With 75 million Americans unconvinced that the November 2020 election will be a fair one, inventor Pulitzer believes he can provide a solution that will convince Americans to count their votes in the general election.
Jovan Hutton Pulitzer is the inventor of the “QR code,” which we know is currently used on about 12 billion devices worldwide.
Pulitzer proposes a technological process that can view millions of ballots in a single day and determine whether they are legitimate. By reviewing ballots nationwide, Pulitzer could provide Americans with accurate vote counts for the 2020 election that have been vetted by unbiased machines.
The Gateway Pundit recently interviewed Mr. Pulitzer again, and unlike previous interviews, this one featured Mr. Pulitzer sharing a surprisingly picturesque experience.
Fox News’ Sean Hannity, the host of the popular U.S. show that leads the three major cable news networks in ratings, thought that presenting his program on Hannity’s show would let more Americans know that the fraudulent election results could technically be corrected.
Pulitzer said in the interview that many well-placed people throughout the United States sent messages to Hannity suggesting that he had to talk to Mr. Pulitzer, saying that Mr. Pulitzer had a solution. Mr. Pulitzer later got in touch with Hannity as well.
One day, Pulitzer received a call from a young producer, a woman who was on Hannity’s team and specialized in digital technology-related interviews. The producer told Mr. Pulitzer that it was still difficult for the public to understand the technical issues, so we suggested doing a one-hour radio interview first, which would make the technical issues clearer, and then if Hannity could understand it, he could do a TV interview. Pulitzer thought this suggestion also made sense and agreed.
The female producer originally said she would call back in an hour, but Pulitzer waited a week to hear back from her, and after the producer had fully understood the technical details, the interview was agreed upon.
The producer sent out a conference call invitation email, yet it stated that the producer needed to bring two data scientists to the meeting, which Mr. Pulitzer found odd and brought his own data scientist accordingly.
The producer’s two data scientists, one young but Antifa-looking, and the other a slightly older and more refined Asian, were asked to bring their data scientists to the meeting. The producer asked Mr. Pulitzer to introduce the technology to the two experts, and Pulitzer readily complied, detailing his technical solution and saying, “This is why we chose Hannity’s show specifically to inform the public that we can use Hannity’s show to show Americans that there can be good solutions for recounting votes.
Surprisingly, the producers told Mr. Pulitzer, what are you talking about, Hannity is too stupid to understand this stuff, he’ll never understand this, he’ll just host the show and talk.
Pulitzer told The Gateway Pundit that many Americans love Hannity, believe in Hannity, I know Hannity personally and have friends who know Hannity, but no one has ever called Hannity stupid, nor have colleagues ever used such words to describe others! The producer’s words really opened my eyes.
Meanwhile, the producer kept asking her two data scientists if they could understand Pulitzer’s solution, and one of them asked Pulitzer, “Can you let us use this technique? We’ve been developing our own program, and we’re basically almost done. We’ll have another meeting tonight, we know your program, and our project is close to completion.
Pulitzer said, “Aren’t we talking about how to produce Hannity’s interview? Why are we talking about technology transfer and technology sharing? The female producer replied, Never mind the interview thing!
In the Gateway Pundit interview, Pulitzer sighed at length, “I’m going through another election here! We can’t imagine what kind of agendas are spinning around in their heads.”
Recent Comments