There seems to be a bit of news about the Chinese Communist virus (Wuhan virus, New Crown virus) recently. Last Friday we just did a program on Brazil’s president blasting the Chinese Communist Party for creating viruses and allegedly waging biological warfare, and then over the weekend the Australian media broke a story about the Chinese Communist Party’s military conducting biological weapons research on the Sars virus several years ago, which also instantly generated a lot of public attention.
Today we will talk about this news and see what the Chinese Communist military actually researched. Then we’ll discuss the news that Hu Xijin threatened to bomb Australia – a news that has the same effect as the “China lighting a fire” picture from the Political and Legal Committee.
[Australian media: Chinese Communist military studying weaponization of SARS]
It was on Saturday, May 8, that an Australian media outlet called The Weekend Australian published a report that said it had obtained a book written by 18 Chinese military scientists and some epidemiologists in 2015, titled “SARS “Unnatural Origins and Genetic Weapons of a New Human-Made Human Virus”. For convenience, we will refer to this book simply as “Nonhuman” in the narrative below.
The book, Not Human, describes the SARS coronavirus as heralding “a new era of genetic weapons,” adding that such viruses can be “artificially manipulated into emerging human disease viruses and then turned into weapons and released in unprecedented ways.”
In fact, the book was obtained by U.S. State Department officials investigating the origins of the 2019 COVID-19, or Chinese Communist pneumonia outbreak, in May last year, the report said. According to the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s (ASPI) Defense University Tracking System, 10 of the authors were confirmed to be scientists and weapons experts associated with the Xi’an Air Force Military Medical University, which is classified as “very high risk” for its level of defense research, including medical and psychological science studies.
In addition, the book also mentions former U.S. Air Force Colonel Michael J. Ainscough’s research on conflict patterns and biological weapons, so the authors of “Not Human” deduce that World War III “will be biological warfare” and that the central weapon of victory will be Biological weapons.
The book has 18 authors, only three of whom are public health or epidemiology experts from local universities, while the remaining 15 are military scholars.
The one who has attracted attention is Xu Dezhong, because he is an expert in SARS virus and was involved in the national and military SARS prevention and control work in 2003, and he is the one who is responsible for reporting to the officials of the Military Commission and the State Ministry of Health, reporting to the General Office of the CPC Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council 24 times during the period, and writing 3 reports and participating in CCTV focus interview for 2 periods and news special for 6 programs. It is clear that this Xu Dezhong is an important person.
Then why did this Xu Dezhong preside over the preparation of such a book that considers the SARS virus to be of unnatural origin? This involves an important background, which is a famous SARS conspiracy theory once propagated by the Chinese Communist Party.
Some of you may still remember the SARS outbreak in China in 2003. In October of that year, after the SARS epidemic had subsided, Tong Zeng, a former associate researcher at the China Aging Research Center, was the first to put forward the hypothesis that “SARS is a genetic weapon of the United States against the Chinese” in his book “The Last Line of Defense”, based on the theory that the infection rate of Chinese people was as high as 92%, while the infection rate of other countries and nationalities was very low. The theory was based on the fact that the percentage of Chinese people infected was as high as 92%, while the percentage of other countries and nationalities were very low.
This hypothesis was refuted by a large number of experts at the time, and the author, Tong Zeng, later admitted that he was a layman in medicine and biology and had not consulted genetic and genetics experts before making this statement. However, some members of the Chinese Communist Party’s military have been using this claim as a basis for saying “the U.S. empire will never die”, including former netizen Air Force Colonel Dai Xu, who became famous on the Internet as “Dai 9”, and a few professionals like Xu Dezhong. The newest and most popular is a new one.
This absurd hypothesis was severely refuted by the scientific community at the time because Hong Kong experts Guan Yi extracted a virus with 99.8% homology to the SARS virus from the civet, which is why it was said that SARS was a plague that was eaten out. And it is very interesting to note that the complete bankruptcy of this conspiracy theory is also attributed to Shi Zhengli. For it was she who extracted all the viral strains of the SARS virus genome from the chrysanthemum-headed bats in the bat caves of Yunnan in 2017.
Xu Dezhong edited the book “Not Human” published in 2015, he was determined that SARS was a genetic weapon and he was already standing at the top of the field, in the words of his book, was so excited that every muscle was trembling. He certainly could not have imagined that just 2 years later, Shi Zhengli, who came out from inside the bat cave, would quietly appear behind him and then kick him off the peak.
The book has a total of 7 major chapters, using the SARS virus as the most prominent example, and systematically discusses the biotechnological theory of how an emerging infectious disease can be made into a genetic weapon step by step by means of human intervention, the animal experimentation route, and how to make and store large quantities of warfare agents. The book even discusses in detail and systematically what methods should be used to disseminate and administer these genetic weapons once they are used in warfare to achieve the best results, etc.
Particularly striking is the conclusion that World War III “will be a biological war” and that “the central weapon of victory in World War III will be biological weapons.
Of course, the central theme of the book is to argue that the SARS virus is highly suspicious and may be a genetic weapon developed by hostile forces against the Chinese, and then to argue how one’s own side should prevent and counteract it.
In other words, while the book “Inhuman” is ostensibly about how to defend against biological warfare, in reality offense and defense are never two sides of the same coin, as Australian cybersecurity expert Porter puts it: “In terms of scientific capability, it is difficult to distinguish whether [the research] is being used offensively or defensively because it is not up to these scientists to decide. ” “Ostensibly, (these studies) develop the ability to make the military immune to biological attacks, while also giving the military the ability to use these weapons offensively. The two cannot be separated.”
[No fight? Party media response revealed]
After the publication of the Australian media report, the Chinese Communist Party officials have so far remained silent, except for an article published by the Global Times, a tabloid of the Party media, which responded with three main claims: 1. the book is not an internal classified document of the military, but a publicly released book; 2. the article deliberately quoted an anonymous analyst to argue that the Air Force Military Medical University is not a research and development unit in the relevant field; 3. the book is The book is a “highly theoretical” academic work, and its content is only an academic opinion.
This response is obviously problematic, and it is problematic on three points.
First of all, whether the contents are published publicly and whether they confirm the development of biological weapons by the CCP are two different things. On the other hand, if you are talking about the development of biological weapons in public publications, it is even more scary to see how far the internal documents that are not publicly available have been studied.
Secondly, the article in “Around the Clock” says that the Air Force Medical University is not a research and development unit in the relevant field, meaning that the claim of the Air Force Medical University is not reliable, and it is not even a relevant research and development unit. Is that the same as admitting that the CCP does have “R&D units in related fields”? Just not this military medical university. This logic, in my opinion, is completely self-contradictory.
As for the third point, it seems reasonable on the surface, meaning that it is only an academic opinion publicly published by the Chinese military, and it is very theoretical, so it is only a purely theoretical discussion, not the same as the military has actually carried out research.
Is this group of microbiology experts really all disciplined and pure?
[Facts against the CCP’s self-revealing research and development of synthetic viruses
Let’s just briefly compare one fact mentioned in the book itself.
Right on page 94 of the book, “Inhuman”, it tells how to use human intervention to get a virus to infect humans across species. The book specifically mentions two papers published in 2012 in the top international journals Science and Nature, by a team led by Japanese-American scholar Yoshihiro Kawaoka and a scientific team led by Ron Fouchier, a specialist at Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands.
Both papers focus on the theme of genetically engineering the H5N1 avian influenza virus, which is not capable of human-to-human transmission, and mixing it with the H1N1 virus that caused the global influenza pandemic in 2009 to mutate its genes, resulting in a new virus that is airborne among ferrets. Knowing that ferrets are a very close animal model to humans, scientists determined that this hybrid virus could also be transmitted between humans.
How does this artificial intervention work? It was done through “animal transmission” experiments. The “animal transmission” experiment, which I discussed in the April 27 show, was first created by the Dutch expert Fauquier mentioned earlier.
To put it simply, he infected a ferret with the bird flu virus, and when it became sick, he took a sample of the virus from its body and found that the virus had mutated slightly. He then used this sample to infect a second ferret, and then extracted the virus that continued to mutate to infect a third, and so on.
When the virus was passed to the 10th ferret, he found that ferrets in nearby cages were infected, indicating that the virus was ready for airborne transmission among ferrets and demonstrating the potential for the laboratory to artificially create a virus with pandemic risk.
The virus that Fauquier was using at the time was the H5N1 avian influenza virus.
The book Nonhuman details the technical route of the “animal transmission” experiment and suggests that it might be more effective if it were supplemented by artificial genetic modification for animal transmission.
Both papers were published in June 2012, and just one year later, in May 2013, Chen Hualan’s team, experts at the Harbin Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, and researchers at the School of Animal Medicine, Gansu Agricultural University, jointly published a study in the journal Science announcing that they had created up to 127 new viruses by mixing H5N1 avian influenza viruses with H1N1 influenza viruses, using genetic recombination. up to 127 new viruses.
Of this large group of new viruses, at least five of the super viruses demonstrated airborne transmission in tests in guinea pigs.
Why use H5N1 and H1N1 for the mix? The reason is simple: H5N1 avian influenza viruses are highly lethal but very difficult to transmit from person to person, while H1N1 influenza viruses are very weakly lethal but very easy to transmit from person to person.
So, although Chen Hualan argued that he was doing this to research a vaccine, more people suspected that his aim was to create a super new virus that was both powerfully virulent and powerfully transmissible, combining the best of both worlds.
The paper exploded in academic opinion at the time, with many international experts criticizing the CCP’s research as “driven by ambition without common sense” and “extremely irresponsible”. The media have also reported it with similar headlines, such as “China Creates Influenza Virus Killer”.
Therefore, this conclusive fact shows that the Chinese Communist Party has not only been conducting “purely theoretical research” on the use of human intervention to obtain super viruses, as described by the Global Times, but has also been conducting mature and massive experiments two years before Xu Dezhong wrote this book.
From this perspective, it is clear why this book, edited by Xu Dezhong, was published in public: to justify the CCP’s development of biological weapons under the guise that “foreign powers” might have developed biological weapons against the Chinese.
Of course, strictly speaking, the fact that the CCP weaponized the SARS virus does not mean that the current CCP virus was artificially created by the CCP; nor does the fact that Chen Hualan synthesized the super flu virus mean that Shi Zhengli synthesized the CCP virus. There is no direct logical relationship between these two. But at the very least, we can confirm that the CCP has been working on biological weapons development, and the Wuhan Institute of Virus is one of the relevant units, so it is only natural that it is the number one suspect in this pandemic.
The international community is not now definitely concluding that the CCP virus is synthetic, only that it is calling for a complete, independent and transparent investigation of the Wuhan Institute of Virus. It is one thing to say where the virus came from, and it is another to say whether the virus was maliciously spread after it appeared, i.e., deliberately deployed in undeclared biological warfare, which directly involves the perverse behavior of the Chinese Communist Party in concealing the epidemic.
[Hu Xijin’s rant about bombing Australia who threatened whom?
Okay, there’s still a little bit of time left, so let’s talk briefly about Hu Xijin’s rant about bombing Australia.
We all know that Hu Xijin played a “ricochet” on the issue of the Indian epidemic, and it was such a rare performance that he was attacked by a large number of pinkies and called a wallflower and traitor.
This is very ironic, right, very a bit of the taste of self-destruction, after all, this generation of pinkies, I am afraid that many of them are Hu Xijin years of incitement “pseudo-patriotism” brainwashing out. Perhaps it is because of the attack that Hu Xijin had to adjust his position, tear off his disguise and return to his true nature as a war wolf.
So, just last weekend, Hu Xijin posted on his Weibo account that, as Australia kept hinting that it would assist the U.S. military and participate in the war when war broke out in the Taiwan Strait, it was necessary to make plans to use long-range conventional warhead missiles to strike important targets on the Australian mainland.
The backlash in Australia has been predictable, with many calling on the Australian government to re-examine its diplomatic relations with the Chinese Communist Party, in addition to many believing Hu Xijin is a war nut. Curtin University professor Sheila Kusa, for one, directly suggested that the Morrison government close the CCP embassy.
This is what we are talking about, this is the inevitable result of accelerationism, the reason why Xi Jinping’s war-wolf diplomacy has gone into extreme rigidity and become completely inflexible. Everyone is scrambling to get on the gas, and no one dares to touch the brakes. All elementary school students know what the ultimate result of driving like this is.
In other words, the CCP’s diplomacy has morphed into the most primitive jungle thinking, as long as the missile can hit the place will have to listen to me. If one chart of the Politburo buried Xi Jinping’s last hope of improving China-India relations, I’m afraid this one post by Hu Xijin basically buried the CCP’s hope of improving China-Australia relations.
Moreover, China and Australia have fought a small trade war, the Chinese Communist Party from coal mines to logs to red wine and lobster hit all over, two days ago also pretended to suspend the bilateral strategic economic dialogue, but just not a word about iron ore, and last year Australia still maintained a trade surplus with the Chinese Communist Party, why?
Just today, the main contract of Singapore iron ore index futures rose by another 10.13% during the day and is now quoted at $225.95 per ton.
What is this concept? Because the cost of Australian iron ore is basically around $14 a ton, and the cost of exporting to the mainland CIF is no more than $30 a ton.
But despite the current rise to such high prices, China still bite the bullet and continue to import, for one reason only: China’s dependence on Australia’s iron ore imports up to 67%, do not buy can not find a replacement, do not buy the Chinese Communist Party’s infrastructure will not be able to boost the economy, it will immediately a large number of steel enterprises shut down, millions of steel industry workers face unemployment.
So, in another sense, Australia also has missiles, and more deterrent missiles, once Australia cut off the supply, I am afraid that its destructive power is far more than the Chinese Communist Party’s East Wind. It’s really hard to say who is threatening whom.
Recent Comments