The “consultation theory” generated by the Chief Executive set off a debate in the pro-establishment camp, and strongly defended the actions of Tsang Yu-sing in accordance with the Basic Law, by the coveted re-firing of Leung and his personal bodyguard Cheung Chi-kong fierce attack. An article by Zhang said that Zeng Yucheng’s “heart is punishable”, which is similar to Yao Wenyuan’s criticism of “Hai Rui’s dismissal” in 1965, which later turned out to be an attempt to uncover Liu Shaoqi. The fishy wind and blood of the Cultural Revolution has been smelled. Not only to knock down the democrats and the opposition across the board, but also to topple the local Hong Kong establishment, as long as you sincerely uphold the Basic Law and one country, two systems.
Tsang Yu-sing graduated with first class honors in mathematics from the University of Hong Kong in 1968 and gave up the opportunity to pursue further studies in the United States to join a leftist school as a low-paid teacher. His early identification with the motherland and pursuit of his ideals cannot be doubted.
In 1992, the Chinese Communist Party formed the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB) with teachers from leftist schools as the main force, using the slogan “Stay in Hong Kong, build Hong Kong, be sincere for Hong Kong” to confront the democratic forces, of which Tsang was the founding chairman. In 1994, it was revealed that he had arranged with his wife and daughter to emigrate to Canada. In 1994, it was revealed that he had arranged with his wife and daughter to emigrate to Canada, which I ridiculed in my article as a “sincere deception of Hong Kong”, and the community also jokingly referred to him as “Space Shing”. However, he finally did not leave Hong Kong and insisted on practicing “staying and building Hong Kong”.
For nearly 30 years since he started his political career, I have been confronted with him in terms of speech. When he was a Legislative Council member, his words and actions were certainly open to question; but when he was the President of the Legislative Council, I cannot help but say that he did act fairly and in accordance with the rules of procedure.
I have not talked much with Tsang in private. Based on my decades of experience in following Hong Kong’s political situation closely, I think he is at least sincere in his support for one country, two systems, and wants to make Hong Kong people ruling Hong Kong a reality through his participation. This makes him different from the cunning political frauds.
In 2011, seeing the deepening of the Chinese Communist Party’s involvement in Hong Kong, I wrote an article entitled “Appleseed” in July for the next year’s Chief Executive election, titled “Tsang Yu-sing is the most suitable candidate for the next Chief Executive”. I wrote this article “Apple” because I thought of how to make the successor CE get rid of the slavishness of deliberately flattering and pandering to the Chinese Communist Party: First, to make Beijing have confidence in the successor’s loyalty to the Party, without constantly reminding him to “love the country and Hong Kong” (in fact, “love the Party”); and “Second, the successor will listen to and cooperate with the Central Government’s intentions from the standpoint of protecting the interests of Hong Kong and safeguarding one country, two systems, instead of always trying to figure out and cater to the Central Government’s intentions that are not there; Third, he himself belongs to the traditional leftist camp, so he is not “pro” to the leftists and The conclusion is that only one person is the most suitable. The conclusion was that only one person was the most suitable, and that was Zeng Yucheng.
The subsequent development proves that the Chinese Communist Party cannot accept a person who really acts in accordance with the “two systems”, and such a person can never be the Chief Executive, then a senior official or a member of the Executive Council, and then a Legislative Council member, and then a disobedient District Council member. Zhang Zhigang’s argument is that democratic elections are about “seizing power” and consultation is about the central government leading everything. Although the Chief Executive election is only a small circle, but support for the election is to support the seizure of power, “their hearts can be punished.
History keeps repeating itself: over the past hundred years, from joining the Communist revolution with full of enthusiasm, joining the Communist resistance against Japan, to supporting the Communist “liberation” after the war, many people did not end up well, and it was the inevitable fate that the rabbit would die and the dog would be cooked. Zeng Yucheng’s whole Life experience, although not to this extent, but also not too far away.
In the Soviet era, there was a wise topic: sincerity, intelligence and party spirit are three qualities that a person can only have two.
A young man took me on this topic and asked Zeng Yucheng which two he had, and he quickly answered: I have none of the three.
Too smart. His Chinese and English literacy, Education and talent are unparalleled in leftist political circles. As for sincerity or party spirit, he would have been in a tangle, I think. He first entered politics as a leftist and was stopped from running for Chief Executive in 2012, so I believe he was abandoned early on for being patriotic and protecting Hong Kong.
The reverse elimination is the inevitable result of the authoritarian system; distrust of local forces is a tradition of the Chinese Communist Party. Therefore, it is said that the Bauhinia Party has replaced the DAB and Li Xiaojia as the Chief Executive.
Recent Comments