Trying to teach critical race theory behind parents’ backs Why U.S. schools are doing this – the deception is deplorable

Some schools force parents to sign waivers stating that they will not tap their children’s online courses or lie to parents with fake courses

Organizational psychologist Kellyn Borisenko says in a video with her hands clenched in a fist against the blow that schools instilling CRT has sparked anger among parents and between schools and parents, turning into an adversarial relationship. (Screenshot from the video)

More and more parents are becoming concerned about the spread of quasi-Marxist “critical race theory” in schools, while on the other hand, school officials are either in denial or silent, even lying to parents with fake curricula or asking them to sign ridiculous “waivers” that require parents to “stop eavesdropping. Parents are asked to “stop eavesdropping” on their children’s online classes.

So-called Critical Race Theory, or CRT for short, looks at everything through the lens of “race” and skin color. to create division and hatred.

Karlyn Borysenko, an American organizational psychologist, discussed this hot topic on her platform on May 3: “Schools tell teachers to send fake curriculum to parents who worry about indoctrination of their children” (see https://www.youtube.com) /watch?v=Q85QZ5lSrss), a 12-minute video that attracted nearly 1,500 likes, and more than 300 comments yesterday.

In the video, Borisenko commented on two news stories: “Tennessee parents forced to sign waivers stating they won’t wiretap their children’s online classes,” a Fox News report from last August, and the fact that Rutherford County schools are allowing parents to watch their children’s online classes with the consent of their teachers after a massive backlash from parents who resisted. Rutherford County schools allow parents to watch their children’s online classes together with the teacher’s permission, but parents cannot record them.

Why is that? What happens when parents break the rules? “Laurie Cardoza-Moore, founder of Proclaiming Justice to the Nations, told Fox News that it’s because teachers are promoting so-called “social justice” instead of teaching children to read, write and do math, and they don’t want to be accountable to parents.

In other news, the Daily Wire reported on April 28 that in the face of parental criticism of indoctrinating children with CRT, a Rockwood, Missouri, school district official instructed teachers to develop two sets of lessons: a fake one to deal with parents and a real one that focused on topics such as radicalism and privilege, a A memo obtained by The Daily Caller confirms this.

Natalie Fallert, a language coordinator for children’s literacy in the district, reportedly wrote to all middle and high school principals, saying that parents repeatedly complained that the schools were “promoting critical race theory, are making white kids feel bad about their privilege, are teaching kids to be social radicals,” and so on. And so on, because after the epidemic children were generally taking “online classes” and for the first time parents could see what teachers were teaching their children and see their children’s homework.

Originals for students and abridged versions for parents

In response, Falter wrote about his “solution” in a letter, saying, “It doesn’t mean you have to abandon your existing curriculum. You just pull the resources out of Canvas so that parents can’t see them… and you keep teaching! Just don’t show all the content on Canvas. That’s not cheating. You just keep doing what you’ve been doing for years. You also didn’t have students take everything home before the epidemic, and you didn’t offer it for students to take home. You just taught in the classroom and everything seemed fine. We are still the same old school…”

Falter goes on to write, “You can copy a lesson in Canvas (make 2 copies), post one as a condensed version, and that ‘original’ with all the content, just post it to specific students (if needed), or you email it specifically to certain students.”

“The mystery of what I mean by ‘making copies’ is that you can release a new version with less content. And that full version, you’re limited to (ONLY) showing it to kids…” Falter emphasized the “limited to” in big letters.

As a result, Shelley Willott, the district’s deputy superintendent, expressed “regret” to parents after the secret email came to light: “We want to assure you that the message was not reviewed or approved by anyone before it was sent. Having teachers hide anything from parents does not reflect the mission, vision and values of the Rockwood School District and is contrary to the goals set forth in our strategic plan, The Way Forward.”

School system in the hands of ‘affirmative action’ consultants

The Daily Wire reported that the district referred to parents as “allies” in the education of “our children.” In addition, a paper assigned to fifth-graders reads, “Michael Brown was murdered just steps from his mother’s home in Missouri. Officer Darren Wilson has not been charged with any misconduct. The new world order is to smash everything. It’s the way those who have been disempowered gain power.”

Despite the fact that the state’s governor is a Republican, the state’s school system has been thoroughly colonized by “affirmative action” consultants, the newspaper said. One firm, Educational Equity Consultants (EEC), has at least 30 clients statewide, including the state education office, and another school district client is planning to build on the “social justice” vision of “learning justice. “Another school district client is planning to revise its social studies curriculum based on the “social justice standards” envisioned by Learning Justice.

One of the many comments below Borisenko’s video included a viewer who said that her parents were appalled by the district’s teaching back in the 1980s and predicted that things would get worse, and that her parents have since taken her out of public school and home schooled her, and that she is now following their approach of home schooling her children. Some parents have also offered to sue schools that cheat parents.

Borisenko believes that to stop this, parents should become part of the school board, or at least need to become more active. Schools know that parents are paying close attention and will be wary. She also points out that many times parents call the school and ask, “Are they teaching CRT?” and the school often flatly denies that they “don’t know anything about CRT,” but then a week later you see in the documents the school requests that they are teaching CRT. They’re teaching CRT, they’re just using different words. In most cases, they are in fact teaching CRT.”