A true ally! Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz (R) said Wednesday, Feb. 3, that I would give up my seat, even my Family, to defend Trump in his impeachment hearings.
Democrats are saving up for the 2020 midterm elections! On Tuesday Biden signed three executive orders on immigration, one of which mandates that federal agencies increase the rate of legal immigrant naturalization.
On Wednesday, Senate Democratic leader Schumer and Republican leader McConnell reached an agreement that the Democrats could control the committee. Former intelligence officer reveals that the Chinese Communist Party may have stolen 80 percent of U.S. adults’ personal assets.
This past week, the World Economic Forum, commonly known as the “Davos Forum,” held its “Agenda Dialogue” online, and the main topic this year was “The Great Reset. The Great Reset. What is “The Great Reset”? What is the essence of “The Great Reset”? And why do some say that the Great Reset is a conspiracy by the global elite?
Florida Rep. Gates: I’d give up my seat, family to defend Trump
The impeachment of former President Trump by the U.S. Senate will be held next Monday, February 8. Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz (R) said Wednesday, Feb. 3, that he would give up his seat and even his family, if needed, to defend Trump in the impeachment hearings.
Gaetz said in an interview with Bannon’s War Room on Feb. 3 that he believes Trump is only getting a low level of defense at this point.
He also said he and fellow Republicans discussed defending President Trump and consulted with the House Committee on Ethics, who told them they would have to give up their congressional seats before they could go to the Senate on the 8th to help defend Trump.
In response, Gates said he loves his district and values his seat in Congress, “but when I think about the way President Trump ended his term and the danger that the end of the Trump (sponsored “America First”) movement poses to our people, both in my district and in this entire country The danger that the people pose.”
He said, “If President Trump asks me to defend him, it will be the biggest thing in my Life. …… I would give up my seat, I would give up my family to defend the greatest president our country has ever had, and I would make sure that he gets a defense that he won’t just give up, that he won’t be afraid to say because he’s worried about losing some neutral Republican lawmakers, a comprehensive defense.”
He also said Trump has done a lot for a great America and that Trump deserves a defense at the impeachment meeting that matches what he has given. “A defense that deserves everything he’s done for this great country.”
Schumer, McConnell reach deal: Democrats can control committees
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) announced Wednesday (Feb. 3) that he and Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) have finally reached a power-sharing agreement.
The agreement will allow Senate Democrats to take control of Senate committees.
Photo: Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) attend an event in the Capitol Rotunda on Feb. 3, 2021.
Speaking on the Senate floor Tuesday, Schumer said, “I’m pleased to report this morning that the bipartisan leadership has finalized the Senate’s organizing resolution. We will pass the Senate resolution today, which means committees can be formed and get to work quickly, working (together) with the Democrats holding the gavel.”
Biden Signs Three Immigration Executive Orders Lawyers Explain Impact on Chinese
On Feb. 2, Biden signed three immigration-related orders reversing the hard-line immigration policies of the Trump era. What are some of the implications of these policy changes for Chinese? Come listen to the lawyer’s analysis.
The three executive orders include.
(i) Establishing a task force to facilitate family reunification.
(b) Re-evaluate legal immigration programs in the United States, including the Central American Minors Program.
(3) Re-examine the Trump-era immigration policy to determine that it is consistent with the U.S. desire to promote “integration and inclusion.
New York immigration attorney Ruth Liu: “It is reasonable to say that Biden has the legal right to veto Trump’s presidential order by way of an executive order, so that all overseas consulates can resume normal processing of overseas immigrants and questioning these issues. But Biden didn’t make those decisions either. This is some logistical aspects may need more Time, that is to say, yesterday signed more of some guiding executive orders, rather than some particularly specific documents.”
Also, Biden’s new order relaxes the criteria for granting political asylum, which will likely return to the 2014 Obama-era criteria, as well as eliminating the Trump Administration‘s immigration public charge (Public charge) rule.
Biden orders higher legal immigration naturalization rate in preparation for election
On Tuesday (2), President Joe Biden signed three executive orders, including one that requires multiple federal agencies to vigorously promote legal immigration and increase naturalization rates in preparation for the 2022 midterm elections and the 2024 presidential election.
Photo: Immigrants hold a naturalization ceremony at the New York office of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) on July 2, 2020.
Hundreds of thousands of legal immigrants are naturalized each year in the U.S. In 2019, more than 843,500 legal immigrants were naturalized as U.S. citizens, an 11 percent increase from 2018. Many mainstream media outlets have reported that this large number of immigrants will help the Democratic Party’s electoral prospects.
Biden hopes that more Democratic voters will turn out in the 2022 midterm elections and the 2024 presidential election. Tuesday’s new order aims to remove barriers in the existing naturalization process and improve it with other methods that would significantly shorten the current naturalization processing time and make it easier for all eligible people to naturalize, including potentially by reducing naturalization fees and reinstating the fee waiver process.
Former Intelligence Officer: Communist China May Have Stolen 80% of U.S. Adults’ Personal Assets
On a recent CBS broadcast of 60 Minutes, former U.S. intelligence officials said that the Chinese Communist government may have stolen personal information from 80 percent of U.S. adults.
According to the report, William Evanina, former director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center, warned the American people that the Chinese Communist Party is actively collecting and using DNA and other health-related information on Americans.
Evanina warned the audience about how the Chinese company BGI Group approached six U.S. states with offers to help build and operate coronavirus testing laboratories, as well as examples of “donations” the company promised to make to the states.
Evanina warned the states not to accept UW’s offer because he doubted its motives. UW is a Chinese company, he said, so where would their stuff be? He said, “We need to send a warning not only to every American, but to hospitals, health associations and clinics.”
He said, “An estimated 80 percent of American adults currently have had their personally identifiable information stolen by the Chinese Communist Party.”
Davos Pushes Big Reconfiguration of Global Elite Deep Plan
Due to the Epidemic, the Davos Agenda Dialogue, held from Jan. 25 to 29, was held by videoconference for the first time and centered on the hot topic “The Great Reset.
On the official website of the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the Forum, said that the Great Reset is the first of its kind. Klaus Schwab, founder and Executive Chairman of the Forum, is prominently pictured on the official website with the phrase: “The epidemic offers us a rare and fleeting opportunity to reflect, reconfigure and advance the world’s recovery.”
The World Economic Forum brings together more than 3,000 of the world’s elite in politics, business, academia, science and technology, and media from more than 110 countries.
In October 2020, Schwab and Frenchman Thierry Malleret were invited to the event. On the cover of the book, a Rubik’s Cube is being twisted and “reshaped”, which seems to suggest the future of the world.
In this book, Schwab talks about the “Great Reimagining” in all aspects of the world, including the economy, society, geopolitics, the environment, technology, and industries and businesses, to name a few. Schwab has proposed the design of reconstruction at the macro and micro levels, and even at the human level.
At the Davos Agenda Dialogue in January, these contents of the book were integrated into the seven aspects of the “Great Reconfiguration”, including harnessing the fourth industrial revolution, strengthening regional development, and revitalizing global cooperation. Each of these seven areas contains multiple branches.
This dynamic diagram, which seems to stretch downward, makes people marvel at how detailed and complete the system of the “Great Reconfiguration” has been designed! It is like walking into a maze, and it is easy to get caught up in it and not see the whole picture.
Why does Schwab want to promote the topic of “The Big Reimagining”?
In his article “The New “Year Zero”?” published on January 15, Schwab says in which Schwab says: “Seventy-five years after the ‘Year Zero’ of World War II, we once again have the opportunity to rebuild the world”, and that “neoliberalism,” that is The “neo-liberal”, or “free market and limited government” model of development is bankrupt, and the Chinese Communist virus (COVID-19) has given it the final blow, and the world must be “greatly reconstructed”.
Last October, Schwab also published an article in Time Magazine’s official website, “A Better Economy Is Possible. Do It)
So what is Schwab’s so-called “better economy”?
In the preface to Post-Epidemic: The Great Reimagine, Schwab says, “China’s rapid recovery shows that a ‘great reimagine’ is possible after the threat of the epidemic has been overcome. Of course, this reconfiguration in no way means going back to the past.”
In other words, Schwab is completely rejecting the capitalist model of development that has allowed Western societies to prosper and progress over the past few decades, while at the same time promoting the Chinese Communist Party’s model of governance.
What is the essence of the “Great Reconfiguration”?
According to the World Economic Forum’s own emphasis, the so-called Great Reconfiguration consists of three main components.
First, the world needs to take drastic measures to deal with the social and economic problems caused by the global plague and to avoid what it claims is “the worst economic recession since the 1930s”.
Second, every country must be involved, and every industry, from oil and gas to high-tech, must be transformed.
Third, the world is completely shifting to a fourth industrial revolution based on digital.
However, many analysts do not agree with the World Economic Forum’s initiative for this Great Reconstruction. For example, regarding economic issues, some analysts believe that the most severe economic recession caused by the epidemic was the result of harsh government measures, that the epidemic was caused by a conspiracy between the Chinese Communist Party and the World Health Organization to cover it up, and that the social and economic problems were caused by countries imitating the Chinese Communist Party’s measures to close cities and economies.
Under the concept of “The Great Reconfiguration,” the development of 5G, artificial intelligence, and digitalization will not only bring great convenience to people, but will also make it easy for people to lose their privacy and implement Orwellian surveillance. When combined with epidemic prevention, it is easy to create a “health dictatorship”. This concern was expressed by former Vatican Archbishop Vigano in the United States, who said, “Vaccinations would be accompanied by a health passport and digital ID card that would allow contact tracing around the world, and those who do not accept these measures would be held in detention camps or under house arrest, and all their property would be confiscated. “
So, there are actions to resist the Great Reconfiguration in Australia, Canada and other countries. For example, on Nov. 17 last year, Canadian Conservative MP Pierre Poiliev, a member of Parliament, said that he would not be able to take part in the “Big Reconstruction. On November 17 last year, Pierre Poilievre, a Canadian Conservative MP, launched a petition to “Resist the Great Reconfiguration”, which attracted thousands of signatures. At the end of November last year, Prime Minister Scott Morrison also said that Australia rejects the “Great Reconfiguration” plan.
Fergus Hodgson, a research associate at the Center for Public Policy Frontiers in the U.S., said the petition would be signed by thousands of people. In an op-ed for the Epoch Times, Fergus Hodgson, a research associate at the Frontier Center for Public Policy, said that the Great Reconfiguration is really about socialism around the world through environmentalism and globalism.
Indeed, much of the “Great Reconfiguration” coincides with the goals of the communist global revolution.
Here, we should mention a book, The Devil Rules Our World, which mentions the American thinker G. Edward L. K. K., who said, “The Devil rules our world. Edward B. Griffin G. Edward Griffin, summarizes the five goals of the communist global revolution: first, to confuse, dismantle and destroy capitalist forces around the world; second, to unite all countries to form a single world economic system; third, to force developed countries to provide long-term financial aid to underdeveloped countries; fourth, to divide the world into regional organizations as a V. After that, the regional organizations can be brought into a single world dictatorship of the proletariat.
One of the seven aspects of the “Great Reconfiguration”, “Revitalizing Global Cooperation,” is to advance the global economy to a large economy through globalization.
For example, the “Great Reconstruction” denies limited government and promotes “big government”, which is very similar to the powerful government under communism.
It is no wonder that Schwab rejects the capitalist development model while promoting the socialist model of the Communist Party.
Some people therefore speculate that Schwab’s “Great Reconstruction” should be taken from the Chinese Communist Party. We do not know if this is the case, but Schwab is a man who is very close to the Chinese Communist Party.
Recent Comments