U.S. Trade Representative David Deitch said recently that he expects to speak with Chinese Vice Premier Liu He and other senior trade officials about trade agreements in the “near future. The Chinese Foreign Ministry responded today that both sides should respect each other and negotiate on an equal footing to properly resolve economic and trade issues.
Speaking at a Financial Times online event on May 5, Katherine Tai said she had not yet been in formal contact with Liu He or other senior Chinese officials, but expected to do so “in the near future. To do so, to assess China’s performance in fulfilling the “first phase” of the U.S.-China trade agreement. Liu He was the Chinese negotiator for the first phase of the agreement.
In response to a question at a regular press conference on June 6, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin only reiterated that the nature of U.S.-China economic and trade cooperation is mutually beneficial and win-win, and that there are extensive common interests and huge room for cooperation between the two sides.
He added that some issues arising in the economic and trade relations between the two countries should be properly resolved in the spirit of mutual respect and equal consultation.
In addition, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said recently that the West has no intention of besieging or suppressing China, “What we want to do is defend an order based on international rules, and our countries have put a lot of effort into that over the decades.
The U.S. side’s claim of a rules-based international order is itself ambiguous and obscure, making it difficult to gain widespread acceptance,” Wang Wenbin said today.
The government’s decision to use the “new” technology to promote the development of the new technology is a major step forward. The company’s main business is to promote the development of the company’s products and services.
The government has also said that “if the U.S. side is referring to the rules set by the U.S. alone, it cannot be called international rules, but only hegemonic rules, which will only be opposed by the people of the world. If it refers to the rules set by the U.S. and a few countries, it cannot be called international rules either, but small-circle rules, which violate democratic principles and will not be accepted by most countries in the world.”
Wang Wenbin also said that only an international order based on the UN Charter and international law is in the common interest of the international community. “If the U.S. side can agree, accept and abide by such an order, we welcome it.
Recent Comments