Yan Limeng’s third report mentioned the scientific community “crocodile”

Just two days before April Fool’s Day, the WHO’s false virus report that made peace with the Chinese Communist Party finally came out. However, only a few hours later, the United States joined a total of 14 countries to issue a joint statement expressing their lack of confidence in the impartial and independent stance of this belated report, and even WHO Director-General Desai Tan, who has repeatedly stood up for the Chinese Communist Party, publicly stated that “the expert team encountered difficulties in obtaining the original data,” which is tantamount to turning the report saved by the Chinese Communist Party and the experts into a pile of scrap paper. This is tantamount to taking the report saved by the Chinese Communist Party and the experts and turning it into a pile of scrap paper.

Just one day later, on March 31, virus researcher Dr. Yan Limeng’s team released her third report, entitled “Errors from two unsolicited peer reviews further confirm the origin of the CCP virus in the Wuhan lab and the credibility of the report.” This nearly 70-page full English-language report gives us hope that the truth about the origin of the virus will be revealed – and that the world has reached a critical point where the truth must be known.

Interestingly, the report also begins with a number of pages revealing some of the shady aspects of the international scientific community, which seems to be a high class international scientific community actually exists in the swamp, these experts with a halo have lost their open and impartial scientific position, also to stand for the Chinese Communist Party, trying to fool the people of the world, the virus traceability of the matter muddy. The report lists a number of people and events, which I will try to summarize here.

Peter Daszak, a zoologist and president of the international non-profit organization Ecological Health Alliance. It was through his NGO that millions of dollars from the U.S. Institute of Health flowed to the Wuhan lab, and it was Daszak who organized the scientific community statement published in the Lancet on February 19, 2020, which was signed by 27 experts in support of The natural origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. As the organizer, Darak had to sign, but this also revealed his unclear position with the Wuhan lab.

Randy Schekman, a cell biologist, Nobel laureate in medicine and professor at the University of California, Berkeley. Schekman acted as a staging ground for $500,000 from an anonymous donor to the EcoHealth Alliance at a critical time when the U.S. Institute of Health halted funding for the organization following the outbreak of the Chinese Communist virus, claiming in an email The money was intended to replace the NIH money, noting the donor’s insistence on anonymity. Whether it’s the NIH or the donors hiding behind the scenes, it’s a question the world would like to know why these institutions are funding viral biological weapons research.

Professor Linfa Wang of the Duke National University of Singapore School of Medicine and Professor Ralph Baric of the University of North Carolina. These two are long-time partners of Zhengli Shi, and it is clear from the release of their emails with Darak that they asked to avoid signing the Lancet statement in order to avoid catching fire. We can ask, if the scientific righteousness, poor reasoning, then what is there to be afraid of the unseemly? According to their email, they want to “maximize their independent voice,” which means they are pretending to speak for the Chinese Communist Party as a third-party independent voice.

Professor Ian Lipkin of Columbia University, USA. He and four others published a paper in Nature on March 17, 2020, titled “The Proximate Origins of SARS-CoV-2,” which cites Shi Zhengli in full, causing more confusion in the scientific community. This man has received many awards from the Chinese Communist Party in the last two decades and has close ties to the Chinese Communist Party.

Professor Robert Gallo of MIT, the lead author of the MIT review of the two so-called “unsolicited peer reviews. In December 2020, three months after the completion of the review report compiled by Gallo, the Chinese Communist Party awarded Gallo the highest award in the field of medicine: the “C.S.S. Concordia Life Prize. Life Award,” thus demonstrating the depth of Gallo’s ties to the CCP.

Gigi Gronvall of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health, Health and Safety Research is the lead author of a separate review report. From the emails that have been disclosed, it appears that Gronvall and Datsyuk and other scientists have developed an “alliance” that the virus must come from nature, regardless of evidence, and never from a laboratory.

The above-mentioned bigwigs in the scientific community, each with a name and a leader, are calling the shots in the field of virology and medicine, and the mainstream leftist media and many senior government figures are influenced by these people, thus seriously interfering with the decision to trace the origin of the virus and distorting the public’s understanding. It can be said that with so many “crocodiles” in the scientific community who are not sure of right and wrong and who stand for the Chinese Communist Party, the origin of the virus will never be clear, and now it is time to distinguish right from wrong.