On the evening of December 6, several U.S. media outlets reported that U.S. Attorney General William Barr is considering resigning by mid-January of next year. This news comes as no surprise, as it had been predicted that Barr might be fired by President Trump. Because the Department of Justice has so far done nothing in the face of blatant and massive election fraud, the Secretary is clearly derelict in his duties.
Since taking over as Attorney General last November, Barr has been soft on the administration’s attempts to block Trump’s inauguration and subsequent coup attempts, and the DOJ has not prosecuted anyone important. The real test, however, will come in the November election.
On November 9, nearly a week after voting day, Barr sent a public memo to federal prosecutors that instructed local prosecutors to pursue substantive (substantial) allegations of voting and counting irregularities “without regard to far-fetched allegations” before the jurisdictions’ elections were certified.
This is Barr’s first public response to fraud, and it is already several beats too late. Moreover, given that the Biden gang and most of the media, including some prominent news agencies outside the United States, have collectively claimed that the allegations on Trump’s side are “false” and “unfounded” based on a preponderance of evidence, Barr’s claim that What does “far-fetched accusations” refer to? Is his definition consistent with that of the left?
On December 3, President Trump told reporters that Attorney General Barr’s investigation into allegations of election fraud “doesn’t look like much of an effort,” and that the Department of Justice was not involved in investigating or prosecuting anyone. “Disappointing”.
Why didn’t Barr act? Is he anti-Trump in his bones, or is he worried about being suppressed by the left in the future? His anomalous performance reflects a deeper problem that this election fraud has exposed – how many politicians were involved and indulged in the largest election fraud in history? How many American dignitaries and officials have dared to stand up for principle, justice and the national interest?
On November 12, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued a statement that the election was “the most secure election in U.S. history” and that there was “no evidence that any voting system could have deleted or lost ballots, altered ballots, or been compromised in any way. “. This statement is jaw-droppingly inconsistent with the facts of election fraud that have come to light in a number of places.
On the evening of November 17, President Trump tweeted that Chris Krebs, director of the Internet Security Agency, had been relieved of his duties. Krebs had anticipated this outcome because he knew exactly what he was doing. After the election, he set up a “rumor control” website to “dispel rumors” about news and reports exposing election security problems, and he has been busy on his Twitter account with ” Dispelling Rumors”. What was Krebs’ purpose in using his official position and obfuscation?
In key states where election fraud is rampant, multiple governors, secretaries of state, attorneys general and election officials have ignored overwhelming evidence to force certification of alleged election results, and on November 30, Arizona’s governor and others held a certification ceremony while the state’s Senate hearing on election fraud was still underway, so why the rush?
Attorney Giuliani appealed to the Arizona legislators at the hearing: “If you can save the right to vote in America, it’s worth losing your political career.” His words brought out the essence of the issue: which is more important, upholding the Constitution or protecting private interests?
On December 3, at a hearing before the Georgia Senate, Trump’s legal team presented video evidence showing four tally center personnel chasing away Republican scrutineers, hauling out several suitcases full of ballots and secretly counting and tabulating the ballots unsupervised. In an interview that night, Governor Camp said that the video evidence was disturbing. However, Kemp still refused to call a special session on the election fraud issue. His attitude is not difficult to understand when one considers that attorneys Powell and Linwood are accusing Kemp and the Secretary of State of receiving kickbacks from the state’s lucrative contract to purchase the Dominion voting system.
On December 5, at a Georgia electioneering rally, President Trump called on Governor Joe and the Secretary of State to come out and tell the truth. He said, “Hopefully, our legislators and also the Supreme Court of the United States will step up to the plate and save our country.”
The 2020 U.S. election was fraudulently attacked by coup plotters, with the Chinese Communist Party and other forces deeply involved, and the perpetrators committing criminal felonies. If the ballot thieves are pushed into the White House, if the rightful winners are scandalized and slandered, and if those who report and pursue crimes are suppressed and threatened, then the flag of freedom will fall. So it is a matter of truth, conscience, law and order, and the stability and future of America.
On December 5, tens of thousands of people in Georgia chanted “Fight for Trump” in a continuous and shocking voice. It was a cry for justice, hoping to awaken more hearts.
Recent Comments