Cancelled Identity Information
On December 25, 2016, the Tianjin boss “Yin Cong”, who was carrying hundreds of millions of debts, had his household registration identity cancelled by the Xicheng police station in Jinghai District, Tianjin, due to a highly suspected duplication of his account named “Yin Jian” in Hainan Province.
The reporter investigated and found that before the cancellation of Yin Cong’s identity, he and a number of affiliated companies in the bank and private existence of more than one billion debts. After the identity of Yin Cong “disappeared”, the debtors could not prove that “Yin Cong is Yin Jian” and had no way to recover their debts, even through the prosecution of rights.
Today, he is still in his original capacity as the legal representative of 17 enterprises, general manager and other positions, even after the heavy household cancellation, he continues to use the identity of “Yin Cong” to issue debit notes.
Carrying a huge debt, but the debtor’s household registration was cancelled
Wu Ping how could not imagine, owed himself tens of millions of yuan of business boss, account “disappeared”.
Wu Ping is a Tianjin businessman, in 2010, when attending an event, and Tianjin Nanxi Industrial Group Co. Since then, two or three years, the two gradually familiar with, began some business cooperation.
Starting in 2015, Yin Cong frequently sought loans from Wu Ping, and out of trust, Wu Ping and his wife Zhang Na successively lent nearly 50 million yuan. Each loan, Yin Cong promised to repay within one year.
But the next reality is that Yin Cong did not pay back the money on time, and after repeatedly calling for repayment to no avail, Wu Ping and his wife took Yin Cong to court several times starting in 2016, according to the different times of borrowing, and demanded 50 million yuan in arrears.
The first time was in July 2016, when the court ruled that Yin Cong and his guarantee company repaid the Wu Ping couple’s $30 million loan, and so far, most of the loan has been repaid through execution, with only a small portion encountering obstacles in execution.
Since then, Mr. and Mrs. Wu Ping sued Yin Cong again in 2017 and 2019, demanding him to repay the remaining borrowings out of the $50 million, twice, with a total of about $23 million in principal and interest, which has not been enforced so far, despite the court’s mediation and judgment requiring Yin Cong to repay.
When another borrower, Luo Ming, found Wu Ping and his wife in the Spring Festival of 2021, they learned that Yin Cong’s account had long been cancelled.
Luo Ming, also a businessman in Tianjin, had borrowed money from Yin Cong. in November 2018, Luo Ming sued Yin Cong for repayment of the loan to the Tianjin Peace District Court and applied for property preservation, requesting the court to freeze Yin Cong’s bank deposits or seize or attach other property of equivalent value, which was supported by the court. In the process of establishing the case, the Tianjin Peace District Court inquired about Yin Cong’s ID number and found that no household registration information existed, and when Luo Ming’s attorney went to the police station to retrieve the materials, he found that Yin Cong’s household registration had been cancelled.
The information note presented by the police station showed that Yin Cong, born in 1954, was highly suspected of having a duplicate household registration with Yin Jian, a Hainan Province domicile born in 1958 and formerly known as Yin Cong, and that the police station applied to remove the cancellation of Yin Cong’s household registration in Tianjin on December 25, 2016, because Yin Cong had been unreachable. The description did not mention how the two household registrations were highly similar to each other specifically.
In November 2019, Luo Ming’s lawyer provided the police station’s note to the court, but the court concluded that Yin Cong’s ID household registration information did not exist and Luo Ming could not confirm that Yin Cong was Yin Jian, so Luo Ming’s lawsuit was dismissed and no case could be filed or assets frozen in Yin Cong’s name.
In the Spring Festival of 2021, because there was no way to recover the debt, Luo Ming found the same debtor Wu Ping to discuss countermeasures.
The police’s information note did not explain how the two accounts were highly similar
After the household registration was cancelled, he was still sentenced with the original identity
When Luo Ming found Wu Ping, the couple’s $23 million loan was still not recovered.
When he learned that Yin Cong’s household registration had been cancelled, Wu Ping recalled that Yin Cong had mistakenly taken an ID card named Yin Jian to himself, and he thought that Yin Cong must be Yin Jian. He instructed his lawyer to bring the materials about the cancellation of Yin Cong’s household registration to the judge of the Tianjin Hexi District Court, hoping to have Yin Jian listed as an executor and to investigate his property clues.
However, the judge replied that the executor of the effective judgment was not Yin Jian and could not investigate Yin Jian; the materials from the public security authorities only indicated that the two were highly suspicious, and if the public security bureau proved that Yin Cong was equivalent to Yin Jian, it could add Yin Jian as an executee and investigate the transactions between Yin Cong and Yin Jian and whether there was any transfer of property to Yin Jian.
Thereafter, Wu Ping’s wife Zhang Na tried to apply to the Tianjin Hebei District Court to have Yin Cong listed as a person out of trust. Zhang Na told Shen once, the judge investigation found that Yin Cong’s household information has indeed been canceled by the Jinghai District Xicheng police station, ID card number no longer exists, the court can not be found on the computer, can not be on the list of defaulters, “equal to no longer have this person”.
Wu Ping puzzled, “two ID cards highly suspicious duplicate account, should not be put really canceled, the police station also did not express in detail how specific highly suspicious.”
Wu Ping recalled that when he sued Yin Cong in 2019, Yin Cong also appeared in court as a Tianjin household registration, “Yin Cong’s household registration has long been cancelled in 2016, and how can it pass identity verification in court?”
What is more puzzling to Wu Ping is that after the cancellation of Yin Cong’s household registration, he also participated in the trial of the criminal proceedings with that identity and was sentenced to two years in prison with Yin Cong’s identity.
The company’s main business is to provide a wide range of services and services to the public.
In 2020, four years after his identity was cancelled, he is still signing IOUs with Yin Cong’s identity information
The debt of 100 million yuan could not be executed, but new IOUs appeared
The reporter found that Yin Cong was still active in Tianjin in his original capacity after his release from prison, and some debtors were not aware of the cancellation of his household registration. A loan note obtained by the reporter shows that in June 2020, Yin Cong was still issuing loan notes to lenders with his cancelled Tianjin household registration, borrowing a total of 16 million yuan.
The sky-eye search shows that Yin Cong is still holding the position of legal representative and general manager in 17 enterprises, including Nancy Group and Tianjin Huaxinda Investment Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as Huaxinda), and has been listed as a defaulted executee.
According to incomplete statistics, Yin Cong-related companies and a number of banks have debts of more than 1 billion, all of which have been terminated due to the lack of property available for execution.
Among them, on September 30, 2016 and December 21, 2016, Huaxinda, of which Yin Cong was the legal representative, borrowed 350 million and 216 million yuan from the Second Central Branch of Bank of Tianjin. The adjudication documents show that in June 2020 and January 2021, after the judgment to repay the principal and interest, the two cases were successively finalized and Huaxinda still had 580 million in principal and interest outstanding.
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, Tianjin Branch and Huaxinda Company and other three companies in the loan contract dispute case, July 7, 2016 to the court for the execution of about 280 million yuan and interest, fees. December 15, 2016, the case ended execution. 2020 September 15, due to no available property, the case again ended execution.
In addition to the loan dispute case between Wu Ping and his wife, there are several other cases in which Yin Cong himself is listed as an executor.
The adjudication documents show that in a case of a loan contract dispute between Tianjin Supply and Marketing Society Fireworks Co., Ltd. and three companies including Yin Cong and his controlled Nanxi Group, the company applied to the court on June 30, 2016 to enforce nearly 110 million yuan and related interest and fees. In the case, Yin Cong was listed as the executor, and the case was terminated on December 7, 2016 as no clues of property available for enforcement were found.
On August 14, 2017, a branch of Tianjin Rural Commercial Bank applied to the court to enforce the principal and interest of 37 million yuan, in which Yin Cong and the three companies he controlled were listed as executors, and the case was terminated because no property available for enforcement was found.
According to the information on the website of the judge, after the cancellation of Yin Cong’s registration, at least 100 million yuan of the execution money is facing the problem that the executor Yin Cong has “no existence”. However, Wu and other debtors, because they cannot prove that the highly suspicious account “Yin Jian” and “Yin Cong” is the same person, they still can not ask the court to check Yin Jian’s property.
Wu Ping felt that Yin Cong was “right in front of him”, but the debt was at an impasse.
Recent Comments