At present, the Dominion voting system (Dominion voting System) has a large market in many areas of the United States. Early voting in Las Vegas on Nov. 2.
Research by U.S. analyst Ben Turner has found that the Dominion voting machine is likely to shift Trump votes to Biden by an average of 2 to 3 percent, with swing states expected to be more affected. He called for audits of the Dominion voting machines.
Turner found a trend among counties using the Dominion voting machine — 1.55 per cent less votes for Republican presidential candidates and 1.55 per cent more votes for Democrats overall, averaging 2 to 3 per cent more votes than For Republican candidates. Counties without the use of the Dominion did not.
A former chief actuary of Texas Mutual Workers’ Compensation Insurance, Turner now runs a consulting firm, Fraud Spotters, that specializes in Insurance Fraud detection.
He looked at trends in each county from 2008 to 2020. In 2008, the Dominion Voting machine was used more widely in New York than in any other state. By 2020, the Dominion is in 657 counties in other states and 2,388 counties are not in use.
Mr Turner said 2 to 3 per cent was an average, some states could be higher, others lower, and swing states would have a bigger impact.
For example, in the four swing states (Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Nevada), the Dominion required only 0.24 percent, 0.51 percent, 2.05 percent, and 2.5 percent, respectively, which could easily be turned into a Biden victory based on the “Dominion influence” (2 to 3 percent).
Even with Turner’s method of controlling variables, the Dominion’s influence persists. Turner concluded: “Audit of the Dominion voting machines is recommended.”
In his analysis, the control factors include population, voter turnout, differences between urban and rural populations, population growth, proportion of foreign immigrants, population with low levels of education, areas with high levels of living convenience, population with high levels of innovation, and dependence on manufacturing, race, voter preference and so on. Not only do the associated results from the Dominion voting machines persist, but the probability of fluke results declines.
Calling for the Dominion voting machines to be audited in swing states
Turner asked 10 statisticians to review the analysis. Two of them gave feedback, and none found an error. One of the respondents, he says Turner’s limited data so far suggests its analysis is sound.
Turner’s analysis included election data from the MIT Election Data Science Laboratory and Politico, and Demographic data from the Dominion, VerifiedVoting.Org, and the Department of Agriculture.
Mr Turner said that while the analysis was not enough evidence to win a lawsuit, he called on four swing states to allow The Republican party to audit the Dominion voting machines. “If this is an insurance fraud case, we will definitely investigate the people involved.” He said.
A researcher questioned two American statistics professors, both of whom said Turner’s methods were sound. They asked not to be named.
After Turner published the results, and based on feedback suggestions, the Dominion voting machines were analyzed using 100 control factors, and the Dominion voting machine influence was reduced to 2 percent. But in this case, Turner said, some factors overlap, making the analysis less reliable.
Evidence of Dominion interference in U.S. elections may be backed by foreign governments
Dominion has previously denied that its software counts one candidate’s votes in another’s name or has ties to foreign governments.
But one County election official in Georgia has said it is possible to change ballots through the “adjudicative” function of Dominion software. Another state election official said records of the ruling could reveal who changed the vote.
In Michigan Antrim County Antrim County) the election integrity case together, joint Security working Group (Allied Security Operations Group) under the permission of the judges examined 22 gas-centred voting machine, said in a report on December 14, “gas-centred deliberately voting machines, destination have an internal error, the purpose is to implement systemic fraud and intervention results.”
Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell (Sidney Powell) in late November, Georgia lawsuit, includes a former intelligence sources electronic intelligence analysts’ testimony – 305 gas-centred voting machines used by malicious software agents, visited China (CPC) and Iran, for example, “the purpose is to monitor and control several times, including the 2020 general election, the election”.
According to a recent survey, Dominion Voting Systems has a complex ownership structure and UBS helped Staple Street Capital, Dominion’s parent company, raise more than $400 million ahead of the election, but in an unusual manner and at an unusual pace, no details have been disclosed.
After the election, UBS Securities, a New York subsidiary of UBS, promptly removed the names of three Chinese board members from its website, while UBS in Beijing replaced 11. The website of Staple Street Capital was completely revamped to remove information related to the company and the Dominion. A third of Dominion’s employees have deleted LinkedIn records.
Recent Comments