Jenna Ellis, a lawyer on Trump’s team, said bluntly that the Supreme Court did not want to hear the Texas election integrity case at all, and that the decision was politically motivated.
On December 11th America’s Supreme Court dismissed a case brought by Texas against four swing states. Jenna Ellis, a lawyer on Trump’s team, said bluntly that the Supreme Court did not want to hear the Texas election integrity case at all, and that the decision was politically motivated.
“The Supreme Court has just decided not to hear this case,” Ellis told Newsmax. “It seems to be politically motivated. “But the Supreme Court’s decision comes at a time when the (legitimate) votes of 80 million Americans are being compromised by election corruption and defendant states’ disregard for election laws.”
“It is shocking and morally unacceptable that the Supreme Court should choose not to participate in this situation.” “Ellis said.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court on the evening of December 7, accusing election officials and judges in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia and Michigan of violating the Constitution by altering election laws without a legislative process. The changes to the electoral law loosened the oversight of electoral integrity, leading to major constitutional violations in the electoral process in these states.
On December 11th the Supreme Court dismissed the suit, saying that “Texas’s motion to be allowed to file is inconsistent with Article III of the Constitution, and that the conduct of elections in other states does not have an interest within the jurisdiction of Texas.”
Ellis tweeted on Tuesday that the Supreme Court’s ruling was not justified. “If it’s about affecting a single state, that state doesn’t have the authority to prosecute other states for violations,” she said. But this is a federal election, and electoral fraud and irregularities in those states affected the electoral College, affected the election.”
In an interview with Newsmax, Ellis also said the trump campaign’s legal battle against the swing states is not over. Trump’s lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, has previously made the same point.
“The Supreme Court does not care about the worst election fraud case in THE history of the United States,” Trump tweeted on December 12. “They are only interested in ‘legal credentials’ that make it difficult for the president to present the case on its merits. 75 million votes!”
Alanm. Dershowitz, a harvard law professor emeritus, said the Supreme Court’s decision showed that Trump and his team may not be able to find legal relief in the legal system.
“Three of President Trump’s appointees to the Supreme Court voted not to hear the case,” he told WABC770 AM. “I think that’s telling Donald and his legal team that you can’t rely on the judicial system, you can’t rely on the courts at all levels.”
Recent Comments