On Friday (11 December), Wisconsin republican leadership of a committee of the legislature, held a hearing related to the election, hope to know deeply about 3 November election irregularities in charges, including whether there is any fraudulent third-party intervention, whether interferes with the sense of observation of the vote to supervise, and voters do not need to prove himself as a “limited action indefinitely (bed)” the absence of the voters whether constitute fraud.
Before the hearing, Representative Ron Tusler, the Republican chairman of the campaign and election committee, spoke to the EPOCH Times about the purpose of the hearing.
“We want people to know what happened in the Election on November 3 and have a good sense of whether it was fair and accurate,” Tusler said. “People don’t believe it is true. We will listen to a lot of these people and then we can assess based on what they say whether there is still work to be done.”
In announcing the start of the hearings, Mr Tusler cast aside partisan notions when he called for a review of the evidence presented. “Take off your red or blue hat and be a neutral juror in this case,” he said.
He said his office had received contact information from “more than half a million people in Wisconsin who do not trust the results of this election.” He added, “Our witness today is of the highest moral character and has testified on behalf of taxpayers without any compensation from taxpayers. This will give us an opportunity to properly assess our concerns and concerns about the November 3 election, “he said.
The first witness to speak was Dan O ‘Donnell, a radio talk show host and investigative journalist. He accused The people of Wisconsin of having their right to vote “warped by fraud that runs so rampant that the most sacred right of the most vulnerable among us — the right to vote — is being perpetrated by the people we trust.”
O ‘Donnell described a disability services coordinator who would only identify her as “Susan,” whose job is to care for adults with severe developmental disabilities. These people live in various nursing homes in and around Milwaukee that provide care. He said Susan told him that about two dozen of her clients had told her they were under pressure from third parties to vote for or in their name for Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden.
“The caretakers betrayed their trust,” he said.
He also accuses the Wisconsin Elections Committee, or WEC, of repeatedly violating state election laws in order to “influence the outcome of last month’s election.”
He said the Wisconsin Board of Elections did not stop staff in two counties from issuing guidance that, because of the ongoing outbreak and the governor’s stay-at-home order, every voter, whether or not they themselves were “indefinitely bedridden,” could request an absentee ballot without evidence. That makes it possible for voters to bypass state laws that require proof of identity to apply for and obtain an absentee ballot.
That led to 46,000 voters in Milwaukee and Dane County, O ‘Donnell said, but “there was never a photo ID, which is a direct violation of Wisconsin law.”
He also claimed that, by law, Wisconsin, the election committee must be deleted from the old voter lists 200000 names, but they didn’t do it, and “when Madison (Madison) park illegally votes in 206 cities to collect activity, with Joe biden campaign team, turning a blind eye to the commission.”
O ‘Donnell also claimed that the Wisconsin Board of Elections instructed city employees across the state to illegally fill out mail items, including witnesses’ email addresses, in defiance of state law, rather than return illegal ballot envelopes to voters for correction as required by law.
“All of these decisions violate the written language of state law and were clearly designed to influence the outcome of last month’s election,” o ‘Donnell said.
The Wisconsin Election commission did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the allegations.
Dean Knudson, a member of the Wisconsin Election Commission who spoke at the hearing, acknowledged that despite many safeguards, there has been some electoral fraud in every election. In recent statewide elections, he says, the number of fraudulent votes typically ranges from dozens to hundreds. He noted that this often happens to people who vote twice, or who vote despite having been convicted of a felony.
Knudsen claimed that after the 2016 election, the government took a series of measures to ensure the integrity of the elections, including increasing the number of post-election audits of voting machines. “I have seen no credible evidence of voter fraud on a massive scale in Wisconsin in the November election.”
Recent Comments