President Donald Trump sent out several tweets on Wednesday (December 9) saying that everyone will soon understand the word “courage” and save America; he also questioned the fraudulent nature of the election because all the data after the vote leads to the same point, and he cannot lose unless the election is tampered with.
“No candidate has ever lost an election after winning both Florida and Ohio. I won both of their states, and by a lot!” In a tweet, Trump wrote.
No candidate has ever won both Florida and Ohio and lost.I won them both, by a lot!#SupremeCourt
- Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 9,2020
“We will soon understand the word ‘courage’ and save our country. I received hundreds of thousands more legal votes than my opponent in all the swing states. All the data after the vote shows that I cannot lose an election unless I am tampered with! If anyone cheats in an election, it’s my opponent,” Trump wrote.
We will soon be learning about the word “courage”, and saving our Country. ALL Data taken after the vote says that it was impossible to get my opponent to vote. for me to lose, unless FIXED!
- Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 9,2020
“If someone cheated in the election – and the Democrats did – why not immediately overturn the results? How can a country be run like this?” Kawakami questioned that.
If somebody cheated in the Election, which the Democrats did, why wouldn’t the Election be immediately overturned? can a Country be run like this?
- Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 9,2020
Trump went to Georgia with First Lady Melania on the 5th to campaign for the re-election of two Republican senators.
He cited a series of statistics on the scene: no incumbent president has ever been re-elected with an increase in votes and lost the election, Trump added 11 million votes in 2020 compared to 2016; 75% of the candidates who win the party’s primaries never lose, Trump won 94% of the party’s primary vote; no one has ever won Florida and Ohio and lost the general election, Trump took both states; 2020 Sen. The Republicans still maintain their majority in the election, and the House of Representatives has gained 13 seats instead of losing one. These numbers prove that it is impossible for Trump to lose the election, and that there is a statistical improbability.
In addition, most Republican politicians remain on the sidelines in the face of an increasing number of credible allegations of election fraud, and several Republicans in Name Only (RINOS) have emerged.
Trump has been urging Republicans to “toughen up” and has made ongoing efforts to raise public awareness of the testimony of election officials and scrutineers. These affidavits point to numerous election frauds, statistical anomalies, and potentially illegal practices.
Trump also named a number of so-called Republican governors and politicians. These officials, Trump said, have not done enough to investigate election fraud or are in the process of certifying fraudulent election results.
Trump’s Doubts U.S. Think Tank Scholars Find Credible
Patrick Basham, a former adjunct scholar and senior fellow at the Cato Institute, a U.S. think tank, writes an article that raises similar doubts as Trump’s. He finds that Florida, Ohio and Iowa, the three leading states (Windward states), are more heavily skewed than in 2016.
He found that Florida, Ohio, and Iowa, the three leading states (wind states), are polling more favorably for Trump than in 2016; Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, the Midwestern states, have been consistent with Ohio and Iowa, and Ohio, in turn, has generally trended in the same direction as Florida.
Florida’s Hispanic population is about 60 percent, and Trump’s 2020 vote among Hispanics increased by 40 to 67 percent. Biden, the Democratic candidate, is unlikely to win under these circumstances.
Basham questioned how Trump could lose Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin if he took Florida, Ohio, and Iowa.
Since 1852, only Republican presidential candidate Richard Nixon has lost the electoral vote after winning these three states, and it is still questionable how he lost to Democratic presidential candidate John F. Kennedy in 1960.
Basham also found that even when the polls are wrong, the non-polling indicators are error-free, keeping almost 100% of their records correct. And every non-polling indicator is predicting the re-election of Trump.
Non-polling indicators include: party registration trends; the candidates’ respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followers; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; donor counts, especially small donor counts; and the number of bets placed on each candidate.
If Trump loses this election, then for the first time ever, one or more of these non-popular indicators will be wrong, and all of them will be wrong at the same time. This is an extremely unlikely outcome.
Trump seems to have discovered this as well, sending out a tweet on Wednesday that read: “At 10:00 on election night, we have a 97% chance of winning in the ‘bookies’.”
Recent Comments