Just last week, the Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed with President Trump‘s position on “indefinite effect,” and the Wisconsin Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Mark Jefferson and the Wisconsin Republican Party. But the court noted that, as President Trump sought in a separate lawsuit, the decision must be made on a case-by-case basis before those votes can be thrown out.
Under Wisconsin law, voters who conclude, in their own judgment, that they are in indefinite “restricted status” due to factors such as age, physical illness or infirmity may receive a ballot by mail, bypassing Wisconsin’s voter ID law. This fall, about 215,000 Wisconsin voters said they were in indefinite restricted status, nearly four times more than in the 2016 election. The court found that the government’s interpretation of Wisconsin’s indefinite restricted status was wrong. The court said, “County staff, could not have “declared” that voters were in indefinite restricted status due to the outbreak. “The court further stated: “…… While the presence of a contagious disease such as Wuhan pneumonia does not entitle all Wisconsin voters, to use absentee ballots ……. “
Wisconsin has 240,000 cases of indefinite restriction this year, most of which are illegal, and these are undoubtedly Biden’s votes. A judge has agreed that these votes are illegal, then Republicans should eliminate every such ballot until Democrats can prove that every one of these ballots is legal.
Since more than 200,000 Biden votes were marked as illegal, will the current Wisconsin leadership, change the Electoral College votes to award them to President Trump? Or must President Trump still fight for justice in Wisconsin alone?
Recent Comments