Former Hong Kong legislator Lam Cheuk Ting, for July 21, 2019, a large number of people in Yuen Long was attacked indiscriminately by people in white and at the same time injured, first “the plaintiff became the defendant”, was charged with rioting, and then by the former agency ICAC, charged with “disclosure of 7.21 investigated people Lin Zhuo-ting said, he accused 7.21 related personnel, never involved in the current “Prevention of Bribery Ordinance” 30 cases, so the ICAC “the other side of the story”, is entirely political prosecution.
Recently, the government has repeatedly fabricated charges against pro-democracy lawmakers to prosecute them. However, as the government continues to politically prosecute and turn the tables on the victims, even though these cases may not end up in court, they have successfully helped the CCP’s foreign propaganda, so that its media can call a stag a horse.
For outsiders who do not know the content of the incident, such contrary accusations can easily make many people think that “the incident is complicated” and “it is difficult to make a decision”, and take advantage of people’s inertia to successfully reverse right and wrong; for example, the “smuggling” case of Hong Kong people in December. For example, in the 12 Hong Kong people’s “smuggling” case, it was initially claimed that the trial would be held in “video format and behind closed doors”, and then it was suddenly changed to “open trial”; however, the truth is that the so-called “open trial” is However, the truth is that the so-called “public hearing” is “full”, that is, “public” but not accessible, and then no live video broadcast will be arranged. So what does “public” mean? This kind of “1984” Orwellian finger-pointing has become a part of Hong Kong’s daily life, you must agree that 2 + 2 = 5, and there is a lot of “scientific evidence”, “scholarly literature” to “prove “2+2=5, and outsiders want to understand the events, they face the difficulty of having to refute these fallacies.
For example, Asia Weekly, which is often regarded by Hong Kong people as the mouthpiece of the Chinese Communist Party and the provider of jokes to the Hong Kong Communist Party, accused Taiwan‘s Tsai Ing-wen of being the “Emperor Tsai” of the “new authoritarian phenomenon of the green camp behind the elected dictatorship in Taiwan”.
In the case of the 12 Hong Kong people, for example, they have been targeting their family members, and in the case of the Hong Kong Communist Party’s suppression of democrats, there must be some people who come out to specifically target and divide and talk about the situation, and put all the blame on people outside the Hong Kong Communist Party.
A year ago, many people who cared about China’s pro-democracy movement had illusions about the rethinking phenomenon caused by Li Wenliang; now it is the turn of Chinese citizen journalist Zhang Zhan, a former lawyer, to be charged with “provocation and nuisance” for “speculating on the epidemic”, and they only feel deeper despair. As it turns out, instead of being in trouble for hiding the Wuhan pneumonia epidemic, the Chinese Communist Party has “succeeded” in further suppressing human rights, and has grown even stronger. Of course, this “success” is based on the fact that countries are still trapped by the epidemic and are still not firm enough in their policies toward China, but how long can this “luck” with the CCP regime last? When vaccines are in full production and inoculated in all countries, can this tactic of the Chinese Communist Party be sustained in the face of a “post-army lung” world?
Recent Comments