Just how many vulnerabilities are available for cheating in the U.S. 2020 election? According to security experts, there have been vulnerabilities from the polling site to back-end tabulation, from the USB ports of voting machines and voting software, to cloud-based storage in hosted foreign countries, and more. Once these vulnerabilities were exploited in key swing states, they magnified their devastating impact.
On Nov. 13, Lin Wood, a prominent Trump campaign lawyer, filed a lawsuit alleging that an agreement between the Georgia Secretary of State and Democratic and state election officials in March of this year that changed local procedures and standards for handling absentee ballots was unconstitutional.
The agreement, which allows Georgia county officials to form a three-person board to make decisions about absentee ballot defects (because the voter’s signature on the ballot envelope does not match the signature on file). Instead, the original state legislation authorized these decisions to be made by a single election official.
The Gateway Pundit reports that the Democratic lawyer who struck the secret deal with the Georgia secretary of state is Marc Elias, a former Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer who has been busy managing other secret Democratic election operations around the country. Some media outlets say: His career is all about preparing for the 2020 election. One of the biggest manipulators of this 2020 voter fraud has surfaced.
He’s the same man who paid off the infamous, ultimately trumped-up Russia investigation in 2016 that cost taxpayers tens of millions of dollars and harassed President Trump for three years with the unproductive, falsified Steele Dossier, the same man who led and ran the still-controversial 2008 Minnesota Senate Democratic Party and Elias as chairman of Perkins Coie, which has had sole control of Democratic Party legal work for years, has received at least $41 million in payoffs from Democratic Party-related organizations in the year since 2019, according to Federal Election Commission records, and that’s only the checkable portion, because it doesn’t include payoffs to it from left-wing nonprofits.
The Democrats would never pay him that much money for no reason, and pay him high prices for one reason: to use him to flip elections.
Let’s look back to election night 2008 in Minnesota, when Democrat Franken trailed Republican Coleman by 715 votes, and Elias stepped in to fight the so-called absentee ballot battle that followed. Absentee ballots are also mail-in ballots, which are ballots that voters register to drop off in advance. After Elias stepped in, he held daily press conferences with the media to update them on the status of the battle. Then, as in this year’s election, Coleman’s lead began to shrink a little, to just 215 votes after the first check, and then after months of tug-of-war, he finally lost by 315 votes.
This is not the first time Elias has done something like this, but it is certainly the most impressive he has ever been to the Democratic Party. Why this 12-year-old counting ballots to delay for months is because absentee ballots require voters to apply for prior registration and it takes time to make a fake, which is why this year the Democrats are using the epidemic to vigorously promote mail-in ballots, which do not require voters to apply for registration to directly mail blank ballots to everyone, so the operation will save the Democrats a lot of time and energy, otherwise the number of votes reversed is limited and cannot be dealt with A strong competitor like Trump cannot form a scale advantage.
Of course he is not a constant winner, and reversing votes in this way is only relatively easy to succeed when there is a very small difference in votes between electors. the 2018 battle for the Florida Senate seat was a wasted effort on his part, as the Republicans ended up with a 10,000-vote lead, and
He’s smart in that he only sues in courts that favor him: if he reckons that court is relatively (Democrat) friendly, or when the district judge might be inclined to agree with him, because that ensures seeing the suit succeed.
He has also launched several lawsuits in the 2020 election. In North Carolina and Pennsylvania, he initiated lawsuits that allowed courts to allow election officials to continue receiving absentee ballots days after Election Day, which is not recognized by state election laws. The Trump team is currently preparing to appeal his unconstitutionality case to the Supreme Court.
He used the same tactic in Georgia, Iowa, Michigan and Wisconsin. But those four states were also blocked by Republicans in local high courts and federal courts. His case failed and he walked away quickly.
The hard facts in multiple states show that there are loopholes in mail-in ballots and loopholes in the verification of the identity of voters who vote on the spot, loopholes that facilitate the creation of ballot fraud by interest groups; loopholes that give staff discretion in the opening and counting process to manipulate election results by, for example, removing ballots.
The most effective form of voter fraud in the 2020 election is not mail-in ballots, but rather voting software fraud, the most important of which is Dominion, a voting system used in 200 jurisdictions in 30 states across the United States.
Dominion uses state maps throughout the United States
Sidney Powell, a former federal prosecutor and lawyer for Trump’s legal team, said the software’s user manual even states directly how to “clear the ballot. Votes for Trump can be dragged into another folder and the entire folder deleted.
The Dominion Voting System user’s manual lists a “deleting of results” function.
Also in Maricopa County, Arizona, a 2017 official document states, “Our ballot tabulation technology is used by Dominion Voting Systems to provide results reporting: Dominion employees are currently responsible for the manual data configuration of tabulator results output – non-election employees.”
So in theory, the local IT people who service the machines are the ultimate political gatekeepers and “have the absolute power to decide elections.” Likewise, once a hacker has stolen access, he or she can delete voting data and also move horizontally or vertically to the server hosting all the election data and take control of that server. And given the inextricable ties between the Democratic Party and Dominion, the impartiality of electing these large numbers of votes becomes highly questionable.
Despite Dominion’s denials of vote tampering, Eric Coomer, vice president of Dominion and inventor of the system, was found to be involved in the election fraud.
According to the U.S. media, Coomer, who invented the voting system as early as 2016, told Illinois election officials that as long as they had access, they could bypass the system software and directly access the database of the vote counting system. In other words, manufacturers and government officials, as long as they have access, can enter the system and modify the voting results.
And an entrepreneur, Joe Oltmann, also found from Cuomo’s social media sites that Cuomo himself is a supporter of the extremist group Antifa and hates Trump, and has posted on Facebook that “Death to the police” and “Death to the president “. But Cuomo has deleted all of his social media.
Oatman also attended a web conference held by Antifa in September this year, where he found that Cuomo had publicly revealed that he had arranged the election results so that Trump would not be elected.
Entrepreneur Ortman said: “He (Cuomo) kept talking and talking, and then someone interjected and said, if Trump wins, what do we do? Then he replied, don’t worry about the election, Trump won’t win, I’ve got some moves to make sure that happens!”
Interestingly, just after Ortman posted a message accusing Cuomo of allegedly interfering in the election, his Twitter account was surprisingly shut down by Twitter. What is Twitter afraid of? Before Russiagate, so much fake information on Twitter about Trump, they didn’t censor, delete or shut one down, and now with the 2020 election, the witness testimonies in the voter fraud case keep coming in, and all we see is that it is constantly censoring, deleting important information and shutting down accounts. Before the election, they censored and deleted the dissemination of information about corroborating evidence of witnesses to the Biden corruption case, and after the election, they censored and deleted the vote fraud testimony. Their purpose and direction became clear with the content of these reviews.
The most important difference between Democrats and Republicans in this count is that Biden said, “Every vote in the general election should be counted,” while Trump said, “Every legal vote should be counted,” just as Trump has been saying that immigrants are welcome but illegal immigrants are rejected, while The Democrats promote welcoming immigrants (whether legal or illegal). The Democrats seem to have a very good tolerance and acceptance of things like illegality, so it’s easy to see why all the current allegations of vote fraud/fraud are focused on the Democrats, have you ever heard anyone accuse Trump of having a fraudulent vote?
They say “every vote counts” and you think that’s democracy, but you’re unknowingly ignoring the change in the meaning of the word suffrage. 2 years ago the governor of New York restored the voting rights of 24,000 parolees, even those who killed police officers. Former New York Mayor Bloomberg helped Biden take the battleground state of Florida before the election this November by raising tens of millions of dollars not invested in local felons to help them “pay off” their debts, with the goal of giving them back their right to vote. This year the left in California also proposed an amendment to the California Constitution to allow felons on parole in California to vote.
California and New York allow insistence on ID at the polls, and it is illegal for ballot workers to check your ID! And the Constitution says that only citizens have the right to vote. How can you guarantee whether you are a citizen or an (illegal) immigrant without checking your ID? Such a bizarre and unconstitutional rule could only be thought up, pushed through and supported by a party that wants fraud and cheating to pass it. In a country where you have to check your ID to see how old you are when you go to a bar to drink, how absurd is the logic of not allowing ID checks when you go to vote for the president of the country.
In fact, in the early years of the United States, during the colonial period, most voters were required to have a certain amount of land, housing or other personal property before you were eligible to vote. Because people back then believed that anyone who was dependent on others necessarily lacked self-will and thus was incapable of participating in public affairs, proletarians and minors could not participate in elections.
The reason why the United States split from Britain and became a separate country was also because Americans believed that no taxation without representation, which in turn means that I pay taxes and I have the right to representation. According to them, what qualifications do parasites on welfare who have no taxes to pay have to talk about the right to vote? What kind of officials can they elect in an election? Although the American system now causes many people to live on welfare, the idea of no representation without taxation is still deeply rooted, which is why even now, if a felon does not pay his debts, he is not entitled to vote.
American law has evolved to the point where the voter threshold has been repeatedly lowered. In recent years, leftist parties have also fought to make it possible for illegal immigrants to vote, as well as to lower the voting age to 16. California has a bill on the ballot this year to lower the voting age to 17. Why do they want to do what they do? The reason is simple, not to mention ideological maturity, economically speaking, the younger people are, the less they are able to take care of themselves, which is the same reason they promise more welfare, incite the lower income class to vote and the illegal immigrants to vote: the more people who vote depend on them, the better for them to build a big government that is easy to control; then they further deprive the American people of their Second Amendment rights: the right to bear arms. The right to bear arms.
If you can’t be financially independent and be dependent on it, you can’t be mentally independent. In fact, they are also using the monopoly of high-tech companies to censor the American people’s freedom of speech in social media and to take away the First Amendment rights of the American people. If they take away our First Amendment power and we don’t resist, the next thing is the Second Amendment power of the Constitution. If citizens are stripped of both of these powers, America is not America anymore.
So interest groups have joined the game in this year’s election. In addition to Bloomberg, the Democratic presidential candidate who lost this year’s primary, raising $10 million to help Florida felons vote in an attempt to flip Florida, the largest swing state, Zuckerberg, the founder and CEO of Facebook, who has been censoring and suppressing conservative speech, has also been accused of trying to interfere in the U.S. 2020 election.
A U.S. nonprofit civil rights watchdog group called the Thomas More Society has taken Facebook founder and CEO Zuckerberg to court, challenging his donation of large sums of money to the nonprofit for the purpose of influencing the election and possibly violating the law.
The “Centers for Tech and Civic Life,” a nonprofit organization founded in 2015, aims to help Americans stay civically engaged and secure elections, according to information presented on their website.
Prior to the 2020 presidential election, the organization only received about $700,000 in annual donations. But this year, husband and wife Mark Zuckerburg donated at least $350 million to the nonprofit. The money was then allocated to local election offices.
According to Ballotpedia, most of those private donations went to key swing state districts: $3.5 million in Wayne County, Michigan; $6 million in Fulton County, Georgia; $10 million in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and more.
Tim Griffin, special counsel for the Thomas More Society, explained that in addition to selective distribution of donations to key swing states, there are additional conditions on how election offices should use these grant donors. He also revealed that the Thomas More Association has now filed lawsuits in several states challenging the legality of these private grants.
The multiple cases filed by groups across the United States show that the 2020 election is one of the most contentious elections ever held in the United States, and likely one of the most fraudulent. And getting to the bottom of this election is not only an imperative for the American people, but also a windfall for the world: where our democracy is really headed.
Recent Comments