A cursory look at the left, center and right there is no one who is calling for a cooling-off period for divorce, and all that is said is scolding. So if you are so adamant about it, who exactly are you protecting? The company’s products have been sold in the U.S. and Europe for more than a decade, and the company’s products have been sold in the U.S. for more than a decade. For example, just to make it clear, divorce more national society what is not, not to the top of the street full of opposition are worth adhering to?
More thoughts on.
West Window Random Notes
I’m not convinced that the creation of a divorce cooling-off period will cause a significant drop in the marriage rate, which is the worst part of this policy.
If the divorce cooling-off period really did deter large numbers of people from getting married, then there would be a good side to the policy, not all bad. But no, it’s an outright bad policy.
The people who are deterred from getting married by the cooling-off period must be a very, very small number of people who are already calm and clear-headed about marriage. People who are determined to refuse marriage are often well educated and have the ability to live independently and achieve happiness and stability. In many cases, having such an ability is a privilege.
The vast majority of people in society marry without thinking about divorce, thinking they will grow old together. Again, this is not a matter of intelligence, but of circumstance.
The vast majority have both an unrealistic vision of marriage and a reliance on family life as a last resort. Some of these people will live in happier or average marriages, while others will be trapped in unhappy marriages. But at the time of marriage, everyone thinks they belong in the happy marriage part of the equation.
The marriage cooling off period pits this group of people who thought they would be happy, but ended up falling into the unfortunate ones. Increasing the resistance for ta’s to get out of the marriage is a great deal more difficult for the most vulnerable and unfortunate people to get out of misfortune. This is the most pitiful aspect of the divorce cooling-off period.
And this is something that policymakers know all too well. It is unrealistic to expect that this policy will be eliminated because it is counterproductive and lowers the marriage rate. To oppose the divorce cooling-off period with such expectations is to be disappointed. The real victims of the divorce cooling-off period are the people who can’t refuse marriage.
@Yeh Yu in Suzhou
Several legal questions.
During the cooling-off period, one of the parties demands that the other party pay more money than what was agreed upon in the divorce agreement, or else coerce the other party by withdrawing the application or refusing to cooperate. Does this constitute extortion and blackmail?
If domestic violence occurs during the cooling-off period, should the legal responsibility be aggravated or increased?
What should be considered as the crime of “marital rape” during the cooling-off period?
Recent Comments