The Toronto-based office building of Dominion Voting Systems Inc.
On Friday (Dec. 18), analysts conducting a forensic audit of voting machines in Dominion, Michigan, said state officials pushed for redactions to parts of the report that showed election results were changed.
“Russell Ramsland, co-founder of the Allied Special Operations Group and an election security expert, said in Newsmax’s “The original report had log evidence that we released that showed exactly what we did and what we found,” said Russell Ramsland, co-founder of Allied Special Operations Group and an election security expert, on Newsmax’s “Greg Kelly Reports. Those were eventually redacted, so now they’re saying, ‘There’s no real evidence. Dominion says, ‘These things couldn’t have happened.'”
“But at this point, Dominion is no longer arguing with us; Dominion is arguing with their own user manuals and logs. Because those logs – if they could be made public – would show very clearly that the ranked-choice voting (RCV) algorithm was turned on; it would also show very clearly that there was a lot of error messages; and it would also show very clearly (that) the campaign was reversed. ” He added.
Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s (D) office did not return a request for comment from the English-language Epoch Times.
Earlier this month, Ramsland and his Allied Task Force team conducted a forensic audit of Dominion voting machines in Antrim County, Michigan. County officials declared Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden the winner on Election Day night and later claimed, after being challenged, that the results were wrong and that President Trump had actually won more votes.
Last week, attorneys for Democratic Secretary of State Benson asked 13th Circuit Judge Kevin Elsenheimer to order that the logs be redacted from the report before it could be released, arguing that the logs could be source code and their release could lead to security concerns. But Matthew DePerno, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said the logs were simply setup errors discovered by the audit team.
The judge ultimately took the defense attorney’s view, saying he did not want to allow the disclosure of potentially proprietary information. The judge said he may allow the unredacted version of the report to be released in the future.
In the report, Ramsland said his team believes that “the Dominion voting system was deliberately and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence the outcome of the election.”
He wrote, “The system deliberately generated a large number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots were then forwarded for (manual) adjudication. Deliberate errors result in a large number of ballots being adjudicated – with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our research, we conclude that the Dominion voting system should not be used in Michigan. Our further conclusion is that Antrim County’s results should not be certified.”
State Election Director Jonathan Brater countered in a filing with the court that the report draws “a series of unsubstantiated conclusions that attribute motives for fraud and obfuscation to routine election procedures or error correction procedures that are easily explained and imply, without explanation, that Michigan components of election software that were not used at all are somehow responsible for tabulation or reporting errors that do not exist, or are easily explained.”
After the report was made public, Benson said the state and the nation’s Nov. 3 election “was the safest in the nation’s history” and said there was “still no evidence of widespread fraud.”
Plaintiffs’ attorney De Peno tweeted Friday (18) that he was looking forward to Benson’s written testimony.
Ramsland expects more explosive news to emerge soon.
“I think there will be some news coming out in the next few days that will make a dramatic change in the playing field.” He said, “But the real question is: Will people report it? We’ll see.”
Recent Comments