It’s rare in history that the results are not in on Election Day 2020 and are still hanging in the balance. It was expected that the results would be seen in the early morning hours of November 4 EST, however, with Trump leading the vote count, many key swing states abruptly announced that they would stop counting.
As of 2:00 a.m. ET on November 4, Trump had a clear lead in several key states Pennsylvania (20 electoral votes), Georgia (16), Michigan (16), and North Carolina (15), and in some cases, hundreds of thousands of votes over Biden. Once Trump took these four states, the electoral votes will be more than 290 to win easily. However, more than one state suddenly called a halt to the counting of votes, or announced that the mail ballots will be counted later, resulting in a bizarre reversal of the election results.
At present, the general election fraud has become the focus of widespread concern. We can observe and analyze some of the anomalies in this election.
- michigan: suspicions beyond the surge of bizarre ballots
In a highly unusual scene during the Michigan vote count, when Trump was leading Biden by nearly five percentage points, the total suddenly rose from 4,261,878 to 4,400,217 votes, for a total increase of 138,339 votes, exactly the same as Biden’s vote increase.
This means that nearly 140,000 consecutive votes without exception went to Biden, and none to Trump. Statistically, the probability of this happening is infinitely close to zero.
However, it was these nearly 140,000 votes that suddenly narrowed the gap between Biden and Trump’s vote share to less than 2 percentage points. A screenshot of the vote was uploaded to Twitter by a US election watcher and immediately sparked widespread interest and retweets.
The issue was later shown to be a typo by the messenger, Decision Desk HQ. An extra zero was accidentally added to Biden’s added data at some point, causing it to skyrocket tenfold. Although questions about the “140,000 bizarre votes” were answered, concerns were raised about other similar but undetected errors in the counting process.
In addition, the state’s Antrim County is typically a Republican chassis. 23,365 people were counted in the 2018 census. However, initial results showed that Biden received 62.5 percent of the vote out of more than 12,000 votes cast, compared to 36.3 percent for Trump. State Rep. Triston Cole, a Republican, told a local radio station that the results were suspect.
New information also broke online. Someone in the Michigan Post Office reported that his supervisor said to postmark those mail-in ballots that didn’t arrive at the post office until the day after the Nov. 4 election with a Nov. 3 postmark so they could pass. “Separate them from standard mail so that they can be stamped ‘yesterday’s date’ test to pass.”
In fact, Michigan requires mail-in ballots to be postmarked earlier than 8 p.m. on Nov. 3 in order to be included in the count.
On Nov. 4, the Trump team is already pursuing legal action to stop the continued counting of ballots in the state.
- Wisconsin: Those “phantom ballots” for Biden.
Current events commentator Professor Tianliang Zhang, who has been following the race on election night, noticed a bizarre late shift in Wisconsin’s vote. When the state’s vote count went from 94 percent to 95 percent, Biden’s vote count suddenly increased by 100,000.
It’s worth noting that when the state’s votes were counted to 95%, it showed a total of 3.62 million votes, which means the total (including counted and uncounted) was 3.62 million / 0.95 = 3.81 million, so 1% is 38,100 votes, less than 40,000 votes. Why did Biden’s vote count increase by 100,000 when the 1% increase from 94% to 95% – less than 40,000 votes?
Taking a step back, even if the 1% of new votes were for Biden, where did the extra 60,000+ votes come from?
In Wisconsin, when the vote count rose from 94% to 95%, the number of new votes was nearly 40,000, but Biden’s vote count increased by 100,000, giving him at least 60,000 more “phantom votes”.
- Georgia: “They threw out the scrutineers and secretly counted the votes.”
On November 4, ET, David Shafer, chairman of the Georgia Republican Party, tweeted out that in Fulton County, in the north central part of the state, counting agents drove Republican scrutineers home when they lied about closing the polls, and then those counting agents secretly continued to count the votes. Why did they announce that they were stopping the count, but secretly continued to count behind the scenes?
On the same day, David also broke the story that in Chatham County, Georgia, Republican observers spotted an unidentified woman mixing more than fifty ballots into a pile of uncounted absentee ballots.
- actual voter turnout in multiple states far exceeded the number of legally registered voters
Normally, the number of voters is smaller than the number of registered voters, because the probability that all of the tens of thousands of registrants will vote successfully is extremely low. Therefore, normal turnout is usually less than 100%. However, statistics show that the actual number of voters in many U.S. states this year far exceeded the number of legally registered voters in their respective states.
For example, Nevada had only 1,277,000 registered voters, but more than 1,590,000 ballots were actually cast, more than 300,000 more than the actual number of ballots cast, a turnout of 125% (Figure 3). In the state, as of 11 p.m. ET on Nov. 4, the total vote count was 75 percent, with Biden leading Trump by less than 1 percentage point and less than 10,000 votes. This means that election fraud is likely to be far more actionable than the difference in vote share between the two candidates, making the general election far less credible.
Similarly, in many swing states, turnout was over 105%, meaning that actual voter turnout exceeded legitimate registration by at least 5 percentage points, which could easily reverse the outcome of an election if one side engaged in election fraud.
Actual voter turnout in multiple states far exceeded the number of legally registered voters. (Turnout = actual voter turnout/legal registrations; data from RealClearPolitics.com, https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/number-of-registered-vo…)
- the media’s dramatic leftward drift and false polls
In addition to election fraud, the mainstream media’s significant leftward leaning, is also likely to lead to the election unfair important factors.
The United States “media research center” in the recently released survey report shows that the election, the United States three major media ABC, CBS and NBC in the past three months, the negative coverage of Trump as high as 92%, while the negative coverage of Biden is only 34%.
The mainstream media’s favoritism towards Biden is more vividly demonstrated in the Biden family’s “computer-gate” scandal. Most of the mainstream media turned a blind eye to the computer-gate scandal, playing deaf and dumb in the face of all the human and material evidence, and adopting a three-no policy of no investigation, no interview, and no report.
In addition, the U.S. newspaper industry has a tradition of endorsing presidential candidates in presidential elections. This year, more than 100 newspapers and media across the United States have expressed their support for Biden, and it is particularly noteworthy that USA Today, a major newspaper in the United States, has never endorsed any presidential candidate since it was founded in 1982, but now, against the backdrop of the widespread exposure of the Biden family scandal, it has publicly declared its support for Biden. By comparison, fewer than 10 newspapers have endorsed Trump.
Trump has lamented that his biggest opponent is not Biden or the Democratic Party, but the corrupt media.
Moreover, America’s mainstream pollsters were tragically beaten by the election results back in 2016. This year, the pollsters were more flamboyant than in 2016, predicting Biden’s lead over Trump by nearly eight points a week before the election, which turned out to be a general election in which Trump took many of the states where he himself was polling behind.
In fact, a large percentage of people in this year’s election don’t trust the polls at all. And yet, poll publishers are still happy to update and release false polling data, for what purpose? Much of it is bandwagoning, disguised as political propaganda, cheering up leftist voters while misleading centrist voters.
- social media bias, high tech companies imposing unfair scrutiny
In addition to the smears of traditional media such as television and newspapers, President Trump has to face the bias of social media and the unfair political trials of high-tech companies.
As we all know, Trump often posts on Facebook, Twitter and other social media platforms in order to combat the mainstream media’s fake news and make his voice heard by the American public.
However, in this year’s election, Facebook and Twitter have directly wielded the ‘Chinese Communist Party-style speech censorship’ stick to suppress posts and videos that are detrimental to the Democratic Party’s campaign, and even directly blocked them. For example, the New York Post was tweet-blocked for exposing the Biden family scandal. The acting director of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Mark Morgan, was blocked for tweeting that Trump’s border wall policy had been effective, which was labeled an “act of hate” by Twitter. Just a few days before the election, a Facebook group with nearly 30,000 members called New Jersey Women for Trump was blocked by Facebook for no apparent reason.
Early on the morning of Nov. 4, as the states’ counts were coming in and the results were becoming clear, Trump made two posts on Facebook and Twitter, one of which read, “Tonight I will make a statement. Big win!” The post was tagged by Facebook as fact-checking, and when you clicked on it, it turned out to be Facebook’s own tally center, in which Trump received far fewer electoral votes than most of the media’s presumed preliminary results. In another post, Trump said: “We have a huge lead, but they want to steal the election results. We will never let them get away with it. When the polls close, the votes cast don’t count!” The posting, which was restricted by Facebook and Twitter, was also removed from the corporate motto of “no evil”.
In June 2019, a secret video was released, in which Google executive Jen Gennai said that Google had been working since 2016 to train and improve its AI algorithms in an attempt to influence search results. The way to influence the U.S. election and thus prevent the re-election of Trump 2020. Google’s Youtube platform also does political censorship of videos, yellow-tagging many videos that are unfavorable to the Democratic Party, using economic pressure to force Youtuber to self-censor and reduce his voice for Trump, the Republican Party and traditional ideas. In addition, Google Translate also cooperates with the falsification and misleading of Chinese users. For example, typing “Biden just lost the election” translates into Chinese as “Biden just won the election.” ……
- Where does the confidence come from in Biden’s election campaign?
Starting in mid-October, when President Trump attends campaign events around the world to build momentum, there are always crowds of supporters. And at Biden campaign rallies, attendees were often door-to-door, and cars were often pulled in as spectators. What’s more, it’s not uncommon for Democrats to turn on the water in the early days of the election.
Nonetheless, seeing Trump’s campaign momentum skyrocketing at frequent rallies, Biden doesn’t seem to be in a hurry, often hiding in his basement and rarely coming out for major canvassing events. Biden seems to be confident about whether he will win the general election. He told voters at a small rally before the election that he didn’t need those votes to be elected president.
So where exactly does Biden’s confidence come from? Could it be related to election fraud? Before the election, Biden came off the record in an interview and said, “I think (we’re going to win), (because) we’ve formed the most extensive and inclusive election fraud organization in the history of American politics.”
If Biden was the big truth that slipped through the cracks, one might have no trouble understanding why Pelosi also let slip that “Biden will win, no matter what the outcome of the November 3 vote.”
Conclusion.
Although the election is still in a sticky situation, the unorthodox rhetoric of the left seems to be glaringly obvious in comparison to the bizarre situation that has emerged.
The final outcome of this election is being watched not only by the United States, but by the entire world. The American democratic system is a model for the world, and the final outcome of this election will have major implications. I believe that President Trump, the voters and the general public will not agree that an election of the century has been so unfairly manipulated, and an effort to seek justice and truth will surely unfold accordingly.
We may as well wait and see.
Recent Comments