In the United States, there is unprecedented confusion about what is left and what is right.
If the Clintons had opposed the Vietnam War when they were in college as a basis, Clinton would not have joined forces with the British leftist Tony Blair to attack Kosovo after taking power; Obama would not have instigated the Arab Spring revolutions in North Africa.
The reason is that any “left” starts out as a true left, full of passion in the opposition; once in power and wealthy, it will certainly not be a true left, but a false left.
The comedian Charlie Chaplin was born in the slums of London and has a deep sympathy for the poor and an abhorrence of the exploitation of the capitalist class. Charley’s role as a tramp is deeply rooted in the hearts of the people. But the Hollywood studio system is itself a part of American imperialism. In order to promote socialist ideas in his comedies, it is necessary to rely on the machinery of U.S. imperialism.
And then, when it comes to the dividends from his films, Stanley is determined to abide by the capitalist contract of individual property rights, not to share them equally among the filmmakers, such as cinematographers and costumes, and he won’t talk to you about socialism. As a billionaire, instead of donating his wealth to the poor in Africa, he spent the rest of his life secluding himself in a lakeside villa in Switzerland, opening a private cinema to watch old movies and look back on a lifetime of scenery. The old poor man, using the standards of the Communist Party, degenerated into a bourgeois.
Therefore, using the criteria of Trotsky and Zhang Chunqiao to criticize Chali as a “moderate leftist,” or a “talented leftist,” or a “creative and constructive leftist for human civilization,” it is also necessary to use the criteria of Trotsky and Zhang Chunqiao. Not without reason. At least Trotsky, Zhang Chunqiao, and Pol Pot are more leftist than the likes of Chili and Obama (though their names cannot be mentioned in the same breath). Both Trotsky and Pol Pot are people who genuinely despise wealth (Chang Chunqiao is unidentifiable), or at least the far left, which is more sincere than the hypocrisy of the so-called moderate left.
Here’s the problem in the West: the “moderate left”, like Clinton, Obama, Biden, and the like, also calls itself the New Left, and the post-millennial monopoly of political and economic power. While Wall Street and IT Silicon Valley consolidate their power, the Ivy League elite are in the high-paying industries, not separate from Wall Street and Silicon Valley. Thus they also represent young talent.
Clinton and Obama form a new alliance with the New Left’s financial imperialism. With the Clintons’ illness and old age, Obama, who is in his fifties, feels that he is the pillar of the new pseudo-left capitalist empire in the United States in the twenty-first century.
But other far-left fringe forces such as Black Lives Matter, Anti-Fascism, and the AOC Gang of Four are also in motion. So before Biden could stand, the remnants of the far left immediately forced the new cabinet to demonstrate “Ideological Diversity” (ID).
Note the term: Ideological Diversity. And does this diversity include patriots and Christians in the South? Of course not. What they mean is that Biden must have Marxists in his cabinet. This is the background of the current situation in the United States, which is on the brink of civil war.
Recent Comments