In fact, if we observe the lawsuits that Google has suffered in the past decade, including antitrust investigations, we will find that the American market, including Europe, is very dissatisfied with the dominance of Google, which shows dominance, while foreign antitrust laws are more stringent than domestic ones, and for a giant like Google, it seems that it has completed a dominant position in product form, challenging the monopoly laws all the time!
But among these technology companies is not only Google, many super giants in the United States have monopoly properties, and across hardware and software, so this is not just Google’s trouble, but more technology giants trouble, I’m afraid that everyone wants to be like Intel has a never can threaten their AMD, but the Internet products need more is the number of users and the number of resources mastered, in this resource and the interests of the drive, will have to go to a dominant.
On the one hand, the anti-monopoly laws under the European and American legal systems are really strict, in order to combat these giants and influence the breeding of new forces, on the other hand, they are also afraid of these giants taking advantage of their monopoly position to do some things that transcend the law and remain undiscovered. So I’m afraid we’ll see a fragmented Google in the future, but even so, it’s just a solution to compromise the monopoly law in the end.
On the contrary, some domestic Internet giants, in fact, relying on their own near-monopoly characteristics, exercise some so-called two choose one or suppress the competition and so on a series of unimportant business, I am afraid that these are the real violation of the monopoly law, the real need to be governed and suppressed.
Recent Comments