Currently, Trump the legal team questioned 2020 election fraud legal battle is still in progress, and is widely used in the general election gas-centred (inside) one of the focuses of voting machines have been investigating fraud, as the lawyers to provide more research evidence and as a result, the information about gas-centred and its the money behind the clue is increasingly clear.
Doubts abound at Dominion Hearings in Michigan
On Dec. 14, Allied Security Operations Group issued a forensics report saying the Dominion voting machine in Antrim County, State of Michigan, had suddenly lost key records related to Security and ballot decisions.
15, in Michigan parliamentary hearing “domino” gas-centred CEO for the first time in the face of inquiry, although the CEO predictably denies the charges of the outside world, but at the end of the hearing, a commentator said that at least two issues, gas-centred loopholes in the CEO’s testimony, including “in Michigan gas-centred system without using electronic decision process”, and “did not collect money from the communist party of China”.
One last question about the source of funds, has always been the focus of attention, we are also mentioned in the previous show, on December 1, American famous barrister lynwood sent a tweet exposure gas-centred relations with the communist party of China, pointed out just before the 2020 election, UBS’s investment company, UBS Securities (UBS Securities LLC) help gas-centred voting system hundreds of millions of dollars in corporate finance.
Ron Johnson, chairman of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs, speaks at the committee’s election fraud hearing on December 16.
This seemingly simple financing transaction has aroused many doubts, which are key to the ownership of Dominion and whether CCP is the indirect investor of Dominion.
Barristers reveal that two “UBS securities” moved at the same time
Staple StreetCapital acquired Dominion Voting Systems in 2018, and UBS Ag subsidiary UBS Securities LLC of New York helped Staple StreetCapital raise $400 million on October 8 this year.
In this investment, the most noteworthy is the source of financing and timing. Staple StreetCapital raised the $400 million in an unusual way. Buyouts Insider reported in October that although the money could still be “in one go” amid the outbreak, the deal raised $520 million from a target of $400 million. Ubs helped raise most of the money, according to Securities and Exchange Commission records.
An executive at a large New York-based hedge fund, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the speed and structure of the funding from Staple StreetCapital was unusual. “Private equity financing typically takes a year and involves multiple deliveries,” he says. If there is only one delivery and only a single strategic client holds all the money, that may be a case where only one bank is involved.”
As we will refer to two ‘UBS Securities’ in the next section, for the sake of distinction, UBS Securities LLC, which invested directly in Staple StreetCapital, will be referred to here as’ New York’ and the other UBS Securities Co., Ltd will be referred to as’ Beijing UBS ‘.
It is also worth noting that after the $400m fundraising, and since the US election day, there have been some unusual moves by investors at UBS in New York.
Lawyer Lynwood exposed the $400 million deal between Dominion’s parent company and New York’S UBS on December 1, US time, on the same day, the board of Beijing UBS suddenly appeared a rare shake-up, 14 board members quit in one day, and 11 new directors were added at the same time.
Meanwhile, the names of three Chinese DIRECTORS of UBS in New York — Luo Qiang, Ye Xiang and Mu Lina — who were previously available on Bloomberg’s website disappeared. And these 3 Chinese, have close association with Beijing UBS.
Ye Xiang was on the boards of BOTH UBS Ag in New York and UBS AG in Beijing before his name was removed from the boards’ public information of both companies, according to public filings. Mr Ye was chairman of the board of UBS in Beijing for 10 years, having previously worked at the Central bank of the Communist Party and the Hong Kong Financial Regulatory Authority.
Luo Qiang was also a member of the board of DIRECTORS of UBS in New York and Beijing between 2004 and 2012.
Mu Lina served on the board of UBS In New York and as head of wealth management funds and fund operations at UBS in Beijing. Mu Lina served for six years on the board of China TransInfo, a major Chinese maker of surveillance cameras, until September. Beida Offers big data and artificial intelligence services to the Communist Party, whose chairman is a party member.
Is it really just a coincidence that at the same time, information on the boards of the two “UBS” boards publicly changed? And what else, apart from being part of UBS in New York and Beijing, would there be between them?
Ubs in Beijing is not a general financial institution
The board structure of UBS in New York is dominated by Chinese members, which is very different from the general American financial investment companies. This just shows the close relationship between UBS in New York and The Chinese, or maybe the boss of UBS in New York is the Chinese.
In a move that looks more like a remedy to plug a loophole, ubs in Beijing swiftly replaced its board members, while UBS in New York hastily deleted the profiles of three Chinese directors.
The two banks’ parent company, UBS, is the world’s largest wealth manager, one of Obama’s biggest donors and the first fully licensed foreign securities firm in China, and is often praised by communist Party and state media.
In 2014, the BBC reported that UBS and U.S. and European banks played key middlemen in helping Chinese Communist party officials set up asset trusts and companies in offshore financial centers such as the British Virgin island so they could invest and store assets.
And what is the background of UBS in Beijing? According to current reports, the board and senior management of UBS in Beijing are all Chinese nationals with deep Communist Party ties. At least three of the directors replaced by UBS in Beijing have special status. In addition to Ms. Mulina, one of the directors, Xu Zhe, is chairman and manager of Capital Information Development Co., and another, Cheng Yisun, was listed in the “thousand Talents Plan” by the Organization department of the Communist Party of China.
See from this, Beijing ubs is not a simple sense of financial institutions, to say the collection of the communist party of China information, financial, business and other forces, which also makes Beijing ubs has the possibility of a larger control gas-centred system, and for the United States, there is no doubt that this also became a huge national security loophole, in particular, before the hole was completely not been concerned.
America’s governors are labelled by the Communist Party
In addition to tracing the money deals to the owners behind the Dominion, the election fraud investigations have exposed more “big beasts” hidden deep in the Washington swamp, and the surprising degree of Communist money infiltration has become pervasive.
Vote in this election, the U.S. state of Georgia, and investigate the situation has been the focus of the U.S. presidential election fraud, because although Qiao Zhou governor is a republican, but ignoring the election fraud in the chaos, the governor is more openly refused to perform validation votes signature of the legal procedures, to force the certification was accused of fraud in the election results. Given Mr Joe’s links with the Communist party, it is not surprising that he did so.
Hal Turner Radio Show, a conservative Website in the US, on November 22 quoted a top national security intelligence official with the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force as saying the FBI had evidence that the governor and secretary of state had taken bribes.
On December 15, leading US barrister Lin Wood tweeted that Joe Governor Brian Kemp and Secretary of State Brad Rathensperger were “in cajole with the Chinese authorities”, saying that President Trump had given the two men every chance to do well, but they refused and were going to jail. Remarkably, President Trump later retweeted Lynwood’s tweet.
That seems to send a strong signal that The president may not be willing to tolerate election fraud again, and may be ready to unleash a firestorm and use the president’s constitutional prerogatives to arrest criminals.
And qiao is not the only state infiltrated by the Chinese Communist Party, the Chinese Communist Party has already carried out a comprehensive analysis and penetration of the American state governors. As Lynwood’s lawyer tweeted on December 8: “From California to Joe, CCP has infiltrated USA.”
In February 2020, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo reminded state governors to be more alert to the COMMUNIST Party of China when he attended the National Governors Association.
In his speech, Pompeo also referred to a 2019 Beijing think tank that detailed the attitudes of 50 U.S. governors toward the Communist Party, naming and labeling each one as “friendly,” “tough,” or “ambiguous.”
In addition to the written intelligence analysis, the Party has specific actions, such as the China-U.S. Governors Forum, an event in which the Party publicly expresses its’ goodwill ‘to U.S. Governors.
In 2011, the Obama administration signed a memorandum of understanding with the Chinese Communist Party authorities to open the first China-Us Governors’ Forum. From 2011 to 2019, there were five, each attended by several U.S. governors and dozens of business people. Two of the forums were held in Tianjin and Chengdu on the Chinese mainland, and many US governors and business people were invited to China. Six of the swing states in the election, including Wisconsin and Michigan, have participated in the governors’ Forum.
At the end of October, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that the US would stop participating in the China-Us Governors Forum.
From easy financing by Dominion Company to governors infiltrated by the Communist Party, one can’t help but think of the famous phrase of Recent communist party official Zhai Dongsheng: “There is no such thing as being impossible with dollars. If one pile of dollars is impossible, I will be two piles of dollars. This is the way I work.”
It’s not hard to imagine that under President Trump’s pledge to fight to the end, more communist Party money trading Revelations could emerge.
Recent Comments