Note to editors.
On February 9, 2021, Hu Xijin, editor-in-chief of the Global Times, commented on the “Clubhouse blocked” issue on Weibo. In addition to his typical “Hu Xijin style” commentary, he also mentioned that he was “hacked” on several Clubhouse rooms and that he was “quite hot”. During the Clubhouse “Hu insult” orgy, some netizens used a political spoof language randomization application, the “Hu Editor Generator”, to generate comments to flirt with Hu Xijin. The application was also brought back into the netizens’ view.
On March 14, after “Zhao Bomb Magnet” and “Geng Shuang Simulator”, a new member of the political spoof language random generation application, Hu Editorial Generator, was added, this Time for This time it is used to generate “Hu Xi Jin style” text comments.
The author of this application (project address), HuEditorGenerator, states.
HuEditorGenerator is used to produce Hu-style comments, so that when something new happens, the first comment is generated and published, so that it can immediately seize the high ground of public opinion and win a great victory.
Based on “Bullsh*tGenerator”, a corpus from Hu.
The following is a Hu-style commentary generated by the author with the keyword Bullsh*tGenerator.
Test article topic: Bullsh*tGenerator
As far as Laohu is concerned, the significance of the h*tGenerator to Laohu cannot be overstated. Recently on the Internet about the problem of Hu editorial generator, Laohu also saw the reaction of all parties is very strong. I saw a report that the Hu editorial generator can be solved in this way, I think this approach is worth studying reference. As long as everyone is sincere, the problem can always be solved.
The situation with the Hoopla Generator has caused strong dissatisfaction in public opinion. In addition to the public opinion itself there are some grievances caused by the hoochie generator, there are also other reasons why Laohu feels that the hoochie generator is really unwarranted. The hooch generator is destined to leave a deep impression on the Chinese people, and some people worry that China will not engage in deep reflection, I don’t see it that way. I believe that the problem is fairly obvious, and that China’s reflection has been going on since the Hu editorial generator. Some things are not said openly, but we can find clear evidence of many of these reflections in progress. This, then, is the embodiment of a complex China.
For Laohu, the Hu editorial generator is not only a major event, but also something worth thinking about. Laohu feels that, in fact, in the age of social media, it is relatively easy to form this kind of instantaneous and concentrated release, because there is almost no cost, that’s all. Laohu is also after a lot of thought, in every day and night thinking about this issue.
For the Hu editorial generator, Laohu has a basic judgment so dazzling information game, half a day a thing can roll back and forth. To be honest, even the old man like Laohu is sometimes difficult to distinguish which information is true, which is false, which belongs to the wrong, which is made by someone malicious.
In Laohu’s opinion, the reason for the process of and reasons for the occurrence of the hoochie generator is to remind the current case of some flaws and problems exposed. I think the general public opinion around the Hoax Generator has changed. Laohu feels that a lot of people have been aggrieved by the recent events of the Hu Weixian Generator. The inconvenience caused to those people by the hoochie generator can be imagined.
The first time I saw it, I had to go to the bathroom to get it.
Basic common sense|Following Hu editor to learn bullshit
Other netizens had briefly summarized Hu Xijin’s comment format routine as follows.
“Recently the Internet appeared _, Laohu also saw _, know that everyone is very _, Laohu can not help but to verbose a few words, although _ does exist in part _, but _, finally Laohu appeal __“
At present, there are already users on the “Hu editor generator” test, very interesting, such as test “eat shit:”
CDT editors also conducted tests with the themes of “Xi Jinping personally commanded” and “Li Wenliang’s death”, and the overall impression is that it does have Hu Xijin’s style of writing, saying a lot but seemingly saying nothing, but the words “mash The purpose of “glue” + “gripping the plate to maintain stability” is clear.
The old Hu commented that “Xi Jinping personally commanded”.
The following is the full text.
Many people don’t want to read the report of Xi Jinping’s personal command, and I can’t bear to read it either, because I feel uncomfortable just imagining it.
It is time to refute, question and cross-examine Xi Jinping’s personal command, but not to fabricate false information. No matter how much doubt we have, we should not leave the above basic logic. This time it is all about Xi Jinping’s personal command that has been hit hard in the first place. To be honest, when I saw that it was Xi Jinping himself again who was the target of public suspicion and discontent, I felt more or less uncomfortable. In the past two days, there has been a frenzy in many places about Xi Jinping personally commanding. But some of it is not within the realm of reason and should be urgently called off. What Laohu wants to say is that nothing can be done in the event of Xi Jinping personally commanding, but to pursue a co-ordinated balance.
Lu Xun once mentioned, human sorrow and joy are not connected, I just think they are noisy. This does not prohibit Laohu to think deeply, hope that domestic scholars, media people are adhering to the bottom line of seeking truth from facts, in Xi Jinping personally commanded the incident no matter what position they stand on, for what purpose, do not break this bottom line. The main focus of this time is not to look backwards, and Laohu was pleased to see that several mainstream media outlets took the lead yesterday in focusing on the Xi Jinping personal command incident and reported on it. I hope that the mainstream media’s focus on this issue will expand into a focus for the entire community. I would like to relay this message to the public for your information.
At the same time, Laohu must say, Laohu once mentioned, many people scolded the joy, and also said how the history of how. Well, I reply to you with a straight face: your words on Weibo will surely disappear, and when people in the future come back to inquire about history, they will suddenly find that among all the media in the whole mainland, only the Global Times has recorded every major piece of real history on paper. This is the best way we can tell history.
This does not prohibit Laohu to think deeply, we still remember, just a few days ago, certain media hype Xi Jinping personally commanded. Before the words were out, another scandal broke out that Xi Jinping personally commanded the real one. I don’t think it’s too much for society to do this, I think the reflection on Xi Jinping’s personal command is a sign of society’s strong enterprising spirit, we always think we still have room for improvement and are very worried about correcting mistakes not being complete. In fact, Laohu has always been a great admirer of improvement and more profound reform, and we tend to move quickly in doing so. Laohu has something to say today that may be scolded. I saw a report that Xi Jinping personally commanded can be solved in this way, I think this approach is worth studying reference. As long as everyone is sincere, the problem can always be solved. Xi Jinping’s personal command has caused strong discontent in public opinion. In addition to the fact that public opinion itself has some grievances caused by Xi Jinping’s personal command, there are also other reasons why Laohu feels that Xi Jinping’s personal command is really unwarranted.
Laohu comments on “Li Wenliang’s death”.
As a member of the media, Laohu calls on all concerned to take the death of Li Wenliang as a lesson. The country that focuses on handling problems is ultimately respectable, as Laohu said in an offhand way. This does not prohibit Laohu to think deeply, hope that domestic scholars, media people are adhering to the bottom line of seeking truth from facts, in the case of the death of Li Wenliang no matter what position they stand on, for what purpose, do not break this bottom line. Laohu once mentioned, “Some people say I am the ‘four villains’, ‘ten villains’, let them say it, it does not matter. I do not know whether I am a great evil or vicious? This does not prohibit Laohu deep thinking, Laohu would like to say that in the case of Li Wenliang’s death, nothing can be done, but to pursue a co-ordinated balance. The old Hu today slightly to sort out the process and causes of the death of Li Wenliang occurred, in order to remind the current case of some of the flaws and problems exposed. Li Wenliang’s death has quickly gathered attention on the Internet. I don’t think this incident has much to do with the current big picture. Laohu myself is more concerned about the direction or why Li Wenliang’s death happened so easily, and what kind of interest drive led to the disregard for risk? At the beginning of this blog post, Laohu called for an official statement on Li Wenliang’s death. Before this statement comes, I would like to clarify some basic logic with netizens.
Recent Comments