Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI), chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, tweeted a series of tweets on Dec. 21 to summarize the Senate’s Dec. 16 hearings on U.S. 2020 election fraud. He said many of the issues raised in the Senate Committee on Election Fraud are very important and the Senate needs to investigate them in order to address them.
Johnson said the committee’s findings at the Senate’s 2020 election fraud hearings included: the U.S. courts did not hear evidence of fraud in the 2020 election from Republicans; the U.S. Department of Homeland Security talked about “2020 election security” in terms of cybersecurity and did not mention fraud; and the U.S. Democratic Party tried to avoid the issue of fraud in the 2020 election by blaming all Republicans who raised the issue, but the issue is of concern to millions of American voters.
Senator Johnson tweeted a video of the hearing, saying that Senator Rick Paul, who was present, pointed out that after the 2020 election, the American people filed a large number of lawsuits regarding election fraud, but more than 60 lawsuits were dismissed by the courts, leading the American people to believe that there was no election fraud in 2020.
Senator Paul therefore got Kenneth Winston Starr, the 39th Attorney General of the U.S. Department of Justice, to admit in a hearing that the U.S. courts refused to hear the Trump camp’s election fraud lawsuit for technical or procedural reasons, not legal ones. He also led Starr to concede that Pennsylvania and several U.S. states were blatantly unconstitutional in 2020 because their secretaries of state changed their states’ election laws.
My hearing examining irregularities in the 2020 election was important.
Many issues and questions were raised that deserve investigation and answers:
1) @RandPaul and Judge Starr talked about how courts really didn’t evaluate evidence of fraud at all pic.twitter.com/ GogMphIFCg
- Senator Ron Johnson (@SenRonJohnson) December 21, 2020
Trump senior legal adviser Ellis: opposes use of the Counterinsurgency Act Chinese netizens are lopsided in their opposition
In a December 21 interview with JustTheNews, Trump campaign senior counsel Jenna Ellis said she opposes the use of the Anti-Insurgency Act, saying Americans do not want it. Ellis said, “Our solution can’t be to destroy the Constitution.”
Ellis advised President Trump not to use the Counterinsurgency Act to address controversies that arise in the 2020 election. “There’s a reason we have a constitutional process, and we do need the judicial branch to step in.” Ellis stressed that the Counterinsurgency Act is used under specific conditions. She said lawmakers back then had installed guardrails for the use of the “military option.
Ellis said, “State legislatures, they can investigate all of this corruption, they can investigate how the laws of the state in question are being completely ignored, and they can withdraw their electorate representatives at any time.” “And they can also refuse to accept false and fraudulent certification. That’s the constitutional solution.”
“We have to go through this process, and we have to hold our leaders accountable,” she said. “Ultimately, if the wrongs are not righted, we must continue to fight to make sure it doesn’t happen again.”
But Chinese netizens lopsidedly disagreed with her, “Activating the counterinsurgency law at a time of such a massive insurgency is precisely upholding the Constitution; how can it be undermining it? Ellis’ level of law is too questionable!”
“It’s clear that the “guardrails” are now the traitors around Trump.” “What is the so-called guardrail? If you don’t say it, it shows that it’s a snub. Wherever there is a crowd, there is a left center right.” “Ultimately, how much will it cost the American people if the wrongs are not righted? Why is this bitch talking so easily?”
Recent Comments