On November 22, Russian President Vladimir Putin made a public statement about the U.S. election, saying in an interview on state television, “We will work with anyone in whom the American people have trust, but this trust can only be given to a candidate whose victory has been endorsed by the opposition or after the (election) results have been confirmed in a reasonable and legal manner. “
Putin’s words are significant in that they identify three key points that will strike a blow to the Biden crowd and may prompt the foreign media and foreign leaders who follow the leftist media’s lead to do some soul-searching.
First, Putin spoke of the “trust” of the American people. This was not a misstatement, but was in response to the protests against election fraud across the United States and the overwhelming testimony of election fraud.
For more than two weeks, the world has seen: large numbers of people in several states saying that the Democrats stole the election, that they did not recognize the results announced by the left media, that they did not recognize Biden’s victory, and that it was not about winning or losing, but about the integrity of the election. In addition, the protesters were unanimous in expressing their admiration, praise, and support for President Trump, a sentiment based on national interest and traditional morality, not personal feelings. Therefore, when it comes to the people’s trust, which side has the upper hand?
On the other hand, does the Democratic Party, which not only denies election fraud, but also obstructs recounts of legal votes and related lawsuits, deserve the people’s trust with the leaders it puts forward?
Second, Putin believes that there are two conditions for gaining the trust of the American people, one of which is that the opposition party admit defeat. However, the current situation in the United States is that President Trump has not conceded defeat, but is trying to regain his victory through legal action. Moreover, many top Republican Party officials do not recognize Biden as “president-elect,” and they stand firmly with President Trump and support him in his fight to the end.
Third, another condition for trust, as Putin points out, is that the election results be reasonably and legally confirmed. The facts are that this election has been proven to have been a massive fraud, with at least millions of ballots tampered with; that there were glaring errors or flaws in the counting of votes in several states; and that the Trump campaign has filed claims for recounts, audits, and that the results of the state should not be certified. The legal proceedings are ongoing, and more evidence is still being collected and compiled. Clearly, the dust has not settled.
In light of the above analysis, Putin’s position is reasonable, legal, and reflects the prudence of a leader who should respect the law and the facts.
Putin is telling the truth. However, these obvious facts have been deliberately ignored and even distorted by the American left media and many foreign media. The left media denied the legitimacy of the Trump camp’s arguments, denied the irrefutable evidence of fraud, and instead called the president’s failure to concede “undermining democracy,” accused the fraud “baseless,” and suggested that he “leave gracefully. “. The left media and leftists have backfired against legal process and fair play.
Since Biden’s self-declaration of election on November 7, amidst a flurry of leftist media, many national leaders have been quick to congratulate him, including many Western democracies and governments strongly supported by the Trump administration. A few heads of state, however, did not follow the crowd, and their views were striking.
Slovenian Prime Minister Janez Jansa was the first to explicitly disavow Biden, tweeting, “Interesting. Election lawsuits filed in the states, court decisions pending, but the US mainstream media (non-government media) pre-empted the announcement of the victory ……”
Mexican President Obrador said at a press conference on November 7 that he would wait until the end of the electoral process before making a decision. He added that “President Trump has always respected us” and that “we want to respect the self-determination and the rights of the (American) people.”
On November 11, Ovrador again said that it was too early to congratulate Biden. He stated through the media that “the Mexican government is not a puppet of any foreign government” and that “we cannot give any form of recognition to any government that was established illegally.
In addition, President Bonasolo of Brazil and Kim Jong-un of North Korea have been silent so far, and their silence has been “loud”.
Putin’s attitude toward the election is all the more striking because of Russia’s military power, its competition and cooperation with the United States, and its delicate relationship with China. He said the Russian side’s failure to congratulate Biden was a “formality” with no ulterior motive, and he did not think it would lead to a deterioration in U.S.-Russian relations because “that has already been destroyed.
In October, Biden told the press that he considered Russia to be the greatest threat to the United States today, a statement he made throughout his campaign and vice presidency. Putin has called it “bitter anti-Russian rhetoric,” and responded that “unfortunately, we’re used to hearing it.
Furthermore, the left wing of the Democratic Party has been falsely accusing him of “collusion with Russia” and Russian interference in the U.S. election for the past four years since Trump took office. After the Hunt “computer-gate” scandal was exposed in October this year, the left media and Biden called it “Russian disinformation,” which was refuted by Tony Bobulinski, a witness and Hunt’s partner.
Will Putin look forward to working with Biden in his heart, given that Russia has been repeatedly blackballed?
Speaking at the unveiling of the “Wall of Sorrow” on October 30, 2017, he said: “Political repression is a tragedy for all our people, for the whole of society, and a heavy blow to our people, including its The roots, culture, and self-awareness of the people. To this day we are still suffering the consequences of that persecution. Our obligation is – not to forget.”
Vladimir Putin knows the ugliness of socialism and communism, and he certainly knows the difference between an American election that was fair and honest, or a coup d’état that was spoiled by leftist fraud. He also knows whether foreign powers such as the Chinese Communist Party are behind the mudslinging. As netizens have commented, Putin’s stance on the U.S. election was indeed remarkable.
It is unfortunate that many in the media and many politicians who claim to champion democracy and human rights have deliberately ignored the facts, disregarded the law, and even abandoned morality on this important issue of the U.S. election. The prudence of a very few leaders, such as Vladimir Putin, is truly sober and astute.
Recent Comments