Just before midnight on Monday (December 7), the State of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, challenging their illegal election procedures. A few hours later, on December 8, the U.S. Supreme Court responded swiftly, ordering the four defendant states to respond to the complaint by December 10. Thus far, while the anti-Trump election fraud and rigging forces were celebrating the certainty of an elector, the tide was turning in Trump’s favor, with his team’s attorney, Jordan E. Trump, taking the lead. Jordan Sekulow said “that’s what can decide the outcome” and “that’s how all cases end.
The State of Texas is suing the defendant four states for violating the U.S. Constitution on the grounds that they made changes to voting rules and procedures through courts or administrative action, but the states did not make the changes through their state legislatures as required by the U.S. Constitution.
According to the GatewayPundit news network, late Tuesday (Dec. 8), Texas Republican Party leader Alan D. Wagner, who is also a member of the Texas House of Representatives, filed a lawsuit against the defendants for violating the U.S. Constitution. Allen West announced that seven more states have joined Texas in a lawsuit against illegal election actions.
On Tuesday night, President Trump’s legal team’s attorney, Jordan West, announced that seven more states have joined the lawsuit against illegal election actions. Sekulow confirmed that Michigan, Georgia, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin must respond to the Texas lawsuit by Thursday (Dec. 10).
“It’s great news that the Supreme Court has taken the case,”
In an interview about the ongoing concerns about the progress of the election lawsuit in the U.S. Supreme Court, Sekulow revealed the previously undisclosed goal of the Trump team, and announced that they had achieved it. He said the goal was for the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene in the election fraud case, and it has been achieved.
Sekulow said, “I can now report that the Supreme Court has the parties on its docket, and they are Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.” “When you look at the named states, (you’ll see) that they now have until 3 p.m. ET on Thursday (Dec. 10) to respond to this complaint case, and they have to respond to very specific items.”
Sekulow went on to point out that the Supreme Court’s order actually indicates that it has accepted the complaint, saying, “So not only is the Supreme Court considering the lawsuit filed by Texas, but they are now taking the next step, which is that they want to get a response from the named states.”
“The Supreme Court decided that they wanted more briefing and required the other side to have to respond.” “That’s good news. It’s great news that the Supreme Court agreed (to take the case).”
Sekulow said it’s good news about the case’s situation in the Supreme Court: “Again, I think it’s clear. This is the case that we’ve been talking about arriving at the U.S. Supreme Court.”
“Encapsulate everything to end everything”
Sekulow went on to emphasize that this case, which will change the outcome of the election forever, is the powerful lawsuit against election fraud that the Trump camp has been waiting for.
He said, “This is the case where the outcome (of the lawsuit) is decisive. The 62 electoral college votes (of the states involved) are enough to change the outcome of the election.”
“This is the major (legal) challenge we’ve been waiting for. It had enough electoral votes to change the outcome. It was the decisive result.”
He again toned it down: “I think for the viewers, they need to understand that this is the ‘catch-all, end-all’ case that can finally determine the outcome of this election.”
In this regard, the moderator asked: “The Supreme Court can (rule) that this election is invalid, do you need to find another way to appoint electors?” .
Sekulow answered affirmatively three times in a row: “Yes, absolutely, the Supreme Court is absolutely available.”
Both possible relief orders considered by the Supreme Court resulted in a win for Trump.
Sekulow specifically explained the current situation and the two scenarios in which the lawsuit could be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court, either way, it would be a final victory for President Trump, which would be the “happy ending” of the case. He showed great confidence and gave reasons for this.
One of the two court relief orders sought in the lawsuit is that the legislatures of the states, all of which are Republican-majority, choose electors de novo,” Sekulow said.
“Because the states’ elections violate the due process and equal protection principles of the Electors Clause. Therefore, they (the state legislatures) can seat the new electors.”
Sekulow went on to describe another relief order that would be for the Supreme Court to directly invalidate the electoral votes determined by the four state governments, so there would be no presidential candidate to reach the 270-vote threshold, which would be equivalent to a ruling that the federal House of Representatives elects the president through a one-state, one-vote vote by the states.
If it goes to the House of Representatives,” he said, “the Republicans hold a 27-22 advantage in voting power, so that would be the Republicans deciding the next president.
He said that because of timing reasons, such as the electoral college, the way the House votes “will be the primary kind of decision.
Sekulow noted that the reason the Supreme Court could make such a ruling is that “it’s different from the vast majority of Supreme Court cases because it’s a situation of original jurisdiction.” “In the Constitution, the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in state-to-state litigation.”
When asked why he was optimistic that the U.S. Supreme Court would rule in his favor, Sekulow replied, “The (Supreme) Court has ruled that it wants to be briefed more, and that’s good news (sign).”
Trump is always on the winning path in the most complex and precise of battles.
The most likely decision of the Supreme Court, as described by Sekulow, will bring the 2020 U.S. presidential election into a rare “snap election” process that occurred 200 years ago, in which the new House of Representatives elects a president by a vote of one state delegation to 50 state delegations. (Read more: 2020 U.S. presidential election possible results 200 years ago, Trump will win)
Due to the huge victory of the Republicans in the US House of Representatives this election, with 10-12 seats in the red and 0 seats remaining in the blue, they have increased the number of dominant state delegations from 26 to 27, which in turn ensures the inevitability of a Trump victory in the “snap election”. As a result, the U.S. presidential election and the seemingly unrelated U.S. House of Representatives election are closely intertwined in an unexpected way.
If President Trump is helped by God in the interlocking, complicated and thrilling struggle, he always walks on the road to victory which is as dangerous as it is bright and clear.
Recent Comments