Survey or exchange?

The outbreak of the New crown outbreak in Wuhan in late 2019 was delayed by an official Chinese gag, which delayed the containment of the outbreak. After Wuhan took extreme measures to close the city, traffic in major domestic cities was tightly controlled, but Chinese Communist authorities let international flights run at full capacity, allowing the virus to spread rapidly around the world. The WHO, however, sang the same tune as the CCP and gave credit to the CCP for its words and actions. Many countries, especially the United States, strongly condemned the CCP’s concealment and delay and the WHO’s shielding, and even cut off economic aid to the WHO and withdrew from it; more than 100 countries around the world demanded that the WHO conduct an independent investigation into the source of the outbreak. But the Chinese Communist Party kept using various excuses to refuse. It was only a year after the outbreak that the Chinese Communist Party reluctantly agreed to allow a WHO expert team to enter Wuhan.

The WHO expert team is expected to stay in Wuhan for two weeks, preparing to visit laboratories, wildlife markets and relevant hospitals. The first site visit was extremely important, tweeted Peter Dazak, a member of the WHO expert team. But in Wuhan today, the South China seafood market has long been overhauled; the P4 laboratory equipment, materials and data have been destroyed and hidden; and the visiting hospitals are all prepared for anything. What can the experts investigate? Experts also know this, so the WHO emergency chief Mike Ryan said: there is no guarantee that the investigation can get answers. The WHO does not want the outside world to have high expectations for the investigation. The official rhetoric of the Chinese Communist Party is even more unabashed, saying clearly that the WHO operation is not an investigation, but an exchange and collaboration with Chinese experts on the traceability of the new coronavirus, as part of a global study.

China is also a victim of the new coronavirus, given that for the past year or so, the Chinese Communist Party has been making up bizarre stories and dumping pots and pans on many countries, claiming that the virus in China came from countries such as the United States, Italy, Spain, and possibly from frozen Food imported from China. It can be expected that the WHO is just treating this investigation as a walk-through routine to deliver to the world. Thus, the WHO can continue to make its mark on the world and maintain its monopoly on discourse. The Chinese Communist Party, on the other hand, would love to turn this investigation into an exchange and lead to the assertion that Wuhan is not the source of the virus. In all likelihood, the panel’s report will either be a pie-in-the-sky generalization or a vague endorsement of the CCP’s efforts to dump the virus. Whether this is the case will be seen in two weeks.

Is the new coronavirus naturally occurring or is it synthetic? Sooner or later, science will come to a conclusion. But one thing is certain: publicly available information shows that the P4 lab is indeed working on the coronavirus. So whether the virus is naturally occurring or synthetic, common sense would dictate that the sudden appearance of the virus in Wuhan is no accident, and the possibility of a leak from the P4 lab is the greatest.

This is the intuition and common sense judgment of many people, there is no evidence! But sooner or later the evidence will be disclosed, and the facts will eventually come out!

But it is true that you can not have unrealistic expectations for this investigation that has been transformed into an exchange!