Chinese media have revealed that Chinese soldiers in the Xizang Military area Command on the mainland have been equipped with a new combat system and that commanders have the power to “self-destruct” their soldiers by remote control. Taiwan‘s military experts say reports by Chinese media may have serious adverse effects. According to the data. (Photo credit: Weibo screenshot)
Soldiers of the Communist Party of China (CPC) armed forces in the Tibetan Military area Command on the Chinese mainland have been fitted with a new combat system with a self-destruct device, and commanders have the right to remotely activate the device to “self-destruct” the soldiers, Chinese media reported recently. The mainland media’s self-disclosure sparked discussion, with foreign media commenting on its motives as “inexplicable”. Li Zhengxiu, a Taiwanese military expert, said the Chinese media reports could backfire badly.
Chinese media boast that the Communist army is equipped with a self-destruct device
Network media in the “observer” reported recently, mainland Tibetan military region of the communist party of China army soldiers were equipped with “new individual digital combat system”, set navigator, audio converter with consulting processing and other functions in one, the soldiers set satellite antenna, helmet and equipped with monocular night-vision multi-function eyepiece, the arm and digital terminal. Battalion commanders in command centres can also direct individual soldiers. The system can direct the shelling with one click and self-destruct if it is picked up by Indian troops, with all the soldiers’ personal information on the command screen.
If a soldier is seriously wounded but does not want to be taken prisoner, activating the self-destruct device not only protects the soldier’s dignity, but also prevents the enemy from obtaining any information about the system, the report said. “Most notably,” the report boasted, “remote self-destruction will also be initiated if commanders detect on the screen that an individual soldier has distanced himself from other units, but cannot make contact.”
The news was forwarded by many Chinese media, causing such a stir that the description of the self-destruct device has now disappeared from the observer’s original report.
Against this by rendering system for high-tech, the Internet, many people criticize the communist party of China (” life like dirt “, “take people as cannon fodder”, “poor people have fantasies on the Chinese communist party”, “very normal, the Chinese people and worthless, said Chinese chives, anyway, to cut a few years later, he will have the next group”, “Chinese discrimination against indians, called ‘red head three o, only deserve to be on and preservation, so are they captured is a crying shame, have to be killed.” .
Taiwan expert acid: the opposite effect
Li Zhengxiu in an interview with radio free Asia, stressed that such equipment is not unique to the Chinese communist troops: “many countries including the United States, they are carried by soldiers of high-tech equipment, basically have such (self-destructive) function, once the soldiers fall into the hand of the enemy, can launch such a function, destroy the storage of confidential information of the equipment, but this does not include to hurt, so let people feel the report, surrender is shameful, officer shall have the right to the soldiers on the far side of sanctions.”
Li Zhengxiu also said: “in the mainland to the survival of the website, especially about very highly sensitive political and military sites, if not the acquiescence of the communist party of China is impossible, so from observer network first report cited again, such an approach, possibly they originally wanted to boast of equipment advanced degree, but reporters to write, let a person feel the original military even no surrender, whether misunderstanding or deliberately mislead.”
While some critics have questioned whether the report is part of the Communist Party’s “internal propaganda”, Mr Li criticised: “Many people who join the military in mainland China really do so because of family economic circumstances. Most of those who joined the army were from rural or lower-middle class families, and at the very least they wanted to be safe and secure. If these people are deterred by such reports, isn’t that counterproductive?”
Recent Comments