On December 11th, at 4pm US Time, the Supreme Court dismissed the Texas case against four swing states for election irregularities. This has provoked disappointment and anger among many Americans, and again weakened the Supreme Court’s own authority.
Still, I don’t think we should give up trying to get the Supreme Court to face reality. On the contrary, it is more important and urgent.
Why is that? In President Trump’s words in response to the Supreme Court ruling, “We’re just beginning to fight.” For example, we see, in the Supreme Court of Texas lawsuit after three hours, Sidney Powell (Sidney Powell) big law submitted to the Supreme Court of Georgia and Michigan emergency case, on the evening of 11 points and submitted about Arizona case of emergency, emergency action of Wisconsin also follow up quickly.
Powell’s case is separate from the Texas case. So the battle on this front at the Supreme Court is not over. Early losses are not all bad. They allow us to assess the situation more accurately, know both ourselves and the enemy, and strive for the final victory.
Previously, I wrote “Take historical responsibility, the Supreme Court!” “The Supreme Court will also find it difficult to confront election fraud in 2020,” the article said. This difficulty arises not so much from the complexity of the case, nor from the outside, but from the court itself, the ‘liberal’ resistance to a return to traditional American values.”
“But the positive can be derogated from, but it has never been absent from the American legal system.” Didn’t we also see dissent from Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas in this Supreme Court decision?
In my opinion, the reaction and strength of the people from all walks of life in the United States to the Supreme Court’s decision will have a significant impact on whether the Next hearing of the Supreme Court will accept the Powell emergency case.
How can we leave the outcome of the 2020 election to the nine justices of the Supreme Court when we know it is America’s destiny? How can only nine justices bear the burden of history? The burden of history must be borne by all Americans and the nine justices.
To put it more accurately, in the words of Lt. General Michael Flynn, who has just been pardoned by President Trump, in an impassioned speech before the Supreme Court in Washington, DC, this morning, “The court will not decide who is the next president of the United States. We the people decide!” In the “We the People decide” process, the Supreme Court’s job is to ensure the legitimacy of the election process and the accuracy and fairness of the election results.
So we, the people, have a right to ask the Supreme Court to do its job, not to bury our heads in the sand.
How to understand the reality of election fraud in 2020, we take history as a mirror and compare it with three historical events.
First, in terms of harmfulness and influence, the election fraud in 2020 far exceeds the “Watergate Incident” in the 1970s. Watergate led to Nixon’s resignation from the presidency in 1974; Forty-six years later, are we allowing someone to come to power through election fraud? !
Second, Bush v. Gore in 2000 was the first time the Supreme Court intervened in an election. The 2000 case simply disputed the outcome of the election, without either side accusing the other of fraud or challenging the legitimacy of the election process. The election fraud in 2020 is of a completely different nature. It is a challenge to the American constitutional order and a battle for constitutional life and death. The Supreme Court’s intervention in the 2000 election is all the more reason to hear the 2020 election case.
Third, Scott v. Sanford, a black slave in 1857, is widely regarded as the worst decision in the history of the Supreme Court. At that time, the Supreme Court ruled 7-2 against Scott, a black slave. The ruling said that even “free blacks” were not “citizens” as defined in the U.S. Constitution, so Scott had no right to bring the case in federal court. The lawsuit was one of the triggers for the civil War three years later. The lessons of history are too painful.
The election fraud incident in 2020 shows that the crisis in the United States today has reached an extreme level, with the collapse of political ethics, political polarization and social disintegration, the collusion between “deep government” and foreign forces, and the comprehensive infiltration of socialist factors into the American society. The United States is in a crisis. No one, including the nine justices of the Supreme Court, should want the United States to descend into another civil war. Accordingly, everyone, including the nine justices, should take their share of responsibility for bringing the tide to a halt.
In particular, the Supreme Court’s decision of 1857 makes justice Taney’s decision on the issue perfectly justifiable from a purely legal standpoint. Although slavery is an evil institution inherited from the history of the South, it was not abolished by law when the country was founded.
Moreover, justice Taney, while defending slavery in the South legally, believed in his heart that slavery was an immoral institution that should be gradually abolished in a progressive way. Not only did Tannin free all his own slaves, but he also gave money to those who were too old and weak to make ends meet when they were freed. As such, Taney’s personal character was and is admirable.
But if viewed politically, Justice Taney’s decision was implausibly absurd, declaring that the spread of slavery into the federal territories and the new states justified it. This judgment not only from the constitution height to maintain slavery and blocked by legal means to solve the problems of the southern slavery way, and established the southern slave states defended slavery was determined in accordance with the law, make the ruling President Abraham Lincoln in 1861 in a “deterrent” passive position, to the outbreak of the civil war by bad effect.
“If this Supreme Court decision becomes law, slavery will not be what the slave-holding States call a peculiar institution, but a federal institution, a common tradition and a reproach to all the states,” they declared.
How similar the situation is today! So said President Donald Trump on Dec. 12, in response to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that struck down the Texas case. “This is a huge, shameful injustice. The American people have been cheated and our country has been disgraced. We don’t even stand a chance of going to court!”
That decision not only destroyed the prestige of the Supreme Court, it also destroyed Justice Taney’s personal image and plunged the United States into a civil war trap.
The lessons of history must be learned.
Nowadays, when tourists from all over the United States and the world visit the Supreme Court, they usually begin with a 10-minute video explaining the court’s history, highlighting the blunder of the 1857 Scott decision and raising their own dirty wash.
That alone is not enough.
Today, history offers the Supreme Court the best chance to erase the shame of history, and the best chance to save American constitutionalism — and that is to face election 2020 fraud.
You know, American constitutionalism draws on the best of the cultures of the world. The Supreme Court, for example, has two statues of Confucius. One of Confucius’ golden sayings, passed down through the ages, is: “To learn is to know; to practice is to be virtuous; to know shame is to be courageous.” May the nine justices reflect!
This unprecedented election fraud has pushed America’s constitutional base and democratic freedoms to the brink. The United States is facing a far-reaching crisis. If the Supreme Court does not do the right thing, the United States is likely to return to division and even civil war. In fact, a large number of Americans are angry about election fraud and ready to fight for justice and the constitution.
President Trump has said it is his highest duty to defend the Constitution and has vowed to challenge election fraud in 2020, promising “never give up” because “if we don’t rule out election fraud in 2020, then we won’t have a country.”
The justices of the Supreme Court should bear the same responsibility in times of national crisis. Never too late to mend. For other relevant appeal cases, I hope the judges show courage and assume their bounden duty!
Recent Comments