The FBI sent the day before the riot intelligence no one received the police community on the 4th to seek help from the armed Congress was rejected
The former U.S. Capitol Police chief accused the intelligence system of a breakdown in the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol. This is a pre-planned violence, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in January 5 has been intelligence, but the police were not informed of the information.
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Gary C. Peters (D-Mich.) said he also did not receive such important information.
The four witnesses were former Capitol Hill Police Chief Steven Sund, acting Metropolitan Police Chief Robert Cantee, former House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul D. Irving and former Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael C. Stenger, Voice of Hope compiled. Sander, Irving and Stenger have all resigned for their inadequate response to the Jan. 6 riots on Capitol Hill.
All four witnesses said they were on Capitol Hill when it was stormed on Jan. 6, and they found that some of the mob was prepared.
The FBI’s Norfolk office issued an alert on Jan. 5 about the impending clashes on Capitol Hill on Jan. 6, saying a mob would wage a “war” on Capitol Hill.
But Sander, Conti, Owen and Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael C. Stenger (D-Mich.) said they had not seen the FBI memo.
Sander disclosed that the House and Senate armed guardsmen (==) did not respond to their requests for assistance on Jan. 4. He had also requested assistance from the National Guard, which was also denied.
All four witnesses attributed their lack of success in containing the chaos on Capitol Hill on January 6 to the poor exchange of information between the services and the lack of follow-up support from the military.
New York State Fraudulent Purchase of Anti-Epidemic Supplies Implicates Chinese Suppliers
The New York State government under Cuomo’s rule rushed to place orders for anti-epidemic medical equipment during last year’s epidemic, omitting the usual contract review process, resulting in one-third of the $1.1 billion purchase contract to be recovered from the seller, which involved a Chinese supplier. The state recently hired a Hong Kong law firm to recover the money.
According to the New York Post 23 news, the New York State Department of health late last year with a “Gall Solicitors” (Gall Solicitors), a Hong Kong law firm signed a contract for a fee of $ 125,000, to engage its recovery of medical supplies contract default payments.
The one-year contract also provides for a waiver of the state comptroller’s “pre-audit” process. The reason is that the governor, who has had emergency powers since last year’s outbreak, can grant the other party an audit waiver. The governor’s emergency authority is now under pressure from state lawmakers to withdraw it because of his mishandling of the nursing Home matter.
The New York Times has reported that the Cuomo administration signed $1.1 billion in orders for respirators, masks and other anti-epidemic supplies with a variety of companies that would not have been qualified in normal times after last year’s outbreak; and that the contracts often used the usual irregularities of prepayment and other unfavorable ways of agreeing with the state. However, one-third of the contracts later resulted in New York State having to seek refunds because the sellers were late or could not deliver the goods.
These suppliers, in addition to Chinese manufacturer companies known for their poor quality, included unqualified U.S.-based companies such as car dealerships, military consulting firms, acquaintances of the state health department director, and even a sex toy manufacturer, all of which were not vetted suppliers during the epidemic emergency.
National Institutes of Health Funding Wuhan Virus Institute, 28 Lawmakers Call for Thorough Investigation
23, 28 Republican members of Congress sent a letter to Christi Grimm, Acting Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), calling for a “a prompt and thorough investigation.”
The lawmakers asked Greene to investigate the total amount of funding the Wuhan Institute of Virus received from the NIH and whether any NIH officials communicated with the institute or its U.S. sponsors at the Time of the outbreak to put to rest arguments that the Chinese Communist virus (COVID-19) may have been caused by a leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virus laboratory.
The 28 lawmakers accused NIH Director Francis Collins of “secretly funneling taxpayer funds to the Wuhan Institute for Virus Research” for its reckless coronavirus experiments, and the U.S. Department of Defense, through its funding of the EcoHealth Alliance, of allocating funds to the Wuhan Institute for Virus Research.
Prior to the outbreak, researchers at the Wuhan Virus Institute were working on a bat-based coronavirus, a project supported by $600,000 in U.S. taxpayer funds that flowed to the Wuhan Virus Institute through research grants distributed by NIH to the EcoHealth Alliance, a U.S. nonprofit organization.
“Unfortunately, NIH played a significant role in supporting the Wuhan Virus Institute and this dangerous research and propagating false narratives, and NIH is dismissive of the potential role of its funded Wuhan Virus Institute laboratories in the COVID-19 pandemic.” The letter said.
But White House press secretary Jen Psaki, in a Feb. 23 press briefing, denied that the Wuhan Institute of Virus labs had donations from the United States.
Without warning, the Fed’s payment system was completely down for a time
On Thursday, Feb. 24, the wire transfer system of the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank (FED) was completely down for a time, with the system disrupted for several hours, making it impossible for major banks and other financial institutions to transfer funds.
The central bank said in a statement that it became aware of the problem at about 11:15 a.m. ET. A person who works at a Wall Street bank said the Fedwire and ACH systems appear to have come back online around 2:45 p.m. ET, with several hours of downtime in between.
The outage could have widespread effects, CNBC reported. The system also handles direct deposit of paychecks, Social Security payments, income tax refunds and automatic payments for mortgages and utilities.
UFO flies over U.S. airliner, pilot’s aerial conversation revealed
At approximately 1 p.m. Central Time on Feb. 21, U.S. Flight 2292 had an unscheduled encounter with an unidentified flying object (UFO) over northeastern New Mexico. The pilot was asking the console over the radio, “Do you have any targets here? We just happen to have something flying over our heads.”
The pilot said excitedly, “I hate to say this, but (I have to admit) it looked like a long cylindrical object that looked almost like a cruise missile and was moving very fast. It went right over us.”
The radio recording was made public by Steve Douglass on his blog, Deep Black Horizon.
Douglass said Flight 2292 was flying at an altitude of about 37,000 feet in New Mexico when the UFO was sighted. The Albuquerque Center did not respond to the pilot, and the plane continued on its way and landed in Phoenix, Ariz.
New Mexico is the location of the White Sands Missile Range (White Sands Missile Range), known as the Department of Defense’s “largest, fully equipped open-air range. Douglas analyzed that the 21st was a Sunday, the military was on break, and the military did not give notice of the military test firing.
He said that if the military were to test-fire a missile, it would contact the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in advance to prohibit aircraft from entering the test-fire area, so the possibility of an aircraft accidentally entering the missile test-fire area is not high.
American Airlines has confirmed to Fox News that the radio recording made public by Douglas was indeed from Flight 2292. But the company did not comment further on the “UFO incident”.
China-India clash, pouncing on the head of the People’s Liberation Army Indian Chinese face was recognized, but from…
Chinese faces were seen in some of the footage of the battle between India and China in the Garavan Valley, and after investigation, they were found to be from the Indo-Tibetan Special Border Force, a group of Tibetan separatists.
New Headquarter reports that Chinese police arrested a netizen, “Hot Pen Little Ball,” on the 19th, claiming that his Sina and Weibo posts maliciously distorted the truth and denigrated the five heroic border guards, thus causing a bad social impact. After the police tracked down the suspect, he was criminally detained on suspicion of provocation and nuisance.
Then, the Chinese Communist Party officially released part of the film of the Battle of the Garhwan Valley, in which an Indian soldier who pounced on the communist army’s Qifa Bao leader looked like a Chinese-American face. So netizens wondered, “Could it be that this is a Chinese mercenary in the Indian army?”
This check only found that this is the Indian army Naga captain Manningba. This is an Indian paramilitary unit: India-Tibet Special Frontier Force (English name Special Frontier Force, or SSF). Created on November 14, 1962, the SSF was originally formed by former Tibetan resistance forces and refugees in exile in India, with the primary objective of conducting covert operations in the People’s Republic of China in the event of renewed war between India and China. There are currently over a thousand Tibetans serving in the Indian Special Forces, many of whom are serving in this unit. This unit is under the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs, but they are directly under the responsibility of the Research and Analysis Wing of the Indian Cabinet Secretariat, one of India’s secret intelligence agencies.
Some of the films of the Sino-Indian Battle of the Garhwan Valley, in which Chinese faces were seen, were investigated and found to be the Indo-Tibetan Special Border Force, formed by Tibetan separatists.
Recent Comments