On November 22, New Jersey voters protested against election fraud.
By analyzing New Jersey’s database, I found that New Jersey’s fraud problem may be more serious than Pennsylvania’s, but it has been out of the public eye because it is not a swing state. Since New Jersey automatically mails ballots to all registered voters, the voter list is extra important.
First, the author would like to touch a little on the genesis of reading the New Jersey database.
While analyzing the Pennsylvania data set, I came across a suspicious set of voters who lived in Pennsylvania and used out-of-state phone numbers. The author then enlisted the help of a fraud investigator from Epoch Times to conduct a random phone call to verify the information.
A Mr. Thomas, who lives in Adams County, told us that he had lived temporarily in a neighboring state, New Jersey, and then returned to his home state of Pennsylvania. This time when he went to vote, Pennsylvania would not let him vote, saying he was registered as a voter in New Jersey and was a Democrat. He was furious and said he had never registered in New Jersey, he was registered to vote in Pennsylvania. He said he had been a Republican all his life, so how could he be registered as a Democrat? He began to fight, spending more than two hours on the phone to New Jersey, adamantly demanding that his fake registration be cancelled, and he was eventually able to vote in Pennsylvania.
Mr. Thomas said he was willing to testify publicly about his voting experience, and specifically asked a reporter to help investigate whether he himself had actually been deregistered in New Jersey?
The author found Mr. Thomas’ information in the New Jersey database and he was used for false registration in April 2019 and has indeed been cancelled now.
From there the author asked the New Jersey government for data to use for analysis, and was given the December 16 New Jersey dataset, and did a comparison for voters in both Pennsylvania and New Jersey, starting with phone numbers. We tried to find cases similar to Mr. Thomas’, and successfully found 18 cases. They voted in both states with the same name, birthday and phone number. The author believes that it is entirely possible that even they are unaware that their information has been repeatedly stolen and used to register to vote across state lines. With sensitive information withheld, see the following chart for details.
There are at least 18 voters who voted in both Pennsylvania and New Jersey. (Data source: New Jersey database)
Here begins the formal analysis: The New Jersey voter data consists of three tables: voter registration, voter voting history, and current mail-in ballot records. The analysis reveals that there are common problems in the New Jersey data that have been found in other swing states, as detailed below.
I. Analysis of Voter Registration Data
Doubtful: Half of the state’s counties have more active voters than the adult citizen population
The population of New Jersey in 2020 is 8,936,570, the percentage of adults is 78.2% and the percentage of citizens is 90.6%, so the adult citizens are about 6.3 million (6,331,488).
There are 6,505,323 records in the voter registration form, and 6,068,623 of them are active voters. That is 95.8% of adult citizens. Given that New Jersey requires citizens to register themselves as voters, this rate is clearly higher.
The author then breaks down the population and active voters to look at the county level: in half of the only 21 counties in New Jersey, there are more active voters than the county’s adult citizen population.
In half of the 21 counties in New Jersey alone, active voters are larger than the county’s adult citizen population. (Data source: New Jersey database)
Doubt No. 2: 18,414 phantom successful voters statewide, oldest 1709 years old
The oldest person to live in the United States is Hester Ford, born in 1904, now 116 years old. Among active voters, there are 38,284 seniors older than Hester, of whom 18,414 have successfully voted. The chart below lists the oldest dozens who have voted this time. The oldest voter recorded was born in 0311, which is 1709 years old this year. The gender is not disclosed.
The chart below shows the oldest dozens of New Jersey voters who cast a ballot this time. (Data source: New Jersey database)
Statewide, 12,672 voters had a voter registration date before they were 17 years old, and even more incredibly 7,800 were registered to vote before they were born.
Some of the New Jersey citizens who were registered to vote before they were born. (Data source: New Jersey database)
Since New Jersey automatically mails ballots to all registered voters, the voter list is particularly important.
II. Analysis of Election History Data Set
Doubtful: 567,000 votes in the official website are suspected to be false
New Jersey’s official website announced the number of votes cast this time: 4,549,353. The election history data contains records of voters’ voting dates and addresses since 2007, as in other states, and does not contain specific content, and the calculated number of votes cast is: 4,208,495.
Upon further inspection, it was found that there were duplicate ballots among these votes. After filtering out the duplicate ballots, it was found that the actual total number of votes was only 3,981,728, a difference of more than 226,000 votes (226,767 = 4,208,495 – 3,981,728). In other words, there are more than 226,000 ballots in the database that were recorded twice.
Finally, the author subtracted the official number (4,549,353 votes) from the actual total number of votes in the database (3,981,728 votes), which equals to 567,625 votes. So the real number of voters should be more than 567,000 less than the official one announced.
III. Vote by mail form data
There were 6,044,978 ballots in the mail-in ballot form, of which 6,020,278 ballots were mailed.
As mentioned above, New Jersey automatically mailed ballots to all active voters, and there were 6,068,623 active voters, so the three numbers match up (only 0.8% less, so there may be some address problems).
There were 4,245,048 returned ballots, about 70% of those mailed (70.5%).
The records of mailed ballots include the date they were mailed, the date they were returned, and the date they were counted. The first two are easy to understand, and the count date should be the day the ballots are scanned and counted in the database.
What does not make sense is that
- 2,308 ballots were mailed and collected the next day.
Some ballots were collected the next day after they were mailed. (Data source: New Jersey database)
- 2,409 ballots were collected the same day they were mailed.
Some ballots were collected the same day they were mailed. (Source: New Jersey database)
- 1,026 ballots were collected before they were mailed.
Some ballots were collected before they were mailed. (Source: New Jersey database)
- The data also shows that more than 30,000 ballots (30,708) were counted first and then collected.
Some ballots were counted first and then retrieved. (Data source: New Jersey database)
This appears to be an attempt to change all mail-in ballots received after Election Day to ballots received on Election Day. So the author broke down these mail-in ballots a bit more and found that indeed, all such ballots were counted on General Election Day (Nov. 3). Three counties (Middlesex, Ocean, Somerset) have made this change, changing all ballots received from the 4th to the 18th to be counted on the 3rd.
Three counties (Middlesex, Ocean, Somerset) have made this change, changing all ballots received from the 4th to the 18th to be counted on the 3rd day. (Data source: New Jersey database)
Finally, there is the day of the ballot count. The latest date to certify ballots in New Jersey should be December 8, but the author found that there are still ballots counted on December 11. That’s three days later than Dec. 8, and it’s more than 347,000. (Note: The following table omits the days when the number of votes counted was less than one thousand per day.
A significant number of ballots were still counted after Dec. 8. (Data source: New Jersey database)
After doing an analysis of the New Jersey data set, it may be understandable why New Jersey joined the high court case against Texas v. Four Swing States for Fraud the other day – New Jersey’s own fraud problem is probably worse than theirs.
The author believes that New Jersey’s government should conduct a rigorous audit of its registered voter rolls and allow each party to audit them independently on a regular basis.
Recent Comments