The storming of Congress is a pre-set trap for the left! Former New York Mayor Giuliani explains what is suspicious about the events in Congress. Will House Speaker Perosi’s computer theft trigger treason? Chief commentator Wang Duk-ran comments.
Gingrich, a Republican patriarch and former Speaker of the House, recently wrote an article about why he did not accept Biden as president.
The law professor involved in the former impeachment case bluntly pointed out that impeaching Trump would cause long-term harm to the U.S. Constitution.
Immediate effect! Twitter users exodus, Gab daily increase of 500,000 people, Trump also download.
3 dead and 4 injured! Crazy gunman indiscriminately kills Chinese student at the University of Chicago, killed by a bullet to the head.
Law professor involved in former impeachment case: impeaching Trump would undermine the Constitution
In response to the impeachment motion initiated by Democrats, Jonathan Turley, a lawyer who was involved in the 2019 impeachment hearings, said President Trump did not have inflammatory language in his speech to his supporters before the incident that rocked Congress. He warned that continuing to push the impeachment agenda would cause long-term damage to the U.S. Constitution.
In an opinion piece in The Hill on Saturday (Jan. 9), he noted that a swiftly initiated new impeachment would undermine the U.S. Constitution.
Photo:Jonathan Turley, a professor at George Washington University Law School.
According to the article, the Democratic Party seeks to launch a second impeachment against Trump for sedition, which would completely destroy not only the constitutional standard for impeachment but also the freedom of speech in the U.S. This action, taken just days before the end of Trump’s term, is hasty and crazy.
He pointed out that the Democrats want to remove Trump based on the speech he gave to supporters before he stormed Congress, but that Trump’s speech does not meet the definition of “incitement” under the criminal code and would be considered a protected speech by the Supreme Court.
Turley, who is not a Trump supporter, acknowledged that while Trump’s speech was widely and “justifiably” condemned, it is true that he never called for violence or riots. Trump urged supporters to ask members of Congress to oppose certifying the Electoral College vote results, but he told the crowd to “let your voices be heard in a peaceful and patriotic way.
Turley also noted that Democrats have challenged the electoral vote in the past on the basis of the law, and that Trump called on the crowd to “walk down Pennsylvania Avenue,” a march that is a common form of protest in the United States. Trump did not call for illegal action, he only called for people to protest in front of Congress.
The article further notes that, in addition, violence was not imminent, as the vast majority of the thousands of protesters were not violent prior to the march, and most did not riot inside the Capitol. Like many violent protests over the past four years, the crimes were committed by only a small group of instigators. The Capitol Police were aware of the march, but declined help from the National Guard because they thought violence was unlikely.
Turley argued that Trump’s statements are covered by the First Amendment, so for Congress to now seek to impeach him for those statements would set a precedent that any president can be impeached for using reckless language that triggers accusations of violence by others.
Turley commented that the basis for impeachment, as advocated by Democrats, is more extreme than an infamous 1919 U.S. Supreme Court decision that would ultimately cause long-term damage to the U.S. Constitution.
Storming Congress is a pre-set trap for the left, Giuliani explains the suspicions
After the U.S. Congress was stormed on Jan. 6, Democrats, some Republicans and the mainstream U.S. media accused Trump of encouraging his supporters to create the riot. But evidence is mounting that the incident may have been a set-up by Trump’s opponents. Former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani posted a Youtube video explaining the suspicious aspects of the incident. But the video was quickly deleted by Youtube officials.
Photo:President Trump’s personal lawyer Giuliani posted a video explaining the suspicious aspects of the congressional storming incident. (Screenshot of the video)
- The riot in Congress was planned before the “Save America” rally, because they had ropes, hammers, sticks, and even special tools for breaking glass and chemicals, milk that can wash away tear gas, and several people who are especially good at climbing walls.
- There is video and evidence at the scene that most of the people who entered the Capitol were let in by Capitol Hill police.
- People who entered the Capitol brought walkie-talkies and advanced camera equipment.
- A witness testified, “I heard them say, ‘We’ve got to stir up the pot and make these people look bad.’ I saw them smash a glass on Capitol Hill.”
Giuliani said Trump supporters did not create outrage or go overboard at the Jan. 6 rally, though the Democratic Party, which controls the mainstream media, wants to blame Trump for the riots, “I don’t believe in violence, I don’t think violence solves anything, and I believe violence is often used to discredit decent causes…Unfortunately politics and violence sometimes are intertwined. In terms of public opinion right now, as you can predict, is that because the mainstream media is so hateful of Trump and the mainstream media is controlled by Democratic politicians, they are ready to blame Trump for the riots.”
The video was quickly removed from Youtube. It was part of the abuse of power and frantic strangulation rhetoric by the US high-tech giants after January 6.
Wang Dukran’s analysis: Perosi’s computer theft was also a trap
Retired Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerny said on January 8 on the WeloveTrump.com website that U.S. Special Forces conducted a “White Hat” operation during the January 6 break-in of the U.S. Congress by Black Name and Antifa posing as patriots, stealing the computer of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. The computer of the Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi, and broke the news that a large amount of treasonous evidence was saved in the computer. So, it is absolutely extraordinary that she is eager to impeach President Trump. But chief commentator Wang Duyan gave the opposite comment.
Wang Dukran analyzed that this was a trap first after the Capitol Hill riots on January 6, and will not address that part now. Since this is a trap, everyone naturally knows that Perosi is a person in the know, even if he is not the mastermind. With Perosi’s position, why would a person with primary knowledge of the situation have an open computer waiting for someone to come and get it? The only explanation for this is that this computer was a decoy, showing that the mob stole state secrets and could frame Trump’s manipulation of the mob as a threat to U.S. national security, which is an aggravating circumstance.
Why I don’t accept Biden as president -Former Speaker of the House speaks out
A few days ago, Gingrich, a Republican patriarch and former Speaker of the House, wrote an article in the Washington Times about why he did not accept Biden as president.
Gingrich said, In those four years, I witnessed the left’s persistent rejection of President Trump and spent all of its energy denying the results of the 2016 election. It took me days to clear my head.
As I fell into contemplation, I realized that it wasn’t just the votes that I was angry and fearful about. My motivation for not wanting to accept the election results was rooted in a strong sense of outrage as well as loneliness that had never been present in my six decades of political life.
The world of the left is the world of the establishment. For most of my life, I have been dominated by the invisible forces of this world.
When the freedom of the press is violated, the press as well as the media will group together in revolt. Where is that hypocritical quote, ‘Democracy dies in the dark’? The tragedy is that the Washington Post itself, became part of the darkness. But that was just the beginning. When Twitter censored four of Rush Limbaugh’s (the American conservative host) five tweets, I was worried for this country.
I worry for this country when those Internet oligarchs censor the speech of the President of the United States.
I worry for this country when I see that billionaires like Zuckerberg can spend $400 million to buy municipalities simply to maximize turnout in certain Democratic districts, in total disregard of election-related laws.
When I read that Apple has an ironclad ‘never piss off China’ rule, and when I see the NBA cave in to China, I worry for this country. When I see news after news of election fraud coming out and no media attempt to investigate, I know something is very sick.
The entire election process was the last straw that broke the camel’s back, accelerating and deepening the crisis of confidence in America. Beyond the obvious fraud, there were shocking things, any one of which could have rewritten the election results.
In every swing state, officials violated local laws and sent ballots to every registered voter. All of this behavior was clearly documented in the Texas lawsuit, only to be dismissed by the Supreme Court on the grounds of procedural noncompliance, not because of the lawsuit itself. This is what this election really looks like.
Meanwhile, it is clear that every swing state did not follow the normal process of validating mail-in ballots. Compared to previous elections, this year’s ballot invalidation rate is ridiculously low. In Georgia, the voiding rate dropped from 6.5% in 2016 to 0.2% this year. In Pennsylvania, it dropped from 1 percent in 2016 to 0.003 percent this year. Nevada dropped from 1.6 percent to 0.75 percent. There is only one explanation: they received a lot of ballots that should have been voided in previous years, and the mail-in ballots favored Biden. This is what this election really looks like.
For four full years, the entire establishment was mobilized to boycott the elected president, as if they were the immune system that was wiping out the virus. Now they are turning around and saying we are destroying democracy.
If Biden had ruled the country the left-wing way, which he would almost certainly have been forced to do, the numbers would have been higher and we would have won big (midterm elections) in 2022.
In this case, I have no interest in endorsing as President of the United States a man whose son has been bought by a rival state. I’m also not interested in pretending to recognize the election results as legitimate. This is just the elite system lingering on the manipulation of the media. This election is about those who broke the law, those who cheated the country, and those who hurt those of us who believe in the American spirit, who respect history, and who respect freedom of speech.
As I write these words, I am truly saddened because I believe that America is headed for a deep and troubling situation. This extraordinary, four-year, carefully planned power struggle threatens the very foundation of our nation and the freedom of every American citizen.
Immediate impact! Twitter user exodus: Gab grows by 500,000 per day, Trump downloads too
On January 9, the U.S. social media platform Gab reported that a large number of users migrated from Twitter to Gab, prompting a huge increase in downloads from the platform at a time when Twitter has imposed a broad censorship ban.
In a statement on social media, Gab responded to a user who said he was unable to open an account, saying, “Our traffic has grown 753% in the last 24 hours, with visits growing into the tens of millions.”
“Please be patient, we’re not going anywhere. There are 10 new servers running tonight and it will take some time.” Gab added that more than 500,000 new users were added to the platform on Saturday and said Trump has registered an account with Gab.
In his latest statement on Saturday (Jan. 9), Gab’s chief executive Andrew Torba said, “If your business is built on the backs of Silicon Valley tyrants (Apple, Google, etc.), they can and will try to destroy you if you pose a threat to their interests. That’s what they did with Gab, then Fortnite, and now Parler.”
He said, “There’s all kinds of terrible content on Twitter and Facebook, and everyone on the planet knows that fact. Yet both companies are on the App Store (of both Strogo and Google). Apple’s ban on Parler is not a neutral enforcement of some objective standard, but a cynical, politically motivated gesture and evidence of the Silicon Valley elite’s disdain for the average American.”
Biden inauguration, officials: Vice President Pence to attend
Biden is scheduled to be sworn in on the 20th of this month in Washington, D.C., becoming the 46th president of the United States. A senior government official said on the 10th, Vice President Pence (MikePence) will attend the inauguration ceremony. President Trump announced via Twitter that he would not attend Biden’s inauguration, sparking much discussion.
3 dead and 4 injured! Chinese student at the University of Chicago dies of a gunshot wound to the head in an indiscriminate shooting by a crazed gunman
A 32-year-old African-American gunman, Jason Nightengale, opened fire indiscriminately from south to north, killing three people and injuring four in just a few hours, including a Chinese student, Yiran Fan, 30, who was a fourth-year PhD student in economics and finance at the University of Chicago.
According to the information, Fan Yiran graduated from Beijing University in 2012, and then went to Cambridge University for research, and in 2014 to the University of Chicago to study.
The Chicago Police Department said on the 10th, after a preliminary investigation, the shooter has a number of previous convictions, 8 had posted a video on Facebook, he waved a gun in the video, talking about random killings, and even threatened “I want to let blow up the whole community.
Recent Comments