Has it ever occurred to Indians: more than 220,000 people have now died in the U.S. New Crown epidemic, and senior U.S. government officials have never observed a solemn moment of silence to pay tribute to those who died, and now they’ve come to India to pay tribute to India’s dead soldiers, which is nothing more than a weasel paying homage to the chickens?
The US-India 2+2 talks ended on Tuesday with the signing of the Basic Exchange and Cooperation Agreement on Geospatial Cooperation, a step forward in military cooperation between the two sides, and talk of a “quasi-ally” relationship between the United States and India began to emerge at the scholarly and media levels. India further echoed the U.S. pull and tilted its strategy toward Washington.
The United States to contain China for the purpose of the Indo-Pacific strategy can be said to have made some progress, but it must be pointed out that this progress is more of a sound, psychological level, it in the United States and India here lack of real common goals and substantive coordination of action predictability. So China can remain at ease, to the United States and India to strengthen military cooperation one is opposed, two is to refuse to be blackmailed by it.
The “threat” that the United States and India feel from China need to be solved individually by each of them, hugging a group to warm up and forming a clique is only self-deceptive bluff. The U.S. problem is that its own competitiveness continues to decline, in the face of China’s rapid development has an expanding sense of crisis. As China’s development is the natural result of the country’s potential release and people’s diligence, rather than forced foreign expansion achieved, the United States wants to rely on geopolitical methods to reverse the unfavorable situation on the development trend is to look at the wrong crux of the problem, but also elected the wrong way to solve the problem. India can not help the United States this favor.
India has long had strategic misgivings about China, and the China-India border conflict has further stirred these misgivings, but the US-India proximity cannot be translated into resources for India to counter China in the border region, which they very much hope will create psychological pressure on China, but from the Garhwan Valley to the Bangong Lake region, India’s hopes are dashed.
The United States and India, two of the world’s current largest epidemic countries almost risk a face-to-face meeting of foreign and defense ministers, if you go back decades, and they are facing an ambitious use of brute force expansion of the country, their “geopolitical diligence” will have a large practical harvest, but they are at the wrong time this time to choose the wrong object, and made the wrong layout.
China has no intention to engage in geopolitical expansion, China and the world engage in mutually beneficial cooperation, the geopolitical way simply can not be stopped. If Washington can do to give up its agricultural exports to China, from McDonald’s to Coca-Cola to General Motors, Apple mobile phones are taken away from the Chinese market, and then persuade its closest ally Australia to take the initiative to cut trade with China by more than half, that is really the determination to “fight with China”, it is really possible to promote the entire “China”. The world has changed its rules of engagement with China.
While China is developing peacefully and cooperating with the world in a friendly manner, there is also competition and friction over interests, but these are not problems at all. Some countries have suspicion and jealousy towards China, or want to play some tricks to get more benefits from China, which China can manage.
The United States adjusts its policy towards China to see if it can take advantage of the other way around, and this strategic impulse can also be traced back to the logic of hegemony. But if Washington is serious about launching a “new cold war” against China, it’s a draught, a self-extreme illusion as the real world, and it’s strange that it doesn’t hit the wall eventually.
India’s self-interested opportunism over-fermented by the border issue, coupled with the kidnapping of extreme nationalism in public opinion, has made New Delhi a bit of a lost cause. What exactly does India want? Which of them are realistic and which are unrealistic? What exactly does unleashing pressure on China with the US bring to India? New Delhi is very much like a little tipsy to follow the feeling.
Pompeo and Esper’s tribute to India’s soldiers who died in the Kalevan Valley has moved many Indians. Has it ever occurred to Indians that: with more than 220,000 people now dead from the new crown epidemic in the U.S., senior U.S. government officials have never paid a solemn moment of silence to those dead, and they are now running to India to pay tribute to India’s dead soldiers, so what is it if it’s not a weasel paying homage to a chicken?
China continues to pursue its own path of peaceful development in a pragmatic manner and to safeguard its own legitimate interests. We do not regard India as an enemy, nor even the United States as an enemy, and we are frank and open. If someone is willing to engage in conspiracy and trickery, we need not be anxious; we will let the bullet fly for a while and see where it ends up and who it hits.
Recent Comments