There is no way to guess the process, but the way the great and wise Trump won will be convincing.
With the U.S. Supreme Court dismissing the Texas lawsuit and the U.S. Electoral College meeting to vote for Biden, there seemed to be little that President Trump (Trump) could do to turn the tide other than to arm himself to quell the “treasonous election” (a slogan put out by the masses of people who support Trump). However, late in the evening of December 19, President Trump sent out a message stating clearly that the much publicized news that he would impose martial law was fake news. So it’s all over for the 2020 U.S. presidential election, is it?
It’s not that simple. Biden will face “a nightmare”, while Trump, more likely to usher in the ultimate victory.
Trump issued an article refuting fake news and announced that he will help elect the Senate race in Joe
Late Saturday night (Dec. 19), after widespread reports that he had called a meeting at the White House to discuss the use of the military to address election fraud, President Trump tweeted that the information was untrue.
He said, “Martial law = fake news. Learn more about false reporting now!
Shortly before that, Trump announced that he would be traveling to Georgia again on January 4 to hold a large campaign rally for two Republican incumbent senators running in the Senate final election. A day later, on January 5, is the day of voting and opening of ballots for the special Senate election.
In a tweet, Trump again slammed Georgia’s Republican governor and secretary of state for allegedly covering up election fraud in the presidential election, but he expressed no concern about the outcome of his own election, instead expressing confidence in the state’s Senate race as a sure win.
Loeffler and Perdue, like us, were treated very badly by the ‘Republican’ governor and ‘Republican’ secretary of state in Georgia,” he said. “On Jan. 5, we have to have a huge victory for two great people.
“On January 4, Monday night, I’m going to have a big rally for them.
“Win!
Perdue states he will challenge Electoral College vote if he wins
Shortly after Trump issued his rebuttal of the fake news, he retweeted a scoop: incumbent Republican Sen. David Perdue, who is running for a Senate seat in Georgia, said he would challenge the electoral college vote if he wins. Perdue said he would challenge the Electoral College vote if he wins.
Trump again praised Perdue as a great man and praised him as a patriot.
This led to Trump’s campaign trip to Georgia on Jan. 4; the Senate special election vote and opening of the polls on Jan. 5; and a joint session of Congress to confirm the Electoral College vote on Jan. 6.
The dense and intertwined timeline will once again focus people’s attention on the confirmation of electoral votes.
Challenging the Electoral College will become a reality
After each state’s electoral votes are cast, their ballots must be accepted by Congress to be valid.
By law, the House and Senate will meet on Jan. 6, and if any state’s ballot is challenged (challenged) by one member of the House and one member of the Senate, the upper and lower houses must meet separately and vote on the challenge.
This comes after Rep. Brooks of Alabama took the lead in proposing a vote that would challenge the Electoral College. Since then, 126 members of Congress have signed on to the Texas lawsuit to overturn Joe Biden’s victory. Biden’s victory, so more House members have stated they will join Brooks.
Perdue’s statement is clear news when it comes to the linked Senate picks that trigger a debate vote on electoral votes. In fact, many Republican senators do not accept Biden for president, and Perdue is not the only senator who will challenge, according to The Hill.
The New York Times and others have only one theory of invalidating an Electoral College challenge
The new Congress will be sworn in on Jan. 3, but its leader will still be the current vice president, Mike Pence. Pence.
The new House, where Democrats hold a narrow majority, will reject any challenge. But what about the Senate? Something very different could happen.
Let’s say Republicans hold a 52-48 majority. But Republican Senators Mitt Romney, Ben McDonnell, and John Kerry would be the only ones to win. Romney, Ben Sasse, Susan B. Sullivan, and John Kerry. Sasse, Susan B. Collins and Lisa B. Collins. The Republican Senators Mitt Romney, Ben Sasse, Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski had endorsed Biden’s victory. Murkowski had endorsed Biden’s victory, so Biden would have won in a very close vote.
Even if the Senate votes for the challenge, there is a deadlock-breaking provision: If the House and Senate are not in agreement, the vote of any elector certified by their governors will be accepted. Then, Biden would still win.
Thus, the New York Times determined that the Republican challenge to the Electoral College vote was futile.
I don’t know if the second Electoral Count Act will bring the presidential election to a rare “snap election” where Trump wins
Jeremy D. Meyer, a Biden supporter Jeremy D. Mayer is a professor at George Mason University. Jeremy D. Mayer, an associate professor at George Mason University’s Schar School of Policy and Government, recently wrote a detailed article in The Hill explaining the electoral crisis Biden faces after challenging the electoral vote.
The controlling federal law, the Election Count Act (ECA), is more than 100 years old, but has been invisible because it has never been fully used.
The scenario presented in New Times is one in which the Senate debates the vote to give the results. But what if the Senate had never concluded a vote (and could not give an outcome)?
The ECA limits each challenge to no more than two hours of debate time. Four states (Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania) were challenged in the lawsuit, so four challenges and an eight-hour delay were given. Is it true that even in the Senate, 8 hours of debate can’t last more than a few days?
Not really. The ECA provides for challenges to the ballot as a whole or individually.
A legally-minded challenger would challenge each elector’s ballot separately, not each state’s electoral votes as a whole. A pro-Trump legislator could even challenge the electoral votes of Biden’s blue states, for example, or even Delaware.
The purpose of a challenge is not to win, but to delay, to prevent a situation such as the one analyzed by the New York Times.
Remember, the man leading the ECA is Mike Pence. Pence. He could conceivably interpret the rules in a way that would be very favorable to Republicans. He could help Republicans delay any resolution until around January 18.
Then the election would go to a “snap election” to deal with the wreckage. The Constitution provides that if there is no winner of the Electoral College, then the Senate will elect the vice president and the House will elect the president.
In the Senate, Republicans generally approve of Pence, so Pence will be re-elected vice president.
In the “snap election,” instead of members of the House of Representatives voting to elect the president, the new House of Representatives will elect the president based on a total of 50 votes from the 50 state delegations, with one vote from each state delegation. (For more details, please read: 2020 U.S. Election Possible Results 200 Years Ago Trump Will Win Big)
In the new Congress, the Republican dominant state delegation, with a 27-22 lead. Voting under this circumstance, Trump will undoubtedly win.
The deeper meaning in Trump’s words
On Dec. 11, when the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the Texas lawsuit, President Trump tweeted that “the battle has just begun.
On Dec. 14, when the Electoral College met to vote for Biden, but at the same time seven states’ replacement electors flipped the Electoral College vote for Trump and sent it to Congress, Trump criticized some wavering Republican executives for “giving up the fight too soon.
Indeed, Trump has not announced his withdrawal from the race and has been fighting a battle against election fraud, with his campaign’s legal action continuing.
As of Jan. 20, there are too many possibilities.
But as Jeremy Meyer warned Biden. But as Jeremy Meyer warned Biden, “No, Biden hasn’t won – it’s another nightmare.
Recent Comments