One of the major issues that has puzzled the world since the outbreak of the source of the new coronavirus has been Beijing’s repeated attempts to block WHO experts from traveling to Wuhan to investigate the source of the new coronavirus. After almost a year of blocking, it recently agreed to allow WHO experts to go to Wuhan to investigate, but no specific date was specified, and Chinese scientists were to lead key parts of the investigation and maintain strict control over the investigation. Why is Beijing so guilty?
But at the same time, China, from the official to the official media, is constantly “dumping blame”, if the early dumping of blame is similar to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Zhao Zhijian, alleged that U.S. soldiers brought the virus to Wuhan seems too conspiracy theories and stupid, some patriotic public number wants foreign “copy homework”. “In recent weeks, the Chinese authorities and official media have begun another form of scapegoating, that is, either using Western scientists to say that the source of the new coronavirus was in Italy or Spain, or Chinese scientists themselves to say that there was an outbreak in India before the Wuhan outbreak, or simply saying that the new coronavirus came from China from overseas. Imported cold meat products or packages of cold meat products.
But none of this holds water. The WHO, which has been accused by the U.S. of being biased in favor of China for quite some time, has also found it unlikely, at least so far, that imported cold meat products and their packaging contain neocoronaviruses, and has been unable to find evidence to support the official Chinese claim. The official media’s self-created claim that “the new coronavirus first appeared in Italy” was put on the head of German scientists, and I came out to correct it. The praise for “telling the truth” abounds, making the scientists themselves laugh and cry. The Chinese official media even twisted the words of Michael Ryan, the Executive Director of the WHO Emergency Programme, by saying that he had said that “the new coronavirus had been detected in Wuhan before it was discovered anywhere else in the world. The Chinese official media even twisted the words of Michael Ryan, the Executive Director of the WHO Emergency Plan, and insisted that he had said, “Before the discovery of the new coronavirus in Wuhan, this virus had already existed in other parts of the world. As for the paper written by a research team from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, which said that a new coronavirus epidemic appeared in India earlier than in China, the paper was deleted after the media exposed it and at the request of the concerned parties.
Xi Jinping is not willing to take the blame for the neo-crown virus.
There have also been recent studies suggesting that the new coronavirus may have infected Americans and people in other countries earlier than officially acknowledged in China, but scientists still believe the most likely explanation remains that the spread of the virus began in China, and Holmes, a coronavirus expert at the University of Sydney, argues that the idea that the virus originated outside of China seems to be gaining support for political purposes. “This view lacks scientific credibility and only further fuels conspiracy theories.”
For the World Health Organization and scientists, investigating the source of the new coronavirus is crucial to preventing and averting the next new pandemic, but why is Beijing making such a big deal about the source of the new coronavirus? The combined analysis broadly suggests the following.
First, Beijing tried to rewrite the narrative of the neo-crown pandemic through the theory that the neo-crown virus originated in another country. Western countries have been accusing Beijing of concealing the epidemic in the early stages of the outbreak, and the Xi Jinping regime of inaction, which led to the expansion of the outbreak internally and failed to provide timely information to the international community and delayed the fight against the epidemic externally, hence the persistent calls for accountability.
Xi’s intention to rewrite the story of the epidemic became apparent during his meeting with visiting WHO Director-General Tan Desai on January 28, when he said that he personally directed the fight against the epidemic, a claim that was difficult to accept within China at the time. Dissatisfaction. Is Xi Jinping’s statement to Tan Desai an attempt to steal credit or to appease internal discontent? At an early February meeting of the Politburo of the Communist Party of China (CPC), Xi brought forward the date at which he directed the fight against the epidemic to a Politburo meeting on January 7, at which he said that he had already begun deploying the fight against the epidemic.
Now that Xi Jinping has personally directed and deployed the fight against the epidemic, all the narratives surrounding it have to be rewritten. In the eyes of the authorities, this highlights the importance of whether or not China is the country of origin of the virus, and if it is another country rather than China, this can alleviate the accusations against China, because it originated in another country, China can consider itself as only a victim country, or because it originated in another country, so China found the epidemic late and acted a little later, seems to be plausible, and foreign countries are not overly pursued.
But the source of the new coronavirus affects the whole system, and since Beijing wants to take the blame for the source of the virus, it has to rewrite the whole anti-epidemic narrative, and put the epidemic has spread in Hubei province officials are still organizing a banquet for ten thousand people, the people are still in the dark, and finally the authorities were forced to order the closure of the city, resulting in everyone living in deep water, Wuhan as a heroic city, the people of Wuhan is a heroic people, to replace the tragedy of the epidemic by a tragic, heroic people. It’s not just about the people of Wuhan, it’s also about the people of Wuhan. In fact, the so-called heroes here have nothing to do with Wuhan and the people of Wuhan, just as the new secretary of Wuhan, Wang, wants the people of Wuhan to be grateful to General Secretary Xi. In this nationalist atmosphere, Fang Fang, a writer who faithfully documented the days and nights of Wuhan’s sealing, came under siege.
In doing so, Xi either downplayed his government’s early failures in responding to the crisis or argued that the Communist Party’s success in containing the spread of the virus demonstrated the superiority of an authoritarian regime. In the New York Times analysis, the propaganda campaign that began with the dumping of the frying pan gave Xi Jinping a new opportunity to stir up nationalist sentiment in his countrymen and distract them from worsening problems, such as the persistent gap between rich and poor. More recently, with the resurgence of homegrown epidemics, Beijing seems to be trying to guard against a reconsideration of its approach by promoting the theory that the new coronavirus is appearing abroad.
In short, the Xi Jinping administration’s shirking of responsibility has always been heavily tied to early failures in the fight against the epidemic, which the authorities fear has become a grip on others. The New York Times quoted University of Southern California scholar Ya-Fen Zhao as saying, “If Xi can shrug off the neo-crown virus, it could reduce a major source of discontent with his administration.
Recent Comments