Today I watched a video program of a pawn of a big V of the Industrial Party, talking about the sudden death of a young employee in Pinduoduo. I’m certainly not one of the many fans the Industrial Party has attracted in recent years, but I’ve always been open to learning about their views.
If they are right, they may attack the jade. But this time, I discovered something interesting. The words of the Industrial Party seem to be ineffective, and young Internet users began not to buy it. I am not gloating, but think this trend of public opinion is very meaningful, worthy of attention.
How times change!
Let’s start with some basic background. Ma Qiupu, known online as Ma Supervisor (Gong), Zhihu Big V, known as the representative of the “Industrial Party”.
There may be people who don’t know what the Industrial Party is. So let’s just copy the definition.
“The ‘Industrial Party’ does not have a formal organizational form, but a loosely connected intellectual community and a mixed political trend of thought on the Internet of China in the early 21st century. Its basic feature is that it advocates using the knowledge system of the relationship between the degree of industrialization and social transformation to deal with national development and social governance issues. The ‘Industrial Party’ believes in the supremacy of the nation and industrialization… ; With a clear nationalist stand against liberal online discourse, a huge online fan community and subculture has been formed. (Lu Nanfeng and Wu Jing, Political Analysis of the Internet Trend of Thought of the “Industrial Party”)
We can understand it colloquially as the Industrial Party believed that China was going to overtake and crush the West through industrial power. Industry comes first, efficiency comes first, everything else comes second.
The pawn is the representative of the industrial party, the video is the industrial party’s public opinion position. So what point does the programme make?
This answers the question: Why do some companies pay high overtime and bonuses to encourage employees to work longer hours, rather than hire one more person?
He said:
Man is an animal that thinks quickly and communicates slowly. One of the most important issues for large companies is to save the time cost of communication. If a complex project can be completely entrusted to one person, as far as possible to reduce external communication links, the efficiency will be significantly improved. So big companies like to encourage key employees to work overtime.
This is a novel explanation in the latest discussion of why big companies prefer to “buy lives” rather than lower wages and hire more people. Of course, if you look at labor costs per unit of work, you see that the capitalist is still trying to keep costs down.
But what he said next was even more interesting. ‘If any system wants to stand, it must talk about efficiency,’ he said. There is competition between enterprises and between countries. So we can’t simply limit overtime work. “If a person is found to work more than 8 hours, the company will be fined 100 million”.
Here are the highlights:
From the most basic Marxist point of view, it is meaningless to talk about whether a system is good or not without efficiency. The system that can create advanced productive forces will always defeat other systems. If complex development projects are pushed to others, pushed to foreign countries. If you only do assembly line work that is easy to decompose, then there will be no industrial upgrading.
You can say that I completely stand in the position of the proletariat to consider the problem, and say that refuse to work overtime is the biggest welfare of the migrant workers, but such proletariat and advanced productive forces separated, fast sliding down the feudal guild or rogue proletariat, will soon be eliminated by history. Marx also looked down upon such groups.
The picture
The picture
The picture
The picture
The picture
The picture
Refusing to work overtime will be eliminated by history, refuse to work overtime will become a rogue proletarian, refuse to work overtime will be looked down upon by Marx.
He also contributed a golden sentence: the proletariat if not hard on themselves, there is no future.
The picture
The picture
It was this argument that caused him to roll over. Netizens have accused him of slanting his ass, standing in the boss’s position, betraying the proletariat, or is it a friend of the underclass brothers?
The picture
Looking back at the title of this video, “If a migrant worker doesn’t want to die suddenly, he should be faster than PinduoDuo”, how can a migrant worker be faster than a capitalist? Ma Qianpou’s prescription is “lifelong learning”. The Industrial Party came full circle and reached an agreement with Luo Zhenyu.
But it doesn’t matter. Importantly, the industrialists have always been positive. Why not this time?
The pawn’s logic seems to me to be consistent. How can our industry keep its cost advantage and how can we compete with the west? Do you want to be comfortable for yourself or do you want to crush the West and laugh at the White Left?
Here’s another screenshot:
The picture
The 996 is bad, but in order to maintain international competitiveness, we should give huawei a break on the 996.
But this highly aware molecule is a writer of Observer, not a reader. Pawns this video or overturned, these positive energy netizens why lose the overall view?
In fact, the answer is very simple, children grow up, graduated, personally experienced the social beating.
I couldn’t help but think of that joke again:
Reporter: uncle, if you have ten mu of land, would you like to give half of the harvest to Guo jia?
Big ye: I do!
Reporter: So if it is two villas, are you willing to give one of them?
Grandpa: Yes!
Reporter: What if there were two cars?
Grandpa: Yes!
Reporter: How about the one million dollar prize?
Grandpa: Yes!
Reporter: What about two cows?
Big ye: do not want!!
Reporter: why fields, villas, cars and bonuses, but not cattle?
Grandpa: I really have two cows!
If you had to choose between supporting Huawei and rejecting the 996, which one would you choose?
Don’t laugh at these young Internet users. In my opinion, their changes and their emphasis on the rights and interests of the “individual” are exactly the hope of Chinese society. If a society wants to become good, each person must guard his two cows.
I have always had great confidence in the future of Chinese society because I know young people will grow up.
Recent Comments