesday evening (10), “Little Anti-Flag” and “Little Pond”, both channels of the “Milk News Agency”, received copyright alerts. “The two channels received copyright alerts, and the videos uploaded earlier by the two channels were subsequently removed by YouTube.
After the incident came to light, some netizens suspected that YouTube was also infiltrated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but the person in charge of “Wall Country Frog Clam” personally tended to disagree with the conspiracy theory that the YouTube platform was bought by the CCP, stressing that the CCP was behind it.
The screenshot of the “copyright alert” he provided to the station shows that the two channels were complained about by the entity that operates the famous Chinese video site “bilibili” (B-site). -Ltd. complained of copyright infringement. According to YouTube rules, if three copyright alerts are received, the channels will be terminated.
The person in charge of “Wall Country Frog Clam” thinks that B website is suspected of “going on a mission by order”.
Another person in charge of “Wall Country Frog Clam Clam” said, “Obviously, B station has received instructions from the Chinese Communist Party, and on the eve of the live broadcast of the “New Year’s Day Festival”, it used YouTube’s rules to try to make the channel “broadcast” by casting a wide net of reports. The “BreastTalk” channel quickly triggered YouTube’s suspension mechanism, thus blocking the live broadcast of the “New Year’s Eve Festival”. Personally, I tend to deny the conspiracy theory that the YouTube platform was bought by the CCP, and prefer to believe that the CCP used YouTube’s platform rules to achieve its evil goal of “keeping the earth under control”. Everyone on earth knows that the CCP is a rogue who does not speak of martial virtue. The Chinese Communist Party instructed the B website to catch the thief.
The founder of “Wall Country Frog Clam” also pointed out that while the CCP closes the country and blocks overseas social media, it sends the CCP’s “diplomatic corps” and mouthpieces to these platforms, and sends a wide range of “water forces On the other hand, it sends its “diplomatic corps” and mouthpieces to these platforms, and sends a wide range of “water forces” to use the reporting mechanism of social media to block access and delete accounts of those voices that criticize the CCP. He believes that democratic countries should think about how to deal with the CCP’s shameless tricks.
Some online analysts believe that the incident reflects YouTube’s capitulation to China and its flawed mechanism.
Jin Guo, an international student in the U.S., told us that the incident is a unified crackdown by the Chinese Communist Party authorities, with B-site acting as an accomplice. According to Jin, common sense tells us that there is no way that B-site, which operates on a large scale in China, could have produced original videos satirizing Xi Jinping and the CCP dictatorship, and that there is a precedent for YouTube to block Anti-Communist channels on the grounds of rules. He said that in recent years, a new generation of independent thinkers on the Internet has started to launch a “Culture of insulting bags” in social media outside the walls, using black humor such as cartoons and public videos to “hang” (beat their opponents to the punch) and deconstruct the Chinese Communist Party. Xi Jinping’s propaganda image of “Wei Guangzheng” (greatness, brightness, correctness) is spreading rapidly among the younger generation.
Jin Guo said: “The producer has not posted the same content on Bleepy, and there is no possibility that the copyright on Bleepy is involved. “The company reported that when it was told to do this, it accepted the task and “could not let the image of His Holiness be discredited” and did a “lapdog” job. It did a “lapdog” job. YouTube is no longer the truly free platform we thought it would be, and it may have been tainted by the Reds and started to compromise with them. This is not the first Time that YouTube has been deleted, as it was the case with Hong Kong‘s “Gordon Music Channel”.
Jin lamented that in the early years, there was still room for folk to spread mockery of Jiang Zemin’s “clam culture,” but under Xi Jinping, all dissenting voices were severely suppressed.
Jin said: In fact, more than 10 years ago, there was political humor to spoof Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao, but not with Xi Jinping, who created an image of authority, the only “savior” of China and the world, and did not allow Anyone who “discredits” him and suppresses the freedom of speech of everyone in the world to comment on him.
Tom Gan Long, who lives in the United States, has posted many videos and emojis on social media mocking Xi Jinping. In an interview with the station, he said that the administrators of the social media group he created had also had their accounts stolen by the Chinese Communist Party’s Internet police. He criticized the Communist authorities for using cheap tactics to suppress new generations overseas who challenge Xi Jinping, which only provokes a backlash.
Tom Ganlong said: “I am the Ganlong of the “breast bag”. I don’t know why the Chinese Communist Party is harassing our “milk bun co-prosperity circle” in such a cheap way, which is another example of the contempt of the Chinese Communist Party and Xi Jinping for freedom of expression. We have worked so hard to mock Xi Jinping and build a group to tease him every day, how can the members of the group just disappear? “Baozi”, you do not go too far. The more powerful you ban us, the more powerful our “breast pack will be breast!”
It is reported that after the complaints and infringement storm, the “breast agency” emergency response to the crisis, all the video temporarily set to private video, effectively preventing the channel was suspended by YouTube. On Thursday night (11), the live broadcast of the “New Year’s Eve Festival” was held. Both channels, “Little Anti-Flag” and “Little Pond,” showed their content again, and both channels uploaded several more satirical videos of Xi Jinping. However, videos such as “Xi Baozi also wants to challenge the king of poetry” and “Welcome to Qincheng”, which were the most widely distributed videos on “Little Anti-Flag” and had over a million likes, were permanently deleted.
We wrote to the complaint email address in the YouTube copyright alert, and asked B-site for the reason and basis of the complaint and its response to the incident, but we have not received a reply by press time.
Recent Comments