The police said they would intervene to investigate the suspicion of obstructing public morals, triggering heated debates among netizens and divergent views among the legal community.
It is understood that the public photographed the hotel live spring palace time is Sunday (6th) nearly 9:00, although the action posture is indecent, but because the building height of at least 8 floors, a considerable distance from the ground, the public will be close to the phone also only photographed the shadow shaking; Wanhua police said at the first time will be investigated in accordance with nuisance weathering, but today changed its story that the public has not yet received reports.
Lawyer Huang Lufang believes that the eighth floor height, if the couple believes that the public will not find what they are doing on the ground, so do not pull the curtains, subjective intention to not openly indecent, there should be no nuisance weather problems. In addition, according to the images taken by the public, there were only two silhouettes inside the window, and there was no obvious nudity of the sex organs or key parts of the body, so it may not be a nuisance either.
In response to the appearance of a live pornographic scene at the Castle Peak Palace procession, attorney Yeh Joo-hong said that the couple may have committed the crime of public indecency by obstructing public decency. In this case, although the couple had sex in a room, the time and place were sensitive, and with the floor-to-ceiling windows and the interior lights on, the motive was indeed negotiable, or at least the intent to nuisance indecency was uncertain.
It is not a matter of course that there is a constant stream of visitors, but it is predictable that they will be seen by others if they choose to “have sex” at this time of year in a hotel room with all the lights and curtains open. If the couple knew this would happen and still did not “do it” against their will, there would be a criminal intent of uncertainty.
In addition, if the filmmaker posts the video or photo on the Internet, he or she may also be guilty of distributing indecent articles against public decency, and may face up to two years in prison, criminal detention, or a fine of up to 90,000 yen.
Recent Comments