U.S. Constitutional Studies Author Explains the Insurrection Act: It’s all about enforcing the law. Enforcing the Constitution.
The New York Times, renamed the Kurokawa Times by noted scholar He Qinglian, reported Friday that the White House discussed imposing martial law and appointing Powell to investigate attempted election fraud.
President Trump dismissed the New York Times saying it was fake news, and Apollo.com chief commentator Wang Duyan analyzes the New York Times story.
Wang Duyan is the pseudonym used by our editor-in-chief, Wang Duyruo, for her commentary. Ms. Wang gave up her high-paying job in Silicon Valley in 2006 to break the news embargo and set up Apollo.com news website. Since then, it has been 15 years as 1 day, never taking 1 day off.
Wang Dukran analyzed this whole report of New York Times, and it is worth noting that New Times just doesn’t recognize Trump as the president of the United States right now, and it is Mr. Trump throughout, except for the first sentence at the beginning of the article.
Wang Dukran introduced the New Times fake news story that Powell was under siege by Mr. Trump’s advisers and that Mr. Trump shocked presidential circles with the idea of having Powell investigate election fraud. But Wang Dukran pointed out why New Times Fake News slapped itself in the face in the same fake news article. Wang Dukran found that the author was the award-winning author of Kurokawa’s Russia-gate story.
Author of Constitutional Studies Explains the Sedition Act: It’s All About Enforcement
Despite overwhelming evidence of massive fraud, the charges have been repeatedly dismissed by the courts. Some have therefore called on Trump, the president to use the Insurrection Act of 1807 to resolve the matter.
The Act allows the president to send troops to suppress a rebellion if it makes it “impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States by the ordinary course of justice.
Paul Engel, author of the Constitution Study, explains more about the act. He told NTD that the Insurrection Act is meant to enforce the law, not replace it.
But in the case of this election, Engel said, it would be a violation of his state’s constitution for states to make moves such as changing voting laws or encouraging illegal voting before the election.
We’re dealing with a lot of unrest,” he said. But I don’t know of any state that has done anything to make it impractical to enforce the laws of the United States. (that) they’re not enforcing their own laws. But the Insurrection Act is to enforce the laws of the United States, not the laws of individual states.”
Stephen B. Meister, a leading New York attorney, wrote an article for the English-language Epoch Times titled “Trump Can Invoke Insurrection Law to Restore Election Integrity.” He argues that, given the 2020 election and the historical context, Trump could and should invoke the Sedition Act.
New York Times: White House discusses implementing martial law, appointing Powell to investigate election fraud refuted
The White House met recently to discuss options such as martial law and control of voting machines, and Trump is also considering appointing barrister Sidney Powell as special counsel to investigate election fraud.
The New York Times quoted sources as saying Friday (19) that Trump discussed appointing Powell as special counsel to oversee the investigation of election fraud at a meeting that day. Trump preferred to appoint her as special counsel at the Justice Department, but the discussion at the meeting advocated for her to serve as White House special counsel. Powell has recently received a threatening letter from the multi-cat Dominion Corporation.
Attendees at the meeting included Powell lawyers, General Flynn (Michael Flynn) and senior White House administration officials, with Trump’s personal lawyer Giuliani (Rudy Giuliani) also participating in the discussion via telephone.
General Flynn recently urged Trump on Newsmax television to impose martial law and deploy the military to oversee swing states from new elections. At Friday’s meeting, Trump also inquired about the idea.
Also discussed at the meeting was the implementation of an executive order to control and inspect voting machines. Giuliani urged the Department of Homeland Security to take control of voting machines to expose election fraud. He has discussed the matter with top DHS officials in the past week.
Apollo.com commentator Wang Dukran said the New York Times, known as the Kurokawa Times, said the meeting was fired up, but another left media outlet said Giuliani personally attended the meeting, which is not consistent with the NYT’s account. But the meeting clearly existed and it was good to discuss the implementation of martial law, which means that Trump is not opposed to moving to implement limited martial law in several swing states so that new elections can be held in those states from.
President Trump refutes New Times fake news, Wang Dukran analyzes New Times report
Trump tweeted at 11 p.m. Saturday that “martial law = fake news, just another deliberate misstatement.”
Commentator Wang Dukran said that the New York Times, known as the Kurokawa Times, said that the meeting was fired up, but another left media said that Giuliani personally participated in the meeting, which is inconsistent with the New York Times’ claim. Although the New York Times report only mentions that Giuliani initially participated by telephone link, but such an important meeting, it is unlikely to be an impromptu arrangement, it is unlikely that Giuliani initially participated by telephone link, and then ran to the meeting in person. What is the point of running there in person afterwards, since you can use the phone title?
Wang Dukran observed that the New York Times report also said that some senior administration officials drifted in and out of the meeting. (Some senior administration officials drifted in and out of the meeting.) Wang said that it was impossible for some senior administration officials to go in and out of such an important meeting, and that it was impossible even for ordinary meetings in American companies to go in and out.
Wang found that the New York Times report also said that Ms. Powell’s (conspiracy theory idea about multi-cat voting machine fraud) was defeated by all of her Trump advisors present, all of whom repeatedly pointed out that she had yet to prove her claims. The person who briefed the meeting at one point said that she had produced several affidavits, but upon inspection, they were all signed by a man whose testimony she had previously served as an expert witness, and her testimony was called into question.
(Ms. Powell’s ideas were shot down by every other Trump adviser present, all of whom repeatedly pointed out that she At one point, one person briefed on the meeting said, she produced several affidavits, At one point, one person briefed on the meeting said, she produced several affidavits, but upon inspection they were all signed by a man she has previously used as an expert witness, whose credentials have been called into question. into question.)
Wang Dukran said that Trump’s advisers, or at least Navarro, had made a 36-page report on election fraud, so how could all of Trump’s advisers have objected to the evidence raised by Barrister Powell? We’ve all seen plenty of sworn testimony from experts on multi-cat cheating, evidence, demo coverage videos and audit reports.
The New York Times reported that sources with knowledge of the meeting said Powell had produced some expert testimony but it was found to be all signed by one person and therefore not credited. Wang Dukran said that this is not consistent with the facts, and that we have seen a large number of expert testimonies, at least several dozen people.
New York Times Fake News: Powell Under Siege by Mr. Trump’s Advisers
Apollo.com chief commentator Wang Dukran continues his analysis of the entire New York Times story for you. The New York Times report also says that White House counsel Pat A. Cipollone and White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows have repeatedly and vehemently attacked the ideas put forward by Powell. Mr. Cipollone told Mr. Trump that what was discussed had no constitutional mandate. The White House and other advisers to the Trump campaign conveyed the same message throughout the meeting, which went on for a long time.
(Original text: The White House counsel, Pat A. Cipollone, and the White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, repeatedly and aggressively The White House counsel, Pat A. Cipollone, and the White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, repeatedly and aggressively pushed back on the ideas being proposed, which went beyond the special counsel idea, those briefed on the meeting said.
Mr. Cipollone told Mr. Trump there was no constitutional authority for what was being discussed, one of the people briefed on the meeting said. Other advisers from the White House and the Trump campaign delivered the same message throughout the meeting, which other advisers from the White House and the Trump campaign delivered the same message throughout the meeting, which stretched on for a long period of time.
The New York Times now disavows Trump as president and uses Mr. Trump inside the story, Wang said. It said that the practices discussed at the meeting were unconstitutional, so Trump’s advisers had to tell Mr. Trump repeatedly and at length that none of the practices he was considering would work.
Wang concluded that the New York Times article was a propaganda piece just like the Chinese Communist Party’s fake news.
Wang describes the NYT’s report here and then emphasizes. Mr. Trump was defeated by President-elect Biden with more than 7 million votes. The states have confirmed Mr. Biden’s victory by a 306-232 margin. (corrected)
(Mr. Trump was defeated in the election by President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. by more than 7 million votes. The states have confirmed Mr. Biden’s Electoral College victory by a margin of 306-232.)
New Times Fake News: Trump’s idea of having Powell investigated shocks presidential circle
Commentator Wang Dukran observes that the NYT report has nothing on the background of Powell’s lawyer, except that she is a Trump team lawyer and a conspiracy theorist in the multi-cat manipulation of the Venezuelan election and the US election, but has been debunked. And the word lawyer is used only 1 time.
Wang Dukran introduced the New York Times article right down to say that Mr. Trump is the one who, at the instigation of Powell and other supporters, did not admit defeat and nestled in the White House insisting that he did win the election. This is despite the fact that Powell and others who claimed election fraud were baseless and were thoroughly debunked. And Trump’s closest allies are saying the notion that the country conspired to rig the election is absurd.
(Original post: But Mr. Trump, egged on by supporters like Ms. Powell, has never conceded and, holed up inside the White House, he continues But Mr. Trump, egged on by supporters like Ms. Powell, has never conceded and, holed up inside the White House, he continues to assert that he actually won- even though the baseless claims Ms. Powell and others have made of widespread fraud He continues to assert that he actually won- even though the baseless claims Ms. Powell and others have made of widespread fraud have been thoroughly debunked and even many of Mr. Trump’s closest allies have dismissed as preposterous her tale of an international conspiracy to rig the (an international conspiracy to rig the vote.)
All of us know that this description by the New York Times is not factual, in fact it is fake news, said Wang Dukran. The closest allies, 1 name and no source, this kind of news writing becomes randomly made up.
The New York Times goes on below to say that the idea of Trump having Powell investigated shocked presidential circles. Several of Powell’s cases in court were thrown out by the courts.
But the idea that Mr. Trump would try to install Ms. Powell in a position to investigate the outcome sent shock waves through the She has repeatedly claimed there was widespread fraud, but several lawsuits she filed related to election fraud have been tossed out. She has repeatedly claimed there was widespread fraud, but several lawsuits she filed related to election fraud have been tossed out of court.
The New York Times is trying to portray Barrister Powell as a lunatic, and then lead readers to believe that Crazy Powell is leading Crazy Trump to conspire to violate the Constitution, which has been opposed by Trump’s advisers.
New York Times Fake News Slaps Itself in the Face by Award-Winning Author of Kurokawa’s Russia-gate
Wang Dukran said that the second half of the New York Times story was to say mainly that Giuliani wanted the Department of Homeland Security to seize the multi-cat voting machines, but the Department of Homeland Security refused, saying it did not have the authority.
Wang Dukran summarized that the New York Times report said that the White House meeting was like a food market, and the crazy conspiracy theorist Powell’s multi-cat cheating claim was met with a unanimous and lengthy refutation by all of President Trump’s advisers, and the chickens came home to roost, but in the same article the New York Times shot itself in the face because the article said that Giuliani wanted to have DHS seize the multi-cat voting machines. Why would Giuliani want to seize multi-cat voting machines, and isn’t that because he believes multi-cat voting machines cheat?
Wang Duran noticed that at the end of this article there is the introduction of the author, the first author Maggie Haberman, is a special reporter for the White House of the New York Times of the Kurokawa Times, that is, a reporter specializing in writing about the Black Trump of the White House, the history of Kurokawa is 6 years, was joined the New York Times in 2015. And this reporter also because of the black Trump, write Trump advisers and the relationship between Russia won the journalism award. I reckon it’s the coverage of General Heflin, said Wang Duran.
She joined The Times in 2015 as a campaign correspondent and was part of a team that won a Pulitzer Prize in2018 for reporting on President Trump’s advisers and their connections to Russia.@ (maggieNYT)
The left-wing camp controls the media, the courts and the U.S. intelligence agencies, but it can’t control the military, or at least not all of it. Trump does not need a large number of troops if he uses the insurgency law. The left can only control the situation through the media, through the threat of riots, and through the intimidation of the lives of key people, but Trump’s power is not comparable to what he had when he was elected 4 years ago.
Trump has not only been undefeated in the siege of deep government over the past four years, but he has made the U.S. economy the best it has ever been, put the Chinese Communist Party in an internal and external bind, cleaned up the Islamic State, laid down peace in the Middle East, improved Taiwan‘s international standing, and sanctioned the Chinese Communist Party’s human rights villains with unprecedented brilliance.
Trump now has the strong support of more than half of American public opinion and shoulders the burden of saving the world, which is what Trump himself just tweeted, and Trump will consider when it is most appropriate to strike. We can all judge that Trump cannot rely on any force outside the Constitution, and Trump certainly knows better than we do naturally. So, let’s just do what we can do and be done with it.
Recent Comments