It’s not a compliment, and sometimes it has an eclectic flavor to it, but sometimes it’s about a phenomenon that’s not so good.
People always like to gather together with their own kind, which is quite normal, and people always need some social attributes to gain a sense of identity. Therefore, in our daily life, we always see all kinds of people gathering in all kinds of places, and most of the time, these places have some attributes to distinguish them from each other.
It is also because people like to distinguish themselves from each other and to use that distinction to label themselves with an attribute. As a result, too many social labels are created to differentiate. High income groups, the middle class, the lower class, etc., for example, have been created.
These groups don’t need to be divided too finely by society, they just need a standard that they can use to influence their daily lives. The movie we are going to show you today is a story of differentiation, a story of a group of people who are differentiated, and how they behave.
It’s a part of normal society, and yet it’s also a part that we often ignore. Ignoring does not mean that they don’t exist, it may simply mean that they are not part of the mainstream of everyday life. But what exactly is the mainstream? The answer to this question is for the audience.
It’s just a story based on a broken diary and an extension of that diary from the standpoint of an observer. The story in this story is bad, but the reality of the story is what we’re used to, and no one thinks it’s wrong.
What exactly is the story of this group of people in reality? Everyone who comes into contact with it has their own answer, and this film gives one answer. This film gives an answer to this question. Located in a lower class neighborhood in Rome, it is home to people who aspire to be middle class, but in reality are not. They have a life that is a little easier for them, but there is a distance between them and the middle class they aspire to be.
This distance is out of sight, out of mind, but insurmountable. A stable life went on and on, but when certain emotions kept coming, this stability began to brew a huge undercurrent.
Then summer came, and life here began to change in various ways. Adults feel that their lives are of no concern to children, but children don’t feel that way. When their parents began to complain about life in general
The child is already being influenced unconsciously.
The parents feel that they can’t see the future of their lives, the child doesn’t have much to worry about, and yet everyone has their own view of the place they are in. This view is different, but everyone’s view ultimately boils down to one thing, this place needs to be destroyed, and everyone needs to be destroyed.
No one knows why a child would think this way, yet every child does. This raises the question that behind all the kids doing the same thing in elementary school, there is something wrong with education.
The children are at an age where they admire their teachers, but the teachers don’t give them a better guide, and eventually the parents find out what the children are doing, and the children appear to be calmer, but there is an even greater shock behind the scenes.
Eventually, all the children, guided by a teacher who has lost faith in life, begin to behave in a much broader way that is even more damaging to the parents.
The only surviving child in the film, however, is forced to continue to be displaced by his father and loses the joy of being a child early on. The story ends abruptly at this point, however, when it turns out that all of this is the result of a child’s defective diary and a social news story.
Only in this story, the diary is added to the mind of an adult, who eventually spins a story, a bad story.
It is not a compelling story, and yet because it is so uncompelling, the story itself is very relevant. In the same way that we in reality are not interested in people below us, we only aspire to the middle class above us, as the people in this film do, and yet we are hopelessly unlikely to change. Even for the middle class, this is true of their lives.
Each class of people has its own limitations, and the mobility between the classes remains almost constant.
While human social activity and the bourgeoisie have developed over the years, bringing the majority of people an abundant material life, the social attributes of all people have also been solidified a little bit. In this solidified social property, no one has the possibility of mobility, and people eventually move downward, while the path to the top is narrow.
Thus, each agglomeration is essentially a collection of people with similar attributes, and the heterogeneous class of people is reluctant to live in an area that is not their class.
Eventually, a certain emotion or way of life becomes contagious to all of us, and an indelible stigma is formed. The tragedy of reality is that even though we see these stigmas, change is impossible. Good dreams don’t last, but bad emotions are contagious.
……
Hello and goodbye.
Recent Comments