On December 10, 2020, The Federalist broke the story of how Facebook boss Zuckerberg “made the silver bullet” in the election …… Meanwhile, YouTube took the more extreme step of blocking all videos that “questioned the election” after massacring 8,000 channels …… Texas today declared the possibility of “armed independence”.
December’s drama is really climactic
Several of the main characters are fighting to stay out of the poo
Facebook’s Xiaozha suddenly ran to the front desk
It feels like the bento box is already very close
And YouTube bosses waged a censoring war against Republicans
Texas, in addition to fighting to the Supreme Court
It also claimed to use force to defend the “referendum on independence.”
25 states have sided with Texas.
This dynamic could lead to a full-blown civil war.
Text for the garden secret classic American drama of plot interpretation
True House of Cards Season 4, Episode 12 (11)
1
Little Za is the boss behind the subversion war?
Original article by Scott Walter
President, Capital Research Center, USA
Imagine if a billionaire with serious political leanings gave $350 million to a “non-profit organization” in a state that is run by
350 million to a state “nonprofit” run by a party figure who worked for a Karl Rove-linked “money laundering” organization, but used the money to train digital operatives and campaign workers. These workers happened to run presidential elections in dozens of counties. In 2020, these people become the protagonists …… Are Hollywood directors afraid to make this up?
However, this so-called non-profit organization exists, and it has divided its funds into many multi-million dollar “packages” and re-awarded them to local election officials to “help” them “get it right” for the 2020 election results, and this organization has helped county governments buy ballot boxes, vote counters, hired temporary workers for local officials, and assisted them in organizing “voter education” and other activities ……
If, in 2020, a state that normally votes for another party in presidential elections is found to have suddenly swung in favor of the party favored by huge donors in the vote count, and the counties that received “financial help” disproportionately helped one party win the state, the historical pattern of many counties changes dramatically in a heavily skewed direction ……
Even assuming there was a perfect ethical and legal reason for all of this, as there appears to be electoral influence from a wealthy private faction; if, for example, it was a Republican operating all of this, it would be front page news in all of the mainstream media. If a nonprofit organization had shown a Republican bias in the election process, big media outlets like the New York Times would have shown out-and-out outrage. Democratic lawmakers would be screaming “Defend American Democracy.” …… However, this happened on the Democratic side of the aisle, so big media companies and Internet platforms were collectively silent.
“As head of the Capital Research Center, a watchdog group for U.S. nonprofits, I sympathize with angry politicians and am happy to publicly criticize the plan. But right-leaning donors and nonprofits, as far as I know, have made no such conspicuous effort in 2020.”
“We now know that left-leaning, non-governmental donors Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Ms. Chen, gave $350 million in Georgia alone to a nonprofit, the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL), which in turn regranted funds to thousands of local government elected officials across the country. And the entitlement commission has begun a state-by-state study of how those funds are being spent, starting with Georgia (Pennsylvania is next). As I testified before the Georgia Senate on Friday, Georgia’s vote counting numbers are shocking.”
We can’t specify all the money CTCL gave to Georgia counties because the center didn’t disclose that information to the AP or any other media outlet, even though they were required to do so in the next IRS filing (which, efficiently, won’t come until a year from now). However, using local government records and news reports, we found a number of significant “grants”, most of which went to the areas where the largest cities were located, and of course CTCL disclosed which counties received grants, although no details of the amounts were available. It’s worth noting that the CTCL funded less than a third of all counties. (They don’t fund remote counties with few votes)
We have linked the grants to the official vote totals for the counties in question. Here are some of the notable details we found.
90% of CTCL’s largest known grants went to the counties where Joe Biden won.
Nine of the ten counties that shifted the most to Democratic presidential candidates (compared to votes cast from 2016 to 2020) received direct funding from CTCL.
These nine “blue-flipping” grantee counties shifted an average of 13.7% of the vote to the Democratic Party. Cobb and Gwinnett counties were among the four counties that gave the most votes to Biden.
Although CTCL funded more counties than Biden won, across the board, it funded 21 percent of Trump’s winning counties and 55 percent of Biden’s winning counties. Thus, a Biden county is 2.5 times more likely to receive such funding.
CTCL funded all four counties that provided more than 100,000 votes for Biden.
CTCL provided significant funding for these four counties. Each citizen received an average of $4.38 to $10.47.
By comparison, only one Trump-winning county that we know of so far received more than $1 per capita (Cherokee), yet the Democratic vote in that county still jumped 70 percent, while the Republican vote went up only 24 percent. Trump-winning counties like Carroll, Camden and Lumpkin received just about $0.50 or less per capita.
Biden got 33 counties, each bringing him 10,000 votes or more. the CTCL funded 70 percent of them. By contrast, the 46 counties Trump took that gave him 10,000 or more votes were funded by CTCL to only 20 percent of them. Thus, the counties where Biden received the most votes were 3.5 times more likely to be funded than the counties where Trump received the most votes.
In the 44 counties funded by CTCL, the Republican presidential vote increased by 207,000 votes in the last election. The Democratic presidential vote, however, jumped by 530,000, equal to more than 2.5 times the Republican rise.
Do these numbers sound like “non-partisan donations”? If they are indeed nonpartisan, shouldn’t the authorities in Georgia and other battleground states, as well as those in Washington, start investigating what happened and whether the CTCL, which legally prohibits partisanship in elections, is beyond the law? There may be perfectly ethical explanations for all this, namely zero influence of outside political bodies on local elections, but public trust in elections requires avoiding the appearance of conflicts of interest.
I pointed out the obvious questions to Georgia’s senators: How did the relationship between CTCL and the Georgia states begin, and did CTCL reach out first? What preconditions does the center have for its funding? Did the state and county governments meet their budgetary and other obligations under Georgia law in the use of these funds? And who designed the local voter “education” materials and ads?
Here’s a particularly obvious question: Did the organization that used Zuckerberg’s money spend it locally on “training” and was it involved in preventing ballot fraud, such as how to match signatures?
The big question the Georgia legislature should be asking is: Should a California billionaire waltz into this southern state and fund their election agency? Do they want future billionaires to have such unequal and unfair control of electoral resources?
This remains a live issue for Georgia and her constituents as CTCL is already providing more funding for next January’s runoff election for the U.S. Senate. As I told Senator Peach State, some states prohibit such funding. Georgia can, too.
2
YouTube boss orders total deletion of numbers!
As we all know, YouTube (oil tube video) is now owned by Google, and Google’s board boss …… everyone understands, so it makes sense for YouTube to hold high the political correctness stick and block all broadcast channels that have ever questioned cheating in the U.S. election.
As early as Wednesday, YouTube officially announced that it would not allow any users to upload videos about allegations of fraud in this year’s presidential election.
At the same time, the official video-sharing site issued a statement titled “Support the 2020 U.S. Election. However, even so, there are some media channels that “don’t listen,” such as the New York Post, and then the Post’s official channel was blocked ……
The New York Post’s Twitter protest post yesterday
Of course such media outlets have no power against Google
YouTube insists they will no longer allow “allegations of widespread fraud or false content in U.S. elections to taint the results of historic U.S. presidential elections…” (so it seems that Trump’s beloved America has produced such a blatantly human rights-abusing monster)
YouTube issued the massive shutdown one day after the deadline for the so-called “safe harbor” agreement (the date by which state election challenges, recounts and audits must be completed).
In addition, the company said it had removed more than 8,000 channels and thousands of election-related (pro-Trump) videos it deemed misleading since the end of September 2020, allegedly in violation of their “political correctness” policy.
The news has generated a lot of flak on social media, with many small and medium-sized media companies and self-publishers questioning the honesty of YouTube’s decision.
One media personality tweeted, “Youtube will begin censoring anyone who disputes the claim that Joe Biden is president-elect. The court case is now pending and the state electors haven’t voted yet. Regardless, the forces of evil’s allies in the online media will begin their war against the truth.”
Another self-publisher, Barbara, spat, “Hiding the truth from the public won’t change anything! People can see it elsewhere!”
One user questioned YouTube for allowing certain conspiracy theory videos, but but not any involving Trump.
He questioned, “So YouTube is fine with “flat earth” videos, Russia conspiracy videos, and videos suggesting Michelle Obama is a man, but the company’s insiders can’t let anyone question the integrity of the 2020 election? #Section230.”
YouTube’s statement on the big seal also reassured people that the company will continue to be vigilant in its efforts to provide viewers with a balanced and calming concept of the material:.
“Our team is working hard to ensure that we strike a balance between allowing a wide range of political speech and ensuring that our platform is not abused to incite real-world harm or the widespread dissemination of harmful misinformation.”
In fact, this statement is so absurd that it reflects the “naked double standard” that has always been the hallmark of the Onza Nation, which is “I can, but you can’t. I repeat a thousand times a day when the rumor is in my favor, but when I encounter any piece of information that is not in my favor, I immediately block it completely ……
3
Texas threatens to declare independence?
Texas, as we all know, has been in a “semi-independent state”, it is a territory that the Americans seized by force from Mexico, in the process of seizure, the United States acquiesced to the declaration of “independence” of Texas, the establishment of a Republic of Texas (1836-1845) …
Before and during the brutal American Civil War
Texas maintained a high degree of independence
After that, although it nominally joined the Confederate States of America, it still flew its flag (the Lone Star) and had an independent army, claiming to be an independent entity. …… Now, this entity is pressuring the Supreme Court with a “referendum on independence”.
The Lone Star flag of Texas has been paired with his armed forces
It stands out in the United States
Although Texas is the territory of the establishment Republicans, the five factions of the Republican Party have become more united than ever in their fight against “democratic hegemony”. Because, if this year’s operation of the “multi-cat automatic ballot machine” continues, the Republican Party may become the party in opposition for a million years! The Democratic Party’s capital controls Silicon Valley technology companies, all the big media and social platforms, all the top U.S. schools and Wall Street …… its target for the traditional U.S. industry-based Republican capitalists, is basically a “downgrade”. The naked bullying will always continue.
Just a few days ago, the tough Texas Attorney General Paxton, filed a lawsuit to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the Supreme Court to rule that the election process in four Democrat-controlled swing states is unconstitutional, and that the election results in these states should be overruled by the Supreme Court! And now, 25 states across the nation (more than half now) have risen up in response to Texas’ call.
Today, Texas Republican Congressman Kyle Biederman came out with another statement in which he made an even bolder claim that is politically incorrect yet popular with conservatives. He says: If the shameless people conspire to get their way, future conservatives are the ones who will have to do it.
“The U.S. federal government is out of control and it does not represent the values of the people of Texas. That’s why I’m committed to introducing legislation this session that would allow a referendum to be held so that the people of Texas can vote for it and Texas can reaffirm its status as an independent state.”
“This legislation is fully consistent with Article I, Section 2 of the Texas Constitution, which states, “All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on the authority given by the people and are established for the benefit of the people.” The faith of the people of Texas promises to preserve a republican form of government, and so long as subject to this limitation, they shall at all times have the inalienable right to alter, reform, or abolish their government in such manner as they may deem expedient
.”
The feisty Texans have always loved carrying the Lone Star flag
By this point in the code, some of the melon crowd must be thinking, are the Texas state legislators crazy? However, not …… Yes, the population of Texas is only about 30 million, and many are illegal immigrants. Yet, it is such a state that it is the second richest state in the United States after California.
Texas has a GDP size of $1.73 trillion, and its economy could be in the top 10 in the world after independence, more than Canada. Texas has one of the world’s three major refining centers, with one-third of the nation’s oil production and one-fourth of the nation’s natural gas, and is also the most important chemical, aerospace, and light industrial base in the U.S. Leaving the U.S., Texas does not have much to lose, as people lean on the Gulf of Mexico, have access to the sea, and, also adjacent to several countries that share this Gulf… …
Texas is also one of the 50 states that has its own military. Texas has a military force that includes at least one integrated army division, two integrated army combat brigades, one air combat brigade, five fighter brigades, one air transport brigade, and seven independent regiments plus a large number of logistical support units, all under the control of the governor of Texas, which is why we call Texas a “semi-independent state”.
Texas troops displaying the Texas Lone Star flag
If Texas does declare independence, the other 20 or so Republican states (red states) will probably fall over themselves to support it! And then? Can the Democrats rely on California Hollywood stars and New York pedophile bigots to suppress it? This is a naked threat of civil war!
Garden commentary: familiar with the history of the United States should be clear, back in the day, is because of a Supreme Court decision and ultimately ignited the American Civil War. If the Supreme Court justices can “think about the big picture” and think less about their personal “position”, then there is hope that the United States can avoid a full-scale civil conflict. However, it is difficult for any mortal to predict what will happen in the future, isn’t it?
Recent Comments